Fig. 4 Potential equilibria for alkene exchange.
the selectivity of our alkene–imine coupling was a result of
thermodynamic, rather than kinetic, control.
Our studies aimed at addressing this question began with an
analysis of the basic reaction process—we accepted that: (1)
Ligand exchange at Ti was readily reversible and fast with
respect to C–C bond formation,7 and (2) azatitanacyclopentane
formation followed from syn-carbometalation across the
alkene. As depicted in Fig. 4, if C–C bond-formation is readily
reversible under the reaction conditions (4 " 5), then rapid
and reversible ligand exchange at Ti should allow for alkene
exchange (4 " 15). Subsequent carbometalation and proto-
nation would then deliver 1,5-amino alcohol 17 from the
preformed azametallacyclopentane 5.
To determine whether such an alkene exchange could occur
under the reaction conditions employed in our reductive cross-
coupling, we explored the general reaction scheme depicted in
Fig. 5A. Here, metallacyclopentane intermediates with similar
steric and electronic properties were sought to avoid biasing
any potential equilibria. With this goal in mind, homoallylic
alcohol 18 was coupled to imine 20 alongside the deuterated
analogs 19 and 21.8,9 After reductive coupling was judged
complete, the reaction mixtures were combined and stirred for
an additional six hours at 0 1C to allow for equilibration.
Subsequent hydrolysis of the presumed organometallic inter-
mediates (H2O) provided two of the four possible products
(Fig. 5B and C–I). Lack of evidence for D5 (M + H = 275.2)
or D2 (M + H = 272.2)-containing products is consistent
with the proposition that the equilibrium discussed in Fig. 4
does not play a role in product distribution.
Fig. 5 Cross-over experiments.
cross-coupling of simple homoallylic alcohols with aromatic
imines.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support of this work by
the National Institutes of Health-NIGMS (GM080266 and
GM080266-04S1).
Notes and references
1 For recent reviews, see: (a) H. A. Reichard, M. McLaughlin,
M. Z. Chen and G. C. Micalizio, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009, DOI:
10.1002/ejoc.200901094; (b) S.-S. Ng, C.-Y. Ho, K. D. Schleicher
and T. F. Jamison, Pure Appl. Chem., 2008, 80, 929;
(c) J. Montgomery and G. J. Sormunen, Top. Curr. Chem., 2007,
279, 1; (d) E. Skucas, M.-Y. Ngai, V. Komanduri and M. J. Krische,
Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40, 1394.
2 The majority of reductive methods for cross-coupling are limited to
a relatively small subset of coupling partners. See ref. 1 for reviews.
3 M. Takahashi and G. C. Micalizio, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
7514.
4 For the strain energy of cis- and trans-fused bicyclo-[3.3.0]-octane,
see: (a) S. Chang, R. H. Boyd, D. McNally, S. Sharyteh and
M. J. Hickey, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1970, 92, 3109. For an example
where a trans-fused bicyclo-[3.3.0] Zr-containing system is preferred,
see: (b) W. A. Nugent and D. F. Taber, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989,
111, 6435.
To confirm that the experimental procedure was sufficient for
the conclusion reached, we needed to validate that quenching of
the organometallic intermediates did not occur during the mixing
process. As such, a related experiment was performed where the
organometallic intermediates were quenched with D2O. In this
experiment, only D1 and D8-containing products were identified
(no evidence was found for the D6 or D3-containing cross-over
products; Fig. 5B and C–II).
In conclusion, we provide evidence that alkene exchange in
titanium alkoxide-mediated reductive cross-coupling of imines
with homoallylic alcohols does not occur under the reaction
conditions described. Because rapid and reversible ligand
exchange at Ti would allow for alkene exchange from mixed
titanate esters (i.e. 4 and 15), we conclude that carbometa-
lation under these reaction conditions occurs in an irreversible
manner. While more substituted alkenes may behave differently
in this coupling process, the current study describes conclusive
evidence in support of kinetic selectivity for the reductive
5 J. E. Hill, P. E. Fanwick and I. P. Rothwell, Organometallics, 1992,
11, 1775.
6 For related examples of C–C bond cleavage in metallacyclopentanes,
see: (a) J. X. McDermott, M. E. Wilson and G. M. Whitesides,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 6529; (b) R. H. Grubbs and
A. Miyashita, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 1300; (c) U. Dorf,
K. Engel and G. Erker, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1982, 21, 914;
(d) S. A. Cohen, P. R. Auburn and J. E. Bercaw, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1983, 105, 1136; (e) S. A. Cohen and J. E. Bercaw, Organometallics,
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3336–3338 | 3337