Reagents and General Synthetic Procedure. Tubacin was synthesized in the J.E.B.
laboratory (32). BTZ, CFZ, tubastatin A, and panobinostat were purchased
from Selleck Chemicals. Antibodies used in this study were purchased di-
reported by Tang et al. (33). All reactions were performed and monitored by
LCMS. The intermediates and final product were fully characterized with pro-
ton and carbon-13 NMR (1H NMR and 13C NMR) spectra and high-resolution
mass spectra (HRMS). Compounds were biochemically profiled against
HDAC1–9 as previously reported (14).
HDAC6/aggresome inhibition may be more broadly applicable
to cancers other than MM. Malignant cells generally have higher
protein synthesis rates than their normal counterparts, making
them more prone to protein aggregation and perhaps more
sensitive to proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis. Inhibition
of proteasome activity has been demonstrated to induce proa-
poptotic ER stress in pancreatic carcinoma (25), head and neck
cancer (26), and nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (27).
Mechanistic and translational biology has moved in vivo, and
so must the field of chemical biology. The availability of tubacin
has provided significant insights into HDAC6 biology. Since the
development of tubacin, additional HDAC6 inhibitors have been
described, such as tubastatin A and, more recently, N-hydroxy-4-
{[N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-phenylacetamido]methyl} benzamide (HPB)
and an aminopyrrolidinone HDAC6 inhibitor (28–30). When these
molecules are validated in vivo, we anticipate an informative and
structurally diverse set of chemical probes of HDAC6 to drive further
mechanistic exploration and definitive clinical translation in cancer
and nonmalignant diseases.
Cell Lines. MM.1S, NCI-H929, RPMI8226, and U266 cells were obtained
from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The KMS11 cell line was
obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (JCRB)
Cell Bank. OPM-2 cells were purchased from Deutsche Sammlung von
Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (German Collection of Microor-
ganisms and Cell Cultures). ANBL-6 and ANBL-6-VR5 cell lines were kindly
provided by Robert Orlowski, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Statistical Analysis. The statistical significance of differences observed in drug-
treated versus control cultures was determined using the Wilcoxon signed-
ranks test.
Materials and Methods
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. This study was supported by NIH Grants SPORE
CA10070, P01 78378, and R01 CA50947 (to K.C.A.), R01 CA178264 (to T.H. and
K.C.A.), R01 GM38627 (to S.L.S.), K08 CA128972 (to J.E.B.), T32 HL07623-18
(to J.E.B.), and R01 CA152314 (to J.E.B. and O.W.); a Burroughs-Wellcome Foun-
dation Career Award for Medical Scientists (to J.E.B.); the Doris Duke Charitable
Foundation (J.E.B.); and National Science Foundation Grant TG-CHE090124 (to
O.W.). K.C.A. is an American Cancer Society Clinical Research Professor.
All experiments with patient samples were performed according to a protocol
approved by the Institutional Review Board of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
All animal studies were conducted according to protocols approved by the
Animal Ethics Committee of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Mice used in
this study were handled in compliance with the NIH Guide for the Care and
Use of Laboratory Animals (31).
1. Hideshima T, Mitsiades C, Tonon G, Richardson PG, Anderson KC (2007) Under-
standing multiple myeloma pathogenesis in the bone marrow to identify new ther-
apeutic targets. Nat Rev Cancer 7(8):585–598.
18. Haggarty SJ, Koeller KM, Wong JC, Butcher RA, Schreiber SL (2003) Multidimensional
chemical genetic analysis of diversity-oriented synthesis-derived deacetylase inhibi-
tors using cell-based assays. Chem Biol 10(5):383–396.
2. Badros AZ, et al. (2013) Carfilzomib in multiple myeloma patients with renal im-
pairment: Pharmacokinetics and safety. Leukemia 27(8):1707–1714.
3. Garcia-Gomez A, et al. (2014) Preclinical activity of the oral proteasome inhibitor
MLN9708 in Myeloma bone disease. Clin Cancer Res 20(6):1542–1554.
4. Hideshima T, et al. (2005) Small-molecule inhibition of proteasome and aggresome
function induces synergistic antitumor activity in multiple myeloma. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 102(24):8567–8572.
5. Stessman HA, et al. (2013) Profiling bortezomib resistance identifies secondary ther-
apies in a mouse myeloma model. Mol Cancer Ther 12(6):1140–1150.
6. Lichter DI, et al. (2012) Sequence analysis of β-subunit genes of the 20S proteasome in
patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib or dexametha-
sone. Blood 120(23):4513–4516.
7. Hideshima T, Richardson PG, Anderson KC (2011) Mechanism of action of proteasome
inhibitors and deacetylase inhibitors and the biological basis of synergy in multiple
myeloma. Mol Cancer Ther 10(11):2034–2042.
8. Bennett EJ, Bence NF, Jayakumar R, Kopito RR (2005) Global impairment of the
ubiquitin-proteasome system by nuclear or cytoplasmic protein aggregates precedes
inclusion body formation. Mol Cell 17(3):351–365.
9. Kovacs JJ, et al. (2005) HDAC6 regulates Hsp90 acetylation and chaperone-dependent
activation of glucocorticoid receptor. Mol Cell 18(5):601–607.
10. Dimopoulos M, et al. (2013) Vorinostat or placebo in combination with bortezomib in
patients with multiple myeloma (VANTAGE 088): A multicentre, randomised, double-
blind study. Lancet Oncol 14(11):1129–1140.
11. San-Miguel JF, et al. (2014) Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus
placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed
and refractory multiple myeloma: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 3
trial. Lancet Oncol 15(11):1195–1206.
12. Frye SV (2010) The art of the chemical probe. Nat Chem Biol 6(3):159–161.
13. Sternson SM, Wong JC, Grozinger CM, Schreiber SL (2001) Synthesis of 7200 small
molecules based on a substructural analysis of the histone deacetylase inhibitors
trichostatin and trapoxin. Org Lett 3(26):4239–4242.
19. Gorman AM, Healy SJ, Jäger R, Samali A (2012) Stress management at the ER: Fegulators
of ER stress-induced apoptosis. Pharmacol Ther 134(3):306–316.
20. Desplanques G, et al. (2009) Impact of XIAP protein levels on the survival of myeloma
cells. Haematologica 94(1):87–93.
21. Korting HC, Schäfer-Korting M (1999) The Benefit/Risk Ratio: A Handbook for the
Rational Use of Potentially Hazardous Drugs (CRC, Boca Raton).
22. Kikuchi S, et al. (2015) Class IIa HDAC inhibition enhances ER stress-mediated cell
death in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 29(9):1918–1927.
23. Hideshima T, et al. (2014) Induction of differential apoptotic pathways in multiple
myeloma cells by class-selective histone deacetylase inhibitors. Leukemia 28(2):
457–460.
24. Santo L, et al. (2012) Preclinical activity, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic
properties of a selective HDAC6 inhibitor, ACY-1215, in combination with bortezomib
in multiple myeloma. Blood 119(11):2579–2589.
25. Nawrocki ST, et al. (2005) Bortezomib inhibits PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum (ER)
kinase and induces apoptosis via ER stress in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer
Res 65(24):11510–11519.
26. Fribley A, Wang CY (2006) Proteasome inhibitor induces apoptosis through induction
of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cancer Biol Ther 5(7):745–748.
27. Morgillo F, et al. (2011) Antitumor activity of bortezomib in human cancer cells with
acquired resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibi-
tors. Lung Cancer 71(3):283–290.
28. Butler KV, et al. (2010) Rational design and simple chemistry yield a superior, neuroprotective
HDAC6 inhibitor, tubastatin A. J Am Chem Soc 132(31):10842–10846.
29. Lee JH, et al. (2015) Creation of a histone deacetylase 6 inhibitor and its biological
effects [corrected]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(39):12005–12010.
30. Lin X, et al. (2015) Design and synthesis of orally bioavailable aminopyrrolidinone
histone deacetylase 6 inhibitors. J Med Chem 58(6):2809–2820.
31. Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (1996) Guide for the Care and Use
of Laboratory Animals (Natl Inst Health, Bethesda), DHHS Publ No (NIH) 85-23.
32. Wong JC, Hong R, Schreiber SL (2003) Structural biasing elements for in-cell histone
deacetylase paralog selectivity. J Am Chem Soc 125(19):5586–5587.
33. Tang W, Luo T, Greenberg EF, Bradner JE, Schreiber SL (2011) Discovery of histone
deacetylase 8 selective inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 21(9):2601–2605.
34. Case DA, et al. (2008) AMBER 10. (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.).
35. Wang D, Helquist P, Wiest O (2007) Zinc binding in HDAC inhibitors: A DFT study.
J Org Chem 72(14):5446–5449.
14. Bradner JE, et al. (2010) Chemical phylogenetics of histone deacetylases. Nat Chem
Biol 6(3):238–243.
15. Haggarty SJ, Koeller KM, Wong JC, Grozinger CM, Schreiber SL (2003) Domain-selective
small-molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-mediated tubulin deacetylation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(8):4389–4394.
16. Estiu G, et al. (2008) Structural origin of selectivity in class II-selective histone deacetylase
inhibitors. J Med Chem 51(10):2898–2906.
36. Hideshima T, et al. (2009) Biologic sequelae of IkappaB kinase (IKK) inhibition in
multiple myeloma: Therapeutic implications. Blood 113(21):5228–5236.
17. Vegas AJ, et al. (2007) Fluorous-based small-molecule microarrays for the discovery of
histone deacetylase inhibitors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 46(42):7960–7964.
6 of 6
|
Hideshima et al.