access by inhibitors. Furthermore, the polysaccharide back-
bone of peptidoglycan remains conserved in methicillin-
resistant strains; thus, antibiotics targeting the transglyco-
sylation (TG) step may therefore be less liable to resistance.3
However, the study of transglycosylation for drug discovery
has been hampered by the difficulty in acquirement and
modification of the TGase substrate 1. Isolation of 1 from
bacterial sources is extremely difficult and tedious due to
its low natural abundance and its inherent structural com-
plexity.4 Fortunately, synthetic approaches toward 1 and its
analogues via chemical or chemo-enzymatic methods have
shed light on this study.5-7 For example, the Lipid II
analogue 2 bearing a fluorophore of the dansyl group at the
lysine residue of the pentapeptide chain has been prepared
(Figure 2).8 A chemo-enzymatic approach has culminated
betulaheptaprenyl lipid chain (C35) with defined double bond
configurations is a better TGase substrate than the natural Lipid
II with the C55 lipid chain.9 The transglycosylation products
usually contain mixtures of immature peptidoglycans with
varying degrees of polymerization that are not easily quantified.
The formed immature peptidoglycan can be subjected to
enzymatic cleavage by N-acetylmuramidase to release the
GlcNAc-MurNAc-pentapeptide molecules, the truncated Lipid
II without the moiety of undecaprenyl diphosphate.8,10
During the course of our research on the development of
new antibiotics that target TGase in bacteria,11,12 we explored
an efficient method for the preparation of polyprenyl alcohols
with varying chain lengths and double bond configurations
via solution- and solid-phase organic synthesis.13 We have
also prepared the fluorescent Lipid II (2)8 and its analogues
3-5 carrying a dansyl tag at the terminal ε-NH2 site of lysine
(see Supporting Information). In accord with our expecta-
tions, the dansyl-labeled Lipid II (2) and analogue 4, bearing
a betulaheptaprenyl chain, are active substrates for TGase.
Compound 3 bearing a benzene ring at the end of the lipid
chain is still an active substrate toward transglycosylation,
whereas compound 5 with a pentaprenyl chain is inert to
TGase. Inspired by this result, we proposed that compound
7 would be a possible substrate that could further improve
the TGase assay (Figure 3). Compound 7 incorporates a
Figure 2. Structures of Lipid II analogues 2-5 bearing a fluorescent
tag at the ε-NH2 site of lysine.
in the syntheses of radioactive Lipid II and several analogues
with all glucosamine carbons having 14C-labeling.9 The assay
systems for evaluation of the TGase activity have thus been
established with the assistance of the fluorescent or radioac-
tive Lipid II substrates.8,9
Walker and co-workers have shown, in their assay using
radioactive substrate, that a Lipid II analogue containing the
Figure 3. A schematic diagram for design of the fluorescent TGase
substrate 7 by mimicking a truncated Lipid II analogue 6 via an
imaginary transformation A.
(3) Ritter, T. K.; Wong, C.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3508–
3533.
(4) (a) van Heijenoort, Y.; Gomez, M.; Derrien, M.; Ayala, J.; van
Heijenoort, J. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 3549–3557. (b) Nakagawa, J.; Tamaki,
S.; Tomioka, S.; Matsuhashi, M. J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259, 13937–13946.
(5) (a) VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Mauldin, S. C.; Zia-Ebrahimi, M.;
Winger, B. E.; Hornback, W. J.; Saha, S. L.; Aikins, J. A.; Blaszczak, L. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3656–3660. (b) Schwartz, B.; Markwalder,
dansyl group into the lipid chain for facile detection of the
progress of transglycosylation. The dansyl group can be
J. A.; Wang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11638–11643
.
(6) Lo, M.-C.; Men, H.; Branstrom, A.; Helm, J.; Yao, N.; Goldman,
(10) (a) Hsu, S.-T. D.; Breukink, E.; Tischenko, E.; Lutters, M. A. G.;
de Kruijff, B.; Kaptein, R.; Bonvin, A. M. J. J.; van Nuland, N. A. J. Nat.
Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 963–967. (b) Baizman, E. R.; Branstrom, A. A.;
Longley, C. B.; Allanson, N.; Sofia, M. J.; Gange, D.; Goldman, R. C.
R.; Walker, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3540–3541
.
(7) Breukink, E.; van Heusden, H. E.; Vollmerhaus, P. J.; Swiezewska,
E.; Brunner, L.; Walker, S.; Heck, A. J. R.; de Kruijff, B. J. Biol. Chem.
2003, 278, 19898–19903
.
Microbiology 2000, 1463129-3140
.
(8) (a) Schwartz, B.; Markwalder, J. A.; Seitz, S. P.; Wang, Y.; Stein,
R. L. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 12552–12561. (b) Fraipont, C.; Sapunaric,
F.; Zervosen, A.; Auger, G.; Devreese, B.; Lioux, T.; Blanot, D.; Mengin-
Lecreulx, D.; Herdewijn, P.; Van Beeumen, J.; Frre, J.-M.; Nguyen-Distche,
M. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 4007–4013.
(11) Liu, H.; Wong, C.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 7187–7195
.
(12) Cheng, T.-J. R.; Sung, M.-D.; Liao, H.-Y.; Chang, Y.-F.; Chen,
C.-W.; Huang, C.-Y.; Chou, L.-Y.; Wu, Y.-D.; Chen, Y.-H.; Cheng, Y.-
S. E.; Wong, C.-H.; Ma, C.; Cheng, W.-C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2008, 105, 431–436
.
(9) Ye, X.-Y.; Lo, M.-C.; Brunner, L.; Walker, D.; Kahne, D.; Walker,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3155–3156.
(13) Chang, Y.-F.; Liu, C.-Y.; Guo, C.-W.; Wang, Y.-C.; Fang, J.-M.;
Cheng, W.-C. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7197–7203.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 7, 2010
1609