with arene substitution can represent a technical challenge
in many instances. Traditional methods have included the
addition of cyanogen bromide to aniline6 or the addition of
amines to functionalized thioureas.7 However, cyanogen
bromide is quite hazardous, limiting its attractiveness as a
starting material. Methods utilizing substituted thioureas are
not direct, requiring the separate preparation of each precur-
sor. Therefore we sought to develop a direct catalytic
guanidinylation of aryl halides for access to N,N′-diaryl
guanidines we desired for biological testing.
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for the
Copper-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of Guanidine Nitrate with
2-Iodotoluene
Copper-mediated Ullmann8 (C-C, C-N, or C-O bond
formation) and Goldberg9 (C-N bond formation with
amides) reactions have been used for decades in a variety
of applications, including industrial processes. A limitation
of this chemistry is the use of stoichiometric amounts of
copper. However, a more important consideration is probably
the limits on reactivity. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling
reactions are widely used alternatives for similar bond-
forming reactions. However, despite the great success of
these methods, alternative procedures utilizing an inexpensive
metal like copper are highly desirable.10 Recently, catalysts
employing copper in conjunction with suitable ligands have
played an important role in opening new possibilities for the
development of efficient catalytic C-N bond-forming pro-
cesses.11 Buchwald and Kwong reported that N,N-diethyl-
salicylamide and its analogues were excellent ligands for
copper in the cross-coupling of amines with aryl bromides,
even in a solvent-free environment.12
Since the double arylation of guanidines is not commonly
found in the literature, the development of a mild, cost-
effective, and straightforward copper-catalyzed method using
commercially available guanidine nitrate and aryl halides
would be potentially beneficial. Perhaps the closest meth-
odology in the literature for the direct arylation of guanidines
was the work of Deng and co-workers that focused on the
copper-catalyzed formation of substituted benzimidazoles.13
Importantly, the creation of structural analogues to DTG
could provide for new biological testing, as related to
ischemic stroke, of the arylated guanidine analogues.14
We initiated our studies by exploring conditions that
enabled copper-catalyzed cross-coupling using 1 mmol of
each substrate at 0.2 M, 10 mol % of CuI, 6 equiv of base,
entrya
solvent
toluene
ether
DME
DCM
1,4-dioxane
THF
ethanol
DMF
DMSO
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
temp, °C
yield, %d e
,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
110
25
80
40
110
95
80
80
80
20
40
60
80
100
80
80
17
0
0
0
24
0
0
10
0
0
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15b
16c
89
92
88
82
32
a The reaction used 1 mmol of guanidine nitrate and 1 mmol of
2-iodotoluene. b CuBr was used in place of CuI. c Anhydrous CuCl was
used. d Isoated yields. e 0.2 M in substrate.
and 20 mol % of N,N-diethylsalicylamide as a ligand. It
should be noted that the yield was determined with the aryl
halide as the limiting reagent, as an excess of guanidine was
required for the double arylation. When 2 equiv or more of
the aryl halide (correct stoichiometry for double arylation)
was used, a mixture of di- and triarylation products, with
lower overall yield, was found. After screening various
solvents, double amination was found to proceed efficiently
in acetonitrile, allowing for a 92% yield (Table 1, entry 13).
Other coordinating solvents such as diethyl ether and THF,
along with protic solvents such as ethanol, resulted in
conditions where low yields were obtained (entries 2, 6, and
7). Toluene, dioxane, and DMF were suitable solvents at
higher temperatures, but a diminished yield of the product
was found (entries 1, 5, and 8). The optimal temperature for
reaction in acetonitrile was determined to be 80 °C, with
lower or higher temperatures allowing for decreased yield
(entries 10-12, 14). Other copper salts such as CuBr and
CuCl (anhydrous) were metal sources capable of catalyzing
the reaction, but inferior results compared to that of the CuI
salt were found (entries 15 and 16).
(6) Weber, E.; Sonder, M.; Quarum, M.; McLean, S.; Pou, S.; Keana,
J. F. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1986, 83, 8784.
(7) (a) Bergfeld, M. et al. U.S. Patent 4,898,978, 1990. (b) For a review
on guanidine methods, see: Katritzy, A.; Rogovoy, B. V. ArkiVoc 2005, iV,
49. (c) Powell, D. A.; Ramsden, P. D.; Batey, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 2300. (d) Powell, D. A.; Batey, R. A. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2362.
(8) (a) Ullmann, F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1903, 36, 2382. (b) Ma, D.;
Zhang, Y.; Yao, J.; Wu, S.; Tao, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12459.
(c) Fagan, P. J.; Hauptman, E.; Shapiro, R.; Casalnuovo, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 5043. (d) Lang, F.; Zewge, D.; Houpis, I.; Volante, R. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3251.
(9) Goldberg, I. Ber. Dtsch. Ges. 1906, 39, 1691.
(10) (a) Tundel, R. E.; Anderson, K. W.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 430. (b) Quach, T. D.; Batey, R. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4397.
(11) (a) Shafir, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8742.
(b) Antilla, J. C.; Baskin, J. M.; Barder, T.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 5578. (c) Klapars, A.; Antilla, J. C.; Huang, X.; Buchwald, S. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7723.
(14) Cortes-Salva, M.; Behensky, A.; Ajmo, C.; Pennypacker, K.;
Cuevas, J.; Antilla, J. Design, synthesis and eValuation of guanidine analogs
as potential drugs for stroke therapeutics; Presented at the 237th American
Chemical Society National Meeting, March, 2009, Salt Lake City, UT; no.
1216243.
(12) (a) Kwong, F. Y.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
581. (b) Kwong, F. Y.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 793.
(13) Deng, X.; McAllister, H.; Mani, N. S. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
5742.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 6, 2010
1317