means that BN-substituted nucleobases are very attractive
as the next generation of BN-substituted heterocyclic com-
pounds. Although the synthesis and π electron distribution
property of 5-aza-6-borauracil (UBN) and its derivatives, in
which the C(6)dC(5) bond of uracil is replaced with a
B(6)-N(5) bond, appear in a paper9 and a patent,10 these
reports are dubious because of irreproducible scant experi-
mental detail and characterization only with an elemental
analysis, as Bielawski et al. pointed out.11 Bielawski et al.
have also reported the synthesis of B(6)-phenyl-BN-uracil
(PhUBN), which was characterized by mass and IR spectra
and an elemental analysis; they reported neither NMR data
nor X-ray crystallographic data, presumably because of its
high moisture sensitivity, insolubility in nonpolar solvents,
and/or instability in polar solvents. In this paper, we report
the synthesis, full characterization, and binding property of
isoelectronic analogues of nucleobases, B(6)-substituted
5-aza-6-borauracils (UBNs) and -thymines (TBNs) (Figure 1).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of UBNs and TBNs
was strongly suggested by a mass spectrum, probably due
to its low stability/solubility. In contrast, MesUBN (1b) and
TBNs (1c-e) could be purified by silica-gel chromatography
and/or gel permeation chromatography (GPC). ThxTBN was
not so stable as similar BN-substituted compounds reported
by Dewar et al.2c It gradually decomposed under ambient
atmosphere to give 1-methylbiuret.12 On the other hand,
B-mesitylated MesUBN (1b), MesTBN (1d), and m1MesTBN
(1e) were highly air- and moisture-stable, and no decomposi-
tion was observed for up to two months; the high stabilities
made the full chracterization of the analogues possible (see
Supporting Information). In an aqueous methanol solution
under reflux, however, MesTBN was gradually hydrolyzed
to afford mesitylboric acid and 1-methylbiuret.13
The replacement of the C(6)dC(5) bond of uracil with a
B(6)-N(5) bond results in the same chemical environment
for the N(1) and N(5) amide protons in MesUBN; the amide
Figure 1. Design of BN-substituted uracils and thymines.
1
protons were observed to be equivalent in the H NMR of
MesUBN. Moreover, the chemical shift of the amide protons
was dependent on the concentration, implying that the proton
at the N(5)-position was also associated in the intermolecular
hydrogen-bonding interaction. Thus, MesUBN was distinc-
tively different from original uracil in molecular symmetry
and hydrogen-bonding ability.
To prevent the hydrolysis of UBNs and TBNs and to increase
their solubilities in common nonpolar solvents, we considered
that a proper substituent should be introduced on the boron
atom. Then, we selected thexyl and mesityl groups as typical
aliphatic and aromatic substituents, respectively, with the
expectation that their obvious bulkiness would obstruct the
nucleophilic attack of polar molecules to the boron atom in
the UBNs and TBNs and that their hydrophobicity would make
the UBNs and TBNs solubile in nonpolar solvents.
The B(6)-substituted UBNs and TBNs (1a-e) thus designed
were synthesized by the one-step cyclization reaction of
biurets (2a-c) with monosubstituted boranes (3a,b) in THF
(Scheme 1). Among the targeted five analogues, ThxUBN
could not be unfortunately isolated, although its formation
The crystalline-state structures of MesUBN and MesTBN
were determined by X-ray crystallography (Figure 2).14 In
both of the crystals, there are two different molecular forms
in each unit cell, depending on the hydrogen-bonding
patterns. In the crystal of MesUBN, one of the amide protons
interacts with the mesityl group of the neighbored molecule
by NH-π interaction,15 and the other constructs a hydrogen-
(12) ThxTBN was almost completely decomposed in a few days under
ambient atmosphere.
(13) 35% of MesTBN was decomposed, when it was heated in CD3OD
for 20 h at 60 °C (bath temperature). See Figure S5 (Supporting Information)
for details.
(14) CCDC 747972 (MesUBN) and CCDC747974 (MesTBN).
(15) (a) Kim, K. S.; Tarakeshwar, P.; Lee, J. Y. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100,
4145. (b) Tsuzuki, S.; Honda, K.; Uchimaru, T.; Mikami, M.; Tanabe, K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11450. (c) Mons, M.; Dimicoli, I.; Tardivel,
B.; Piuzzi, F.; Brenner, V.; Millie´, P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 571.
(8) (a) Pranata, J.; Wierschke, S. G.; Jorgensen, W. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 2810. (b) Murray, T. J.; Zimmerman, S. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 4010. (c) Beijer, F. H.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Vekemans,
J. A. J. M.; Meijer, E. W.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L. J. Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 6371.
(9) Maitra, A. Indian J. Chem. 1978, 16B, 85.
(10) Boone, J. L. U. S. Patent 3,060,234, 1962; C. A. 1963, 5704.
(11) Bielawski, J.; Niedenzu, K.; Weber, A.; Weber, W. Z. Naturforsch.
1981, 86b, 470.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 15, 2010
3387