Venkatesan et al.
JOCNote
SCHEME 3. Proposed Synthesis of Quinoline-3-carboxylic
Acid Ester
TABLE 1. Synthesis of 6-Chloroquinoline-3-carboxylic Acid Methyl
Ester from 2-Amino-5-chlorobenzaldehyde
of the reaction using acidic as well as basic conditions.7
However, to the best of our knowledge, only one synthesis
of 2,4-unsubstituted quinoline-3-carboxylic acid utilizing the
Friedlander reaction starting from a substituted 2-amino-
benzaldehyde has been disclosed and is of limited practical
value due to the low overall yield (13%).8 Moreover, the
aldehyde partner that is required to affect this transforma-
tion, 3-oxo-propionic acid ethyl ester, is not readily available
commercially, although it can be synthesized in a single step.9
In contrast, the corresponding ethyl acetal is both inexpen-
sive and commercially available. This synthon shares the
parent aldehyde’s reactivity profile under the Friedlander
conditions and we elected to investigate this reagent in the
Friedlander reaction. Herein, we report a rapid, modified
Friedlander synthesis of aryl-substituted quinoline-3-carbo-
xylic acid esters from commercially available ethyl 3,3-di-
ethoxypropionate and o-nitrobenzaldehydes (Scheme 3).
At first, we elected to test the viability of the cyclization
reaction using 2-amino-5-chlorobenzaldehyde under a vari-
ety of acidic conditions (Table 1). We were pleased to find
that treatment of 5-chloro-2-aminobenzaldehyde with 3,3-
dimethoxy methyl propionate in the presence of 4 M HCl in
dioxane at room temperature yielded the desired product,
albeit in low yield (entry 1). Heating the reaction mixture to
reflux did not improve the yield of the reaction (entry 2).
However, heating the reaction mixture with AcOH resulted
in good yield of the product (entry 3). Acids such as TFA,
MsOH, and CSA led to considerable decomposition and
moderate yields of product (entries 4, 5, and 6). The use of
PPTS in THF led to moderate yields of the desired product
(entry 7). We found that, performing the reaction in toluene
or THF using p-TsOH under refluxing conditions provided
the best yields of 6-chloroethyl quinoline-3-carboxylate
(67% and 76% respectively, entries 9 and 10). We have per-
formed the optimized procedure on a number of other amino
benzaldehydes that were not commercially available (data
not shown) and have consistently obtained good yields of the
quinoline-3-carboxylates (>70% typically).
entry
1
solvent
dioxane 4 M HCl
(anhydrous)
dioxane 4 M HCl
(anhydrous)
acid
temp (°C) time (h) yield (%)
rt
21
30
2
100
21
32
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AcOH
TFA
THF
THF
THF
100
100
80
80
80
110
110
80
23
22
19
19
19
17
17
17
60
41
50
40
44
63
67
76
MeSO3H
CSA
PPTS
dioxane p-TsOH
toluene
THF
p-TsOH
p-TsOH
Two reagents that have been used extensively for the
reduction of the nitro group are Na2S2O4 and Fe/acid.10
First, we attempted to perform the one-pot procedure using
o-nitrobenzaldehyde, alkyl 3,3-dialkoxypropionate (methyl
or ethyl), and Na2S2O4 in refluxing acetic acid and obtained a
low yield of the desired product (21% and 20% respectively,
entries 1 and 2, Table 2). Additionally, we found that the
reaction under these conditions was capricious and irrepro-
ducible. The use of Na2S2O4 and TsOH in toluene did not
yield any of the desired product (entry 3). Similarly, the use
of iron and HCl or iron and p-TsOH in EtOH and toluene,
respectively, did not yield any product (entries 4 and 5). The
nitro group underwent reduction smoothly under these
reaction conditions but failed to cyclize.
SnCl2 can function as a chemoselective reducing agent11 as
well as a mild Lewis acid and was therefore an attractive
reagent for carrying out this reductive cyclization. Using
SnCl2 2H2O in refluxing EtOH we consistently obtained
3
good yields of the desired product (entry 6, 82% average over
2 runs). The reaction was further optimized by varying the
time and the number of equivalents of SnCl2 2H2O required
3
for the transformation. We found that 4 equiv of SnCl2
3
2H2O were necessary to give optimal yields of product.
Depending on the substrate, the reaction time generally
varied between 1.5 and 4 h. The reaction is operationally
very simple: all reagents are mixed in EtOH and refluxed
until the reaction is complete, prior to aqueous workup and
isolation by flash column chromatography.
Having established the optimal conditions for the reac-
tion, we then examined a variety of substituted o-nitrobenz-
aldehydes to explore the scope and limitations of the reaction
(Table 3).
Encouraged by the results, we wished to extend the utility
of the reaction and explore the possibility of affecting a one-
step reductive cyclization of o-nitrobenzaldehydes. Success
in this more complex transformation would allow access to a
much greater number of commercially available aromatic
aldehyde starting materials.
The reaction accommodates a range of functional groups,
including electron-withdrawing as well as electron-releasing
substituents on the nitrobenzaldehyde. Also, under these
reaction conditions, it is worth noting that bromides, chlori-
des, ester, and methoxy groups as well as the O-benzyl group
are tolerated (entries 2-5 and 7-10). Amine substitutions
(7) (a) Hsiao, Y.; Rivera, N. R.; Yasuda, N.; Hughes, D. L.; Reider, P. J.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1101–1103. (b) Yasuda, N.; Hsiao, Y.; Jensen, M. S.;
Rivera, N. R.; Yang, C.; Wells, K. M.; Yau, J.; Palucki, M.; Tan, L.; Dormer,
P. G.; Volante, R. P.; Hughes, D. L.; Reider, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
1959–1966. (c) McNaughton, B. R.; Miller, B. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4257–
4259. (d) Li, A.-H.; Ahmed, E.; Chen, X.; Cox, M.; Crew, A. P.; Dong, H.-Q.;
Jin, M.; Ma, L.; Panicker, B.; Siu, K. W.; Steinig, A. G.; Stolz, K. M.;
Tavares, P. A. R.; Volk, B.; Weng, Q.; Werner, D.; Mulvihill, M. J. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 61–64.
(8) Tom, N. J.; Whritenour, D. C. U.S. Pat. Appl. US2002042516A1,
2002.
(9) Haupt, A.; Unger, L.; Drescher, K.; Jongen-Relo, A. L.; Grandel, R.;
Braje, W.; Geneste, H. PCT Int. Appl. WO2006015842A1, 2006.
(10) (a) Boger, D. L.; Duff, S. R.; Panek, J. S.; Yasuda, M. J. Org. Chem.
€ €
1985, 50, 5782–5789. (b) Raitio, K. H.; Savinainen, J. R.; Vepsalainen, J.;
€
Laitinen, J. T.; Poso, A.; Jarvinen, T.; Nevalainen, T. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49,
2022–2027.
(11) Bellamy, F. D.; Ou, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 839–842.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 10, 2010 3489