The fluorescence spectra of 1b-d in THF (Figure 4a)
display an intense contribution with well-resolved vibrational
features at 360/368 and 377/385 nm and a relatively small
Stokes shift21 of 15/23 nm. The fact that the fluorescence
spectra are better resolved than the absorption spectra
suggests that, in the excited state, the bonds joining the
fluorene and the phenyl rings acquire some double bond
character, giving rise to a more rigid/planar structure.16
Moreover, the emission maxima of 1b-d are consistent with
those reported in the literature for chromophores containing
the “phenyl-fluorene-phenyl” moieties.14,15 The emission
band for 1b-d is red-shifted with respect to 1a due to the
important contributions of the phenyl rings leading to a more
conjugated excited state. This effect has been previously
observed with indenofluorene derivatives.22 The fluorescence
spectra of DSF-IFs 2 were also studied in solution (Figure
4b). 2a presents two well-resolved emission bands at 346
and 365 nm.6 The very small Stokes shift (6 nm) leads us to
conclude that the DSF-IF 2 core is highly rigid, restricting
structural deformation upon photoexcitation. Interestingly,
DSF-IFs 2b-d exhibit a significantly different behavior than
2a. Indeed, for 2b-d, a large, structureless, and red-shifted
Figure 3.
Absorption spectra of 1a-d and 2a-d (10-5 M in THF).
Inset: focus on the 335/365 nm portion of the spectra.
336, and 345 nm (Figure 3, solid lines). Despite the broadness
of these absorption bands, the four maxima fit well with both
those of 1a6 and those of known chromophores containing
the “phenyl-fluorene-phenyl” moieties.14,15 The broader
spectra of 1b-d, compared with that of 1a, are rationalized
by the combined contributions of two chromophores (namely,
the “phenyl-fluorene-phenyl” moieties and the indeno[1,2-
b]fluorene core) and by the rotational freedom of the phenyl
rings around the C-C bonds joining the fluorene and phenyl
units.16 Thus, despite the extension of conjugation of the
fluorene units with the phenyl rings, the lowest energy
transition is assigned to the indeno[1,2-b]fluorene core and
is detected at 345 nm for all molecules, as previously
observed for 1a. For the phenyl-substituted DSF-IFs 2b-d,
the UV-vis absorption spectra (Figure 3, dashed lines) also
exhibit broad bands, with two maxima at ca. 323 and 340
nm. The lowest energy transition at 340 nm is found for all
DSF-IFs 2b-d and fits well with that of 2a. This transition
is ascribed to the indeno[2,1-a]fluorene core, similarly to the
above discussion on the DSF-IF 1 molecules. In addition,
the band in 2b-d observed at ca. 320 nm is assigned to the
“phenyl-fluorene-phenyl” moieties and is blue-shifted com-
pared to the corresponding large split band (330/336 nm) of
1b-d. Another significant feature is the absorption onset of
2b-d, which is always found at higher intensity and
wavelength than those of 1b-d, respectively (see inset of
Figure 3 focusing on the low energy part of the spectra).
Similar features in the absorption spectra of other molecular
systems containing two chromophores in a face-to-face
arrangement have been previously reported in the literature
and assigned to intramolecular excitonic interactions in the
ground state.17-20
Figure 4. )
Emission spectra (10-6 M in THF) of (a) 1a-d (λexc
345 nm); (b) 2a-d (λexc ) 340 nm). (c) Fluorescence decay curves
of 1a-b/2a-b (THF). λexc ) 330 nm, λem ) 375 nm (1a-b, 2a)
or 450 nm (2b).
band (with respect to 1b-d) is observed with maxima,
respectively, at 450, 413, and 454 nm (Figure 4b). At this
stage, this large band can be tentatively assigned to an
intramolecular excimer formation, as previously observed for
example by Scherf and co-workers for oligophenyl based
cruciforms.23 Moreover, and in contrast to 1b-d, the Stokes
shifts become extremely large, i.e. 110 nm (2b), 73 nm (2c),
and 114 nm (2d), highlighting the dramatic effect of the face-
(14) Liao, Y.-L.; Lin, C.-Y.; Liu, Y.-H.; Wong, K.-T.; Hung, W.-Y.;
Chen, W.-J. Chem. Commun. 2007, 1831–1833
(15) Schneider, D.; Rabe, T.; Dobbertin, T.; Kro¨ger, M.; Becker, E.;
Johannes, H.-H.; Kowalsky, W.; Weimann, T.; Wang, J.; Hinze, P.; Gerhard,
.
A.; Sto¨ssel, P.; Vestweber, H. AdV. Mater. 2005, 17, 31–34
.
(16) Belleteˆte, M.; Ranger, M.; Beaupre´, S.; Leclerc, M.; Durocher, G.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 316, 101–107.
(17) Person, R. V.; Peterson, B. R.; Lightner, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 42–59
(18) Lewis, F. D.; Kurth, T. L.; Liu, W. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci.
2002, 1, 30–37
.
.
(19) Lewis, F. D.; Kurth, T. L. Can. J. Chem. 2003, 81, 770–776
.
(21) The Stokes shift is defined in this work as λem - λabs (in nm) .
(22) Merlet, S.; Birau, M.; Wang, Z. Y. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2157–2159.
(23) Nehls, B. S.; Galbrecht, F.; Bilge, A.; Brauer, D. J.; Lehmann,
C. W.; Scherf, U.; Farrell, T. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 3, 3213–3219.
(20) Benten, H.; Ohkita, H.; Ito, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Sakumoto, N.; Hori,
K.; Tohda, Y.; Tani, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Nishimura, J. J. Phys. Chem. B
2005, 109, 19681–19687
.
4796
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 21, 2009