C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
lithium cacodylate) by molecular crowding/partial dehydration in
40% polyethylene glycol 200 (PEG).22 Under these conditions,
cations are absent or only weakly bound in the central cavities of
each G-quadruplex.22 For all DNAs evaluated, PEG-mediated
folding resulted in G-quadruplex structures exhibiting cooperative
and reversible folding, as well as highly variable thermal stabilities
(Figure 1E,G). Interestingly, very little energy transfer was observed
in the PEG-folded G-quadruplexes under salt-deficient conditions
(ηt ≈ 0.02-0.07, Figure 1F,G). Quadruplexes prepared in the
presence of both PEG and 110 mM Na+, in contrast, exhibited
energy transfer efficiencies similar to that for the samples prepared
in 110 mM Na+ (ηt ≈ 0.30, Figure 1F,G). Nonspecific electrostatic
stabilization of backbone phosphate repulsion is not responsible
for the enhanced energy transfer, because PEG-folded G-quadru-
plexes prepared in 110 mM of tetrabutylammonium chloride
exhibited approximately the same energy transfer efficiencies as
the PEG-only samples. Taken together, these results suggest that
the G-quadruplex structure by itself is not sufficient for promoting
efficient energy transfer and that ions coordinated directly to the
O6 position of guanine residues play a critical role in mediating
energy transfer reactions in G-quadruplex structures.
electronically resemble emissive enol forms of guanine more than
the corresponding ion-free guanine residues.
Acknowledgment. We thank Professor Andrea Vasella, Dr.
Fabio De Giacomo, and Dr. Thomas Steinlin for providing
8-substituted guanines for initial fluorescence studies.25 Funding
was provided by the University of Zu¨rich Forschungskredit
#57131901 and the Swiss National Science Foundation #130074.
Supporting Information Available: The synthesis and characteriza-
tion of 2-3, additional fluorescence and CD data, and the procedures
for all experiments. This material is available free of charge via the
References
(1) For structures and physical properties, see: (a) Davis, J. T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 668. (b) Patel, D. J.; Phan, A. T.; Kuryavyi, V. Nucleic
Acids Res. 2007, 35, 7429. (c) Neidle, S.; Parkinson, G. N. Biochimie 2008,
90, 1184. (d) Lane, A. N.; Chaires, J. B.; Gray, R. D.; Trent, J. O. Nucleic
Acids Res. 2008, 36, 5482.
(2) For possible biological functions, see: (a) Sen, D.; Gilbert, W. Nature 1988,
334, 364. (b) Maizels, N. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 1055. (c)
Oganesian, L.; Bryan, T. M. Bioessays 2007, 29, 155. (d) Huppert, J. L.;
Balasubramanian, S. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 406. (e) Qin, Y.; Hurley,
L. H. Biochimie 2008, 90, 1149. (f) Hershman, S. G.; Chen, Q.; Lee, J. Y.;
Kozak, M. L.; Yue, P.; Wang, L. S.; Johnson, F. B. Nucleic Acids Res.
2008, 36, 144. (g) Luedtke, N. W. Chimia 2009, 63, 134. (h) Cahoon, L. A.;
Seifert, H. S. Science 2009, 325, 764.
(3) For materials, see: (a) Sessler, J. L.; Sathiosatham, M.; Doerr, K.; Lynch,
V.; Abboud, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1300. (b) Calzolari,
A.; Di Felice, R.; Molinari, E.; Garbesi, A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80,
3331. (c) Davis, J. T.; Spada, G. P. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 296. (d)
Karimata, H.; Miyoshi, D.; Fujimoto, T.; Koumoto, K.; Wang, Z. M.;
Sugimoto, N. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. (Oxf) 2007, 251. (e) Borovok, N.;
Iram, N.; Zikich, D.; Ghabboun, J.; Livshits, G. I.; Porath, D.; Kotlyar,
A. B. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 5050. (f) Betancourt, J. E.; Rivera,
J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16666. (g) Rivera-Sanchez Mdel, C.;
Andujar-de-Sanctis, I.; Garcia-Arriaga, M.; Gubala, V.; Hobley, G.; Rivera,
J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10403.
(4) (a) Delaney, S.; Barton, J. K. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 14159. (b) Chinnapen,
D. J. F.; Sen, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 65. (c) Huang,
Y. C.; Cheng, A. K.; Yu, H. Z.; Sen, D. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 6794.
(5) (a) Alberti, P.; Mergny, J. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 1569.
(b) Alberti, P.; Bourdoncle, A.; Sacca, B.; Lacroix, L.; Mergny, J. L. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 3383. (c) Lubitz, I.; Borovok, N.; Kotlyar, A.
Biochemistry 2007, 46, 12925.
(6) (a) Markovitsi, D.; Gustavsson, T.; Sharonov, A. Photochem. Photobiol.
2004, 79, 526. (b) Gepshtein, R.; Huppert, D.; Lubitz, I.; Amdursky, N.;
Kotlyar, A. B. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 12249. (c) Miannay, F. A.;
Banyasz, A.; Gustavsson, T.; Markovitsi, D. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113,
11760. (d) Mendez, M. A.; Szalai, V. A. Biopolymers 2009, 91, 841.
(7) (a) Kelley, S. O.; Barton, J. K. Science 1999, 283, 375. (b) Xu, D. G.;
Nordlund, T. M. Biophys. J. 2000, 78, 1042. (c) O’Neill, M. A.; Barton,
J. K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 16543. (d) O’Neill, M. A.;
Dohno, C.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1316. (e) Nordlund,
T. M. Photochem. Photobiol. 2007, 83, 625.
(8) (a) Kimura, T.; Kawai, K.; Fujitsuka, M.; Majima, T. Tetrahedron 2007,
63, 3585. (b) Gray, R. D.; Petraccone, L.; Trent, J. O.; Chaires, J. B.
Biochemistry 2010, 49, 179.
(9) Gros, J.; Rosu, F.; Amrane, S.; De Cian, A.; Gabelica, V.; Lacroix, L.;
Mergny, J. L. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 3064.
Previous studies proposed that G-G base-stacking, hydrogen
bonding, and/or restricted motions within G-quadruplex structures
can enhance the photoexcited lifetimes and quantum yields of
guanine residues.6 To evaluate the impact of cation binding on the
quantum yields of unmodified guanine residues, we prepared
unmodified G-quadruplexes from Telo(wt) in the presence of 40%
PEG under salt-deficient conditions or in the presence of 40% PEG
and 110 mM NaCl. While both samples were more fluorescent than
a comparable mixture of nucleotide monophosphates,11 samples
containing PEG and Na+ exhibited a higher quantum yield and red-
shifted emission as compared to the G-quadruplexes prepared in
40% PEG only (Figure S3, Supporting Information). These results
suggest that guanine-cation coordination is largely responsible for
the enhanced photoexcited lifetimes and quantum yields reported
for guanine residues in G-quadruplex structures.6 The enhanced
quantum yields of the unmodified guanine residues, in turn, facilitate
the unusually efficient DNA-to-2PyG energy transfer reactions
reported here.21
In summary, the incorporation of a single pyridine unit into
G-quadruplexes has provided a useful fluorescent probe for
monitoring G-quadruplex folding and revealed efficient intramo-
lecular energy transfer reactions in ion-containing G-quadruplex
structures. We used 2PyG in conjunction with PEG-promoted
G-quadruplex folding to dissect the multiple roles metal ions play
in mediating both G-quadruplex folding and energy transfer. Given
the growing interest in G-quadruplex-based devices and materials,3,5
these results may provide important design principles toward
harnessing the potentially useful photophysical properties of G-
quadruplex wires and related structures.5,6 Elucidating the exact
mechanism of cation-mediated energy transfer will require ad-
ditional studies, but our results suggest that the enhanced quantum
yields of unmodified guanine residues upon O6 ion coordination
are responsible for the unusually efficient energy transfer reactions
mediated by G-quadruplex structures.21 Interestingly, the O6
carbonyl stretching frequencies of guanine residues are known to
decrease upon NH4+-mediated quadruplex folding,23 and the
“trapped enol” mimic O6,9-dimethylguanine is known to be highly
fluorescent when protonated.24 Taken together, these results suggest
that the ion-coordinated guanine residues in G-quadruplexes may
(10) (a) Hawkins, M. E.; Pfleiderer, W.; Balis, F. M.; Porter, D.; Knutson, J. R.
Anal. Biochem. 1997, 244, 86. (b) Hawkins, M. E. Cell. Biochem. Biophys.
2001, 34, 257.
(11) See Supporting Information for synthetic and experimental details.
(12) Interestingly, 2PyG exhibits a 2-fold higher quantum yield in D2O than in
H2O, and 8-phenyl-2′-deoxyguanosine exhibits approximately the same
quantum yield in H2O, D2O, and acetonitrile (Φ ≈ 0.6). These results
suggest that water-mediated quenching of 2PyG involves proton transfer
between the pyridyl nitrogen and bulk solvent. We speculated that, upon
G-quadruplex folding, the pyridyl nitrogen of 2PyG would become protected
from bulk solvent to provide a fluorescence enhancement.
(13) ηt is defined as the number of photons transferred from active nucleobase
donors to 2PyG divided by the total number of photons absorbed by all
nucleobases at 260 nm.7b,e The reported efficiencies (Figure 1G) therefore
provide a lower limit for the transfer efficiencies of the active donors.
(14) (a) Firth, A. G.; Fairlamb, I. J. S.; Darley, K.; Baumann, C. G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 3529. (b) Greco, N. J.; Tor, Y. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 3515.
(c) Ogasawara, S.; Saito, I.; Maeda, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 2479.
(d) Butler, R. S.; Cohn, P.; Tenzel, P.; Abboud, K. A.; Castellano, R. K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 623.
(15) (a) Birnbaum, G. I.; Lassota, P.; Shugar, D. Biochemistry 1984, 23, 5048.
(b) Dias, E.; Battiste, J. L.; Williamson, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 4479. (c) He, G. X.; Krawczyk, S. H.; Swaminathan, S.; Shea, R. G.;
Dougherty, J. P.; Terhorst, T.; Law, V. S.; Griffin, L. C.; Coutre´, S.;
Bischofberger, N. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2234. (d) Gaied, N. B.; Glasser,
9
18006 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 51, 2010