G.G. Mohamed, M.H. Soliman / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 76 (2010) 341–347
347
Table 5
The antibacterial and antifungal activity of sulpiride drug and its metal complexes.
Sample
Inhibition zone diameter (mm/mg sample)
Escherichia coli (G−
)
Staphylococcus aureus (G+)
Aspergillus flavus (fungus)
Candida albicans (fungus)
SPR; L
17
12
17
23
20
19
19
32
0.0
13
11
13
24
22
15
17
34
0.0
8
10
7
15
18
10
9
7
10
11
18
21
13
12
[MnCl2(L)2(H2O)2]·2H2O
[FeCl2(L)2(H2O)2]Cl·H2O
[CoCl2(L)2(H2O)2]·H2O
[NiCl2(L)2(H2O)2]·H2O
[CuCl2(L)2(H2O)2]·H2O
[ZnCl2(L)2(H2O)2]
Tetracycline (antibacterial agent)
Amphotricine B (antifungal agent)
0.0
17
0.0
21
+, inhibition values up to 10 mm beyond control; ++, inhibition values, 11–15 mm beyond control; +++, inhibition values, 16–22 mm beyond control; ++++, inhibition values
more than 23 mm beyond control.
SPR drug and lower than tetracycline standard. In addi-
tion, the biological activity of Mn(II) complex is lower
than that of the free SPR ligand. For Fe(III) complex, its
biological activity is the same like that of SRL. The biolog-
ical activity of the complexes, therefore, follow the order
tetracycline > Co(II) > Ni(II) > Zn(II) = Cu(II) > L = Fe(III) > Mn(II).
(b) Using Aspergillus flavus fungus: The antifungal activity of
Ni(II) complex is found to be higher than that of the free
semisynthetic compounds e.g. Hickman [32]. Such compounds may
have a possible antitumour effect since Gram-negative bacteria are
considered a quantitative microbiological method testing benefi-
cial and important drugs in both clinical and experimental tumour
chemotherapy [33].
References
[1] British Pharmacopoeia, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, 2000.
[2] K. Parfitt (Ed.), “Martindale”, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 692, 32th ed., Pharma-
ceutical Press, London, 1999, p. 1199.
SPR ligand and amphotricine
B standard. The antifungal
activity is found to follow the order Ni(II) > amphotricine
B > Co(II) > Mn(II) = Cu(II) > Zn(II) > SPR > Fe(III).
[3] X. Yu, Z. Luo, J.S. Tang, P. Yu, Sepu. 15 (1997) 546.
[4] W. Han, L. Jiang, L. Gao, G. Zhou, W. Jia, Zhongguo Yaoxue Zazhi 24 (1989) 605.
[5] C. Dross, R. Sonntag, J. Mannhold, J. Chromatogr. 639 (1993) 287.
[6] N.J. Fang, W.H. Long, X.A. Lin, Z.S. Hua, B.Y. Chao, L.S. Fang, Y.R. Qin, J. Anal. Sci.
23 (2007) 137.
(c) Using Candida albicans fungus: The biological activ-
ity of Ni(II) complex is found to be equal to that of
the free SPR ligand and amphotricine standard. The
biological activity is found to follow the order Ni(II) =
amphotricine > Co(II) > Cu(II) > Zn(II) > Fe(III) > Mn(II) > SPR.
[7] I.S.I.M. Zayed, J. Anal. Sci 21 (2005) 985.
[8] A.F.M. Elwalily, A. Elgindy, M.F. Beair, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 21 (1999) 535.
[9] I.F.A. Aly, N.A. Alarfaj, A.A. Alwarthan, Talanta 54 (2001) 715.
[10] Q. Li, J.K. Zubieta, R.T. Kennedy, J. Anal. Chem. 81 (6) (2009) 2242–2250.
[11] P. Yang, M. Yingwei, A. Lee, Electrophoresis 30 (3) (2009) 457–464.
[12] E.E. Jameson, J. Pei, S.M. Wade, J. Anal. Chem. 79 (3) (2007) 1158–1163.
[13] Z.D. Sandlin, M.S. Shou, J.G. Shackman, R.T. Kennedy, J. Anal. Chem. 77 (23)
(2005) 7702–7708.
[14] X. Xu, J.T. Stewart, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 23 (2000) 735.
[15] P.L. Yang, R.J. Whelan, Y.W. Mao, J. Anal. Chem. 79 (4) (2007) 1690–1695.
[16] J. Li, F. Zhao, H. Ju, J. Chromatogr. B 835 (2006) 84–89.
[17] Y.H. Zeng, H.Y. Ma, Fenxi Huaxue 25 (1997) 56.
[18] O.A. Farghaly, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 23 (2000) 783.
[19] R.J. Grayer, J.B. Harbone, Phytochemistry 37 (1994) 19–42.
[20] O.N. Irob, M.M. Yang, W.A. Apderson, Int. J. Pharmacol. 34 (1996) 87–90.
[21] F. Salama, N. El-Abasawy, S.A. Abdel Razeq, M.M.F. Ismail, M.M. Fouad, J. Pharm.
Biomed. Anal. 33 (2003) 411.
Also, it is found that E. Coli is inhibited by Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and
Zn(II) complexes. The importance of this lies in the fact that these
complexes could be applied fairly in the treatment of some common
diseases caused by E. coli e.g. Septicaemia, Gastroenteritis, Urinary
tract infections and hospital acquired infections [28]. However, the
complexes were specialized in inhibiting Gram-positive and Gram-
negative bacterial strains (Table 5). The importance of this unique
property of the investigated Schiff base complexes lies in the fact
that, it could be applied safely in the treatment of infections caused
by any of these particular strains.
[22] M.H. Soliman, G.G. Mohamed, E.A. Mohamed, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 99 (2010)
639.
[23] M.M. Omar, G.G. Mohamed, A.A. Ibrahim, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 73 (2009)
358.
4. Conclusion
[24] F.A. Cotton, G. Wilkinson, C.A. Murillo, M. Bochmann, Advanced Inorganic
Chemistry, Sixth ed., Wiley, New York, 1999.
[25] M.A. Zayed, F.A. Nour El-Dien, G.G. Mohamed, N.E.A. El-Gamel, J. Mol. Struct.
841 (2007) 41.
[26] G.G. Mohamed, F.A. Nour EL-Dien, S.M. Khalil, A.S. Mohammad, J. Coord. Chem.
[27] A.W. Coats, J.P. Redfern, Nature 20 (1964) 68.
[28] E. Jawetz, J.I. Melnick, E.A. Adelberg, Review of Medical Microbiology, 16th ed.,
LangMedical Publications, Los Anglos, CA, 1979.
[29] H. Nikaido, T. Nakae, Adv. Microbiol. Physiol. 20 (1979) 163.
[30] N.R.W. Brown, Resistance of Peseudomonas aeruginosa, 71, John Wiley, 1975.
[31] E.M. Hodnett, A.W. Wu, F.A. French, Eur. J. Med. Chem./Chem. Ther. 13 (1987)
577.
[32] J.A. Hickman, Biochemie 60 (1987) 997.
[33] T. Inoue, Y. Yamashita, M. Nishihara, S. Sugiyama, Y. Sonoda, T. Kumabe, M.
Yokoyama, T. Tominaga, Neuro-oncology 11 (2009) 151.
Since almost all scientists working in the field of search for
new antitumours depend basically on the line of antibiotics affect-
ing Gram-negative bacteria [29–31], and since there are certain
organisms which have proved difficult to treat and most of them
are Gram-negative rods. It is therefore believed that all the com-
plexes which are biologically active against both the Gram-negative
strains may have something to do with the barrier function of the
envelope of these Gram-negative activity, acting in a way simi-
lar to that described by Brown [30] and Nikaido and Nakae [29].
Therefore, it is claimed here that the synthesis of these complexes
might be recommended and/or established a new line for search
to new antitumour particularly when one knows that many work-
ers studied the possible antitumour action of many synthetic and