F. V. Singh et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 1671–1673
1673
der mild reaction conditions. The strength of this approach is that
Acknowledgments
the epoxidation of terminal double bond and oxidation of allylic
alcohol occurring in the same reaction under mild conditions and
permits flexibility of introducing an electron-donating or elec-
tron-accepting functionality in epoxy ketone cored aromatic
architectures.
The authors are grateful to FAPESP (Grant 07/59404-2, fellow-
ship process 07/51466-9, and CNPq 300.613/2007-5) for financial
support.
Prior to developing new m-CPBA-mediated oxidation reactions,
we focused on the synthesis of functionalized allylic alcohols. We
have synthesized compounds 1a–k by the nucleophilic addition
of (1-phenylvinyl)magnesium bromide to various aldehydes.14
After preparing the necessary allylic alcohols, we turned our
attention to the m-CPBA-mediated epoxidation of the terminal
double bonds in allylic alcohols 1a–k. 1,2-Diphenylprop-2-en-1-
ol (1a) was chosen as a model substrate, and a variety of conditions
were screened (Table 1). The reactions were monitored by TLC or
GC.
In order to find an appropriate catalyst for the epoxidation of
1,2-diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1a), we evaluated several transition
metal catalysts. The best result was obtained with PdCl2 (Table 2,
entry 1), and the product was formed in 81% yield.
We screened a number of solvents in this epoxidation reaction
(Table 2). The best result was achieved with dichloromethane
(DCM), and the product was obtained in 81% yield (Table 2, entry
1). In contrast, no product was formed when the reaction was
run in DMF, THF, or 1,4-dioxane.
Next, we focused on determining the optimal amount of
m-CPBA for this epoxidation reaction. We performed the same
reaction using 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 equiv of m-CPBA (Table 3, en-
tries 1–4), and the maximum yield (82%) of the desired product
(2a) was observed with 2.0 equiv of m-CPBA (entry 3).
The catalyst loadings were also evaluated (Table 3, entries 5–8),
and the best yield (83%) was obtained with 8 mol % of PdCl2 (Table
3, entry 7). However, using 5 mol % of PdCl2 provided the product
in nearly the same yield (82%) (Table 3, entry 6). As such, all the
subsequent experiments employed 5 mol % of PdCl2.
Our next step was to optimize the synthesis of phenyl(2-pheny-
loxiran-2-yl)methanone (2a) from diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1a)
(Table 4). The best conditions were found to include 1.0 equivalent
of 1,2-diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1a), 2.0 equiv of m-CPBA, and
5 mol % of PdCl2 in DCM; this mixture was stirred at room temper-
ature under nitrogen for 4 h. Using these optimized conditions, we
prepared a series of aryl(2-phenyloxiran-2-yl)methanones (com-
pounds 2a–k) (see Table 4).15
We found that the oxidation reaction was successful with both
electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substitutions on the
benzene ring, but in general, the products were obtained in better
yields when an electron-withdrawing substituent was present.
References and notes
1. Lange, J. H. M.; Coolen, H. K. A. C.; Stuivenberg, H. H.; Dijksman, J. A. R.;
Herremans, A. H. J.; Ronken, E.; Keizer, H. G.; Tipker, K.; McCreary, A. C.;
Veerman, W.; Wals, H. C.; Stork, B.; Verveer, P. C.; den Hartog, A. P.; de Jong, N.
M. J.; Adolfs, T. J. P.; Hoogendoorn, J.; Kruse, C. G. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 627.
2. Dickens, J. P.; Ellames, G. J.; Hare, N. J.; Lawson, K. R.; McKay, W. R.; Metters, A.
P.; Myers, P. L.; Pope, A. M. S.; Upton, R. M. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 2356.
3. Capriati, V.; Florio, S.; Luisi, R.; Nuzzo, I. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3330.
4. Ruf, S. G.; Dietz, J.; Regitz, M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6259.
5. Donnelly, J. A.; Maloney, D. E. Tetrahedron 1979, 35, 2875.
6. Varga, M.; Batori, S.; Kövari-Radkai, M.; Prohaszka-Nemet, I.; Vitanyi-Morvai,
M.; Böcskey, Z.; Bokotey, S.; Simon, K.; Hermecz, I. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 3911.
7. Pierre, J. L.; Guidoti, R.; Arnaud, P. Bull. Soc. Chim. France 1967, 4, 1439.
8. (a) Griesbaum, K.; Zwick, G. Chemische Berichte 1986, 119, 229; (b) Griesbaum,
K.; Zwick, G. Chemische Berichte 1985, 118, 3041.
9. Huenig, S.; Marschner, C. Chemische Berichte 1990, 123, 107.
10. Kroutil, W.; Lasterra-Sanchez, M. E.; Maddrell, S. J.; Mayon, P.; Morgan, P.;
Roberts, S. M.; Thornton, S. R.; Todd, C. J.; Tuter, M. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1
1996, 23, 2837.
11. Hartung, R. E.; Paquette, L. A. Heterocycles 2004, 64, 23.
12. Cella, J. A.; McGrath, J. P.; Kelley, J. A.; Soukkary, O. E.; Hilpert, L. J. Org. Chem.
1977, 42, 2079.
13. Singh, F. V.; Milagre, H. M. S.; Eberlin, M. N.; Stefani, H. A. Tetrahedron Lett.
2009, 50, 2312.
14. General procedure for the synthesis of 1,2-diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol derivatives 1a–
k: a solution of 1-bromo-1-phenylethylene (10 mmol) in THF (20 mL) was
added dropwise to magnesium metal (0.264 g, 11 mmol) and
a catalytic
amount of iodine at room temperature under a N2 atmosphere. After the Mg
was consumed, corresponding aldehyde (10 mmol) was added in one portion
at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred vigorously for 4–14 h at room temperature.
The reaction mixture was neutralized with NH4Cl solution, and the resulting
solution was poured into water and was extracted with ethyl acetate. The
organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and was evaporated under vacuum. The
pure compound was isolated in good yield after purification via flash column
chromatography using 15–20% ethyl acetate in hexane as the eluent. 1,2-
Diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1a): Yield: 81%; yellow oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 2.18 (br s, 1H, OH), 5.45 (s, 1H, CH), 5.48 (s, 1H, CH), 5.67 (s, 1H, CH), 7.18–
7.39 (m, 10H, ArH); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 74.24, 114.24, 127.19, 127.25,
127.84, 127.97, 128.46, 128.66, 139.59, 142.08; CG/MS: m/z (relative, %) 210
(27), 107 (42), 104 (100), 79 (44), 77 (48). 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-phenylprop-2-
en-1-ol (1b): Yield: 78%; yellow oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 2.18 (br s, 1H,
OH), 5.46 (s, 1H, CH), 5.50 (s, 1H, CH), 5.68 (s, 1H, CH), 7.22–7.40 (m, 9H, ArH);
13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 75.18, 114.11, 126.80, 127.62, 128.10, 128.14,
128.38, 133.27, 138.74, 140.08, 150.03; CG/MS: m/z (relative, %) 244 (36), 104
(100), 93 (41), 77 (67).
15. General procedure for the synthesis of a,b-epoxy ketones 1a–k: a solution of the
olefinic alcohol (1a–k) (0.5 mmol) in dichloromethane (5 mL) in a two-necked
round-bottomed flask was cooled to À78 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere. A
solution of m-chloroperbenzoic acid (172 mg, 1.0 mmol) in dichloromethane
(5 mL) was added dropwise. Next, PdCl2 (4.4 mg, 5 mol %) was added, and the
reaction solution was stirred for 4–14 h at room temperature. The reaction
mixture was diluted with DCM and was washed sequentially with brine and
10% NaOH solution. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and then was
evaporated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash column
chromatography using 8–10% ethyl acetate in hexane as the eluent. Phenyl(2-
phenyloxiran-2-yl)methanone (2a)8: Yield: 81%; colorless oil; 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 3.09 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 3.24 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H, 2CH),
7.20–7.35 (m, 10H, ArH); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 55.07, 125.39, 127.92,
129.29, 128.55, 128.59, 128.84, 130.00, 130.07, 132.42, 133.78, 134.54, 137.63,
196.78; CG/MS: m/z (relative, %) 224 (17), 208 (12), 121 (63), 105 (100), 91
(39), 77 (33). (4-Chlorophenyl)(2-phenyloxiran-2-yl)methanone (2b): Yield: 85%;
colorless oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 2.99 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.31 (d,
J = 5.4 Hz, 1H, CH), 7.18–7.41 (m, 7H, ArH), 7.90 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, ArH); 13C
NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 55.13, 63.10, 125.29, 128.42, 128.62, 129.10, 129.97,
131.38, 132.26, 135.26, 140.34, 193.53; CG/MS: m/z (relative, %) 258 (13), 242
(6), 165 (15), 141 (32), 139 (100), 119 (62), 105 (26), 91 (60).
This reaction was also successful with
a-alkyl olefinic alcohols 1j
and 1k.
2. Conclusion
In summary, we have identified a simple and useful approach
for synthesizing ,b-epoxy ketones by palladium-catalyzed
a
a
epoxidation–oxidation sequence; this process uses functionalized
terminal allylic alcohols as substrates and m-CPBA as the stoichi-
ometric oxidant. The strength of this approach is that the epoxida-
tion of terminal double bond and oxidation of allylic alcohol
occurring during same reaction under mild conditions and permits
flexibility of introducing an electron-donating or electron-accept-
ing functionality in epoxy ketone cored aromatic architectures.