Notes and references
z Crystal data for L1 (Fig. S11w): Pale yellow crystal. C36 H47 N O7, M
= 605.75, 0.11 ꢁ 0.09 ꢁ 0.06 mm3, Orthorhombic, space group P 21
21 21 with a = 8.2548(11) A, b = 18.988(3) A, c = 20.873(3) A, a =
901, b = 901, g = 901 V = 3271.7(8) A3, Z = 4, rc = 1.230 g cmꢂ3
,
F(000) = 1304, Absorption coefficient = 0.084 mmꢂ1, Mo-Ka radia-
tion, l = 0.71073 A, T = 100 K, 2ymax = 56.61, Number of measured
and independent reflections = 21795/4548, Rint. = 0.0527, R1 =
0.0480, wR2 = 0.1124. Maximum and Minimum residual electron
density is 0.147 and ꢂ0.138 eAꢂ3, respectively. CCDC: 707106;
Crystal data for L1 + Na+: Pale yellow crystal. C36 H47 Cl N Na
3
ꢀ
O11, M = 728.19, 0.09 ꢁ 0.06 ꢁ 0.05 mm , Triclinic, space group P1
with a = 11.4813(19) A, b = 13.416(2) A, c = 13.433(2) A, a =
69.085(3)1, b = 73.360(3)1, g = 66.898(3)1, V = 1751.9(5) A3, Z = 2,
rc = 1.380 g cmꢂ3, F(000) = 772, Absorption coefficient = 0.184
mmꢂ1, Mo-Ka radiation, l = 0.71073 A, T = 100 K, 2ymax = 521,
Number of measured and independent reflections = 9825/6726, Rint.
= 0.0371; R1 = 0.0654 (I 4 2s(I)), Rw = 0.1660 (observed data).
Maximum and Minimum residual electron density is 0.423 and
ꢂ0.431 eAꢂ3, respectively. CCDC: 707107.w
1 (a) C. J. Pedersen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89, 7017;
(b) G. R. Newkome, J. D. Sauer, J. M. Roper and D. C. Hager,
Chem. Rev., 1977, 77, 513; (c) Y. Inoue and G. W. Gokel, Cation
Binding by Macrocycles: Complexation of Cationic Species by
Crown Ether, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1990; (d) J. W. Steed
and J. L. Atwood, Supramolecular Chemsitry, Wiley, Chichester,
UK, 2000.
2 (a) A. P. de Silva and S. A. de Silva, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1986, 1709; (b) A. P. de Silva, G. D. McClean and
S. Pagliari, Chem. Commun., 2003, 2010; (c) A. M. Costero, S. Gil,
J. Sanchis, S. Peransi, V. Sanz and J. A. G. Williams, Tetrahedron,
2004, 60, 6327.
Fig. 4 X-Ray crystal structure of L1 + Na+ complex. Hydrogen
atoms and the perchlorate ion are omitted for clarity.
change in intensity was observed (Fig. 3b insert) suggesting
1 : 1 binding ratio of L1 : Zn2+. The association constant was
found to be 6.7 ꢁ 105 [Mꢂ1]. Similarly, for the Hg2+, the
titration experiment indicated a 1 : 1 complex formation in
acetonitrile (Fig. S4).w
3 (a) A. P. Marchand, K. A. Kumar, A. S. McKim, K. Mlinari0c-
Majerski and G. Kragol, Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 3467;
(b) A. P. Marchand, A. McKim and K. A. Kumar, Tetrahedron,
1998, 54, 13421.
When we performed the binding study with a mixture of
metal ions, the fluorescence intenstiy of the Zn2+ was not
changed in the presence of metal ions like Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+
,
Cd2+, and Pb2+. Interestingly, the Zn2+ induced emission
was quenched upon addition of Na+. This must be due to
stronger binding of Na+ with the crown ether. Thus, the
present system acts like an INHIBIT logic gate13
(Fig. S13–S14)w where Zn2+ and Na+ are the two inputs.
Intrigued by this observation we decided to probe the
coordination mode of the sodium ion with ligand L1. A single
crystal X-ray analysis of sodium-ligand complex (L1 + Na+)
4 F. A. Khan, J. Dash, Ch. Sudheer, N. Sahu and K. Parasuraman,
J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 7565.
5 P. K. Bharadwaj, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 51, 251.
6 F. A. Khan and J. Dash, J. Org. Chem., 2003, 68, 556.
7 M. Nazhaoui, J.-P. Joly, S. Kitane and M. J. Berrada, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1998, 3845.
8 K. Makino, T. Suzuki and Y. Hamada, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.,
2004, 77, 1649.
9 J. B. Birks, Photophysics of aromatic molecules, Wiley-Interscience,
New York, 1970.
10 A. Bissell, E. Calle, A. P. de Silva, S. A. de Silva, H. Q.
N. Gunaratne, J.-L. Habib-Jiwan, S. L. A. Peiris, R. A. A.
D. Rupasinghe, T. K. S. D. Samarasinghe, K. R. A.
S. Sandanayake and J.-P. Soumillion, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2, 1992, 1559.
11 (a) T. Hirano, K. Kikuchi, Y. Urano and T. Nagano, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2002, 124, 6555; (b) K. Hanaoka, K. Kikuchi, H. Kojima,
Y. Urano and T. Nagano, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 2996;
(c) K. Hanaoka, K. Kikuchi, H. Kojima, Y. Urano and
T. Nagano, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 12470;
(d) H.-Y. Gong, Q.-Y. Zheng, X.-H. Zhang, D.-X. Wang and
M.-X. Wang, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 4895, and the references therein.
12 (a) E. M. Nolan and S. J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
14270; (b) X. Guo, X. Qian and L. Jia, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004,
126, 2272; (c) J. V. Mello and N. S. Finney, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 10124; (d) A. Coskun and E. U. Akkaya, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2006, 128, 14474; (e) M. G. Choi, H. J. Kim and S.-K. Chang,
Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2008, 29, 567, and references therein.
13 M. de Sousa, M. Kluciar, S. Abad, M. A. Miranda, B. de Castro
and U. Pischel, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2004, 3, 639.
14 The data was collected on a Bruker SMART APEX diffractometer.
The structure was solved using SIR-92 and refined using
SHELXL-97. CCDC:707106 (L1); CCDC:707107 (L1 + Na+).
14
was performed (Fig. 4).z The X-ray structure demonstrated
that sodium ion is coordinated to the oxygen atoms of the
crown ether (2.43–2.70 A) and is remote from the tertiary
nitrogen (3.24 A) atom (Table S3).wThis is reflected in the
fluorescence emission of L1 in solution state study with Na+
ion as the PET remains operative.
In conclusion, we have reported a novel hybrid of aza
crown-oxabridged fluorogenic chemosensor L1 which shows
high selectivity towards Zn2+ and Hg2+ compared to the
parent monoaza-18-crown-6. Binding nature of Zn2+ and
Na+ towards L1 was explored using solution studies and
a single crystal X-ray analysis of sodium-ligand complex
(L1 + Na+).
We thank the Department of Science and Technology
(DST), New Delhi for financial assistance. We thank Prof.
P. K. Bharadwaj for useful discussions. F.A K. acknowledges
the DST for a Swarnajayanti Fellowship. K.P. and K K S.
thank CSIR, New Delhi for fellowship.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Chem. Commun., 2009, 2399–2401 | 2401