approach to screen class A b-lactamase inhibitors in a more
efficient manner compared to nitrocefin assay.
In summary, we have developed a simple and effective
Au-NPs-based colorimetric method for efficient screening of
class A b-lactamase activity and inhibitors both in vitro and in
bacterial strains without requirement of sophisticated instru-
ments. The colorimetric method based on the aggregation of
Au-NPs can be used not only to sensitively identify the enzyme
activity, but also to provide valuable information on the
efficiencies of simultaneous screening of different enzyme
inhibitors in vitro and in the varied enzyme expressed bacteria.
This simple screening method may offer an alternative
platform to study the inactivation of b-lactam antibiotics for
the approach that counteract antibacterial drug resistance; it
may also open the doors for the future application of nano-
particles-based technologies in the field of drug-development.
The authors gratefully acknowledge SEP (RG139/06), URC
(RG56/06) and start-up grants in Nanyang Technological
University, Singapore for financial support.
Fig. 4 Au-NPs (2.5 nM)-based colorimetric assays for Bla inhibition
in a 96-well microplate with different combinations of four inhibitors
and four class A Bla contained living bacteria (A: transformed TEM-1
E. coli Bl21, B108 cfu mLꢁ1, B: TEM-1 E. coli, B109 cfu mLꢁ1
,
C: Bacillus cereus, B8 ꢂ 109 cfu mLꢁ1, and D: K. pneumoniae, B3 ꢂ
108 cfu mLꢁ1). Bacteria without inhibitor as positive control.
Wild type E. coli Bl21 (no Bla) and Au-NPs solutions as negative
controls (inhibitors concentration: 0.1 mM).
TEM-1, TEM-1, PenPC, and SHV-18, respectively, were
chosen and the enzyme activities were identified in the absence
and presence of Bla inhibitors. Wild type E. coli Bl21, which
could not express Bla, was used as a negative control. As shown
in Fig. 4, the clear colour change in plasmid-transformed E. coli
Bl21 exhibited the trends similar to those observed in in vitro
measurement. CA and TZB are comparable in this bacterial
strain. A red colour in TZB indicated the relatively potent Bla
inhibition, a reddish colour in CA exhibited a weaker inhibition
activity than that in TZB but stronger than that in SUL. A blue
colour in ATM, which was close to the solution without inhibitor
treatment, demonstrated the least activity for the enzyme inhibi-
tion. The absorbance ratios at 650 nm and 520 nm also con-
firmed the same inhibition order (TZB 4 CA 4 SUL 4 ATM)
as observed in colour change (see ESI, Fig. S7).w Similar results
were obtained in TEM-1 E. coli, and Bacillus cereus strains,
although a large amount of bacterial strains had to be used due
to the lower enzyme activities in these two bacteria. We also
tested the enzyme inhibition screening by using K. pneumoniae,
one clinically isolated b-lactam resistant bacterial strain, which
contained the extended-spectrum b-lactamase (ESBL): SHV-18.
A red colour in CA demonstrated the efficient enzyme inhibition,
which was more effective compared to TZB. This is in
accordance with the known activities of these inhibitors in
K. pneumoniae.10 Similarly, the blue in ATM suggested weak
enzyme inactivation. This result demonstrated that different
inhibitors would exhibit various activities toward the same
bacterial enzyme. Furthermore, the different Bla inhibitions
observed in E. coli, Bacillus cereus, and K. pneumoniae strains
were attributed to the various inhibition activities of the same
inhibitor to the different enzymes in bacteria. As control, the
enzyme inhibitor screening was also conducted by using
nitrocefin assay (see ESI, Fig. S6).w No difference in colour
change was observed when the inhibitor concentration was
0.1 mM. The significant colour change with respect to the
enzyme inhibition could only be identified after the addi-
tion of a large amount of inhibitors (43.0 mM). The trends in
colour change were identical to the results as determined
by using Au-NPs. The lower inhibitor concentrations used
in Au-NPs-based colorimetric method indicated a higher
reporting threshold, which could lead to an alternative
Notes and references
1 C. T. Walsh, Antibiotics Actions: Origins and Resistance, ASM
Press, Washington, DC, 1st edn, 2003.
2 S. N. Maiti, O. A. Philips, R. G. Micetich and D. M. Livermore,
Curr. Med. Chem., 1998, 5, 441.
3 R. G. Micetich, S. M. Salama, S. N. Maiti, A. V. N. Reddy and
R. Singh, Curr. Med. Chem. Anti. Infect. Agents., 2002, 1, 193.
4 (a) K. Bush, G. A. Jacoby and A. A. Medeiros, Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother., 1995, 39, 1211; (b) L. G. Puckett, J. C. Lewis,
L. G. Bachas and S. Daunert, Anal. Biochem., 2002, 309, 224;
(c) V. Speldooren, B. Heym, R. Labia and M. H. Nicolas-
Chanoine, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 1998, 42, 879.
5 (a) Z. Yang, G. Liang and B. Xu, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 315;
(b) W. Z. Huang, Z. Beharry, Z. Zhang and T. Palzkill, Protein
Eng., 2003, 16, 853; (c) S. L. McGovern, B. T. Helfand, B. Feng
and B. K. Shoichet, J. Med. Chem., 2003, 46, 4265.
6 D. A. Schultz, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2003, 14, 13.
7 (a) C. Sonnichesn, B. M. Reinhard, J. Liphardt and A. P. Alivisatos,
¨
Nat. Biotechnol., 2005, 23, 741; (b) H. Li and L. Rothberg, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2004, 101, 14036; (c) S. Y. Park, A. K. R. Lytton-
Jean, B. Lee, S. Weigand, G. C. Schatz and C. A. Mirkin, Nature, 2008,
451, 553; (d) J. J. Storhoff, A. D. Lucas, V. Garimella, Y. P. Bao and
U. R. Muller, Nat. Biotechnol., 2004, 22, 883; (e) C. D. Medley,
J. E. Smith, Z. Tang, Y. Wu, S. Bamrungsap and W. Tan, Anal.
Chem., 2008, 80, 1067; (f) Y. L. Wang, D. Li, W. Ren, Z. J. Liu,
S. J. Dong and E. K. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2008, 2520.
8 (a) H. Otsuka, Y. Akiyama, Y. Nagasaki and K. Kataoka, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 8226; (b) J. M. De la Fuente, A. G. Barrientos,
´
T. C. Rojas, J. Rojo, J. Canada, A. Fernandez and S. Penade˙s,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 2257; (c) J. Liu and Y. Lu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 6642; (d) S. O. Obare, R. E. Hollowell and
C. J. Murphy, Langmuir, 2002, 18, 10407; (e) X. Xue, F. Wang and
X. G. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 3244.
9 (a) C. L. Schofield, R. A. Field and D. A. Russell, Anal. Chem.,
2007, 79, 1356; (b) D. J. Xiong, M. L. Chen and H. B. Li, Chem.
Commun., 2008, 880; (c) Z. Wang, R. Levy, D. G. Fernig and
M. Brust, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 2214; (d) C. Guarise,
L. Pasquato, V. De Filippis and P. Scrimin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A., 2006, 103, 3978; (e) A. Laromaine, L. Koh,
M. Murugesan, R. V. Ulijn and M. M. Stevens, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 4156; (f) Y. D. Choi, N. H. Ho and C. H. Tung,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 707; (g) R. R. Liu, R. Liew,
J. Zhou and B. G. Xing, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007,
46, 8799.
10 J. K. Rasheed, G. J. Anderson, H. Yigit, A. M. Queenan,
A. Domenech-Sanchez, J. M. Swenson, J. W. Biddle,
M. J. Ferraro, G. A. Jacoby and F. C. Tenover, Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother., 2000, 44, 2382.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
1974 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 1972–1974