A. Temperini et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 4121–4124
4123
Table 2
Bn
PhthN
R
O
THF/ RT
Et3N
Multistep preparation of enantiomerically enriched N-protected b3-aminoacids
from N-protected propargylic amines 4
7
+
SePh
ClH3N CO2Me
N-Protected
propargylic
amines 4
N-Protected b3-amino acids 7
Yielda (%)
erb
6d
PhthN
R
O
Bn
CO2Me
+
PhSeSePh
N
PhthN
CO2H
H
10
4a
63
65
87:13
83:17
53% (d.r. = 88:12)
R = CbzNH-(CH2)4-
ent-4a
ent-7a
PhthN
Scheme 3. Formation of mixed
calculated from 4d. The diastereoisomeric mixed
67% global yield from ent-6d by the same procedure.
a
/b-dipeptide 10 from intermediate 6d. Global yield
CO2H
4b
76
77:23
a
/b-dipeptide 11 was obtained in
Ph
7b
PhthN
c
4d
50
56
—
CbzNH
CO2H
The whole transformations of 1 into 4 and of 4 into 7 may not re-
quire purification of the intermediate products but a work-up and
isolation procedure of crude materials: there are solvent changes
from EtOAc to THF to MeOH to CH2Cl2 to THF on the way from 1
to 4 and from DMF to CH2Cl2 to THF on the way from 4 to 7. It is
worth noting that the entire synthetic procedure is of general
application since different functionalities present in the substrates
such as phenyl, hydroxy, phthaloyl and benzyloxycarbonyl groups
are tolerated under the reaction conditions employed. Modifica-
tions of the above strategy to minimize the loss of enantiomeric
4
c
ent-4d
ent-7d
—
a
b
c
Total yield calculated from 4.
Determined by chiral HPLC on the corresponding methyl ester derivatives.
Enantiomeric ratio was determined by proton magnetic resonance analysis of
b-dipeptide.
the corresponding mixed
a
purity of the starting a-amino acids are currently under investiga-
tion in our laboratory.
PhthN
NPhth
4c
i
HO
HO
O
O
8
ii
Acknowledgements
51% (e.r. = 98:2)
Financial support from MIUR, National Projects PRIN 2007, Con-
sorzio CINMPIS, Bari and University of Perugia is gratefully
acknowledged.
PhthN
NPhth
i
O
O
ii
Supplementary data
ent-4c
ent-
8
53% (e.r. = 77:23)
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
Scheme 2. Formation of lactone 8 from 4c and lactone ent-8 from ent-4c. Reagents
and conditions: (i) PhSeBr (1.1 equiv), CuI (2 equiv), DMF, rt, 48 h; (ii) p-TsOH
(2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 70 °C, 4 h.
References and notes
1. (a) Liu, M.; Sibi, M. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7991–8035; (b)Enantioselective
Synthesis of b-Amino Acids; Juaristi, E., Soloshonok, V. A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: New
York, 2005; (c) Seebach, D.; Overhand, M.; Kuhnle, F. N. M.; Martinoni, B.;
Oberer, L.; Hommel, U.; Widmer, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1996, 79, 913–941; (d)
Appella, D. H.; Christianson, L. A.; Karle, I. L.; Powell, D. R.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 13071–13072.
b3-amino acid methyl esters 9a, ent-9a and 9b. The enantiomeric
ratios of these esters (HPLC analysis) were identical with those of
the corresponding propargylic amine precursors (Table 1) indicat-
ing that no racemization occurred during the multistep conversion
of 4 into 6. The enantiomeric purity of the acids 7d and ent-7d was
measured on the corresponding amides because the corresponding
methyl esters could not be separated by HPLC. Thus Se-phenyl sele-
nocarboxylate 6d and ent-6d were reacted with enantiomerically
2. Ma, J. S. Chemistry Today 2003, 4, 65–68.
3. (a) Seebach, D.; Schreiber, J. V.; Abele, S.; Daura, X.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Helv.
Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 34–57; (b) Cheng, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F.
Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3219–3232; (c) Steer, D. L.; Lew, A.; Perlmutter, P.; Smith,
A. I.; Aguilar, M. I. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9, 811–822; (d) Seebach, D.; Beck, A.
K.; Bierbaum, D. J. Chem. Biodivers. 2004, 1, 1111–1239; (e) Cardillo, G.;
Gentilucci, L.; Tolomelli, A. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 293–304.
4. (a) Balenovic, K.; Bregant, N.; Cerar, D.; Tkalcic, M. J. Org. Chem. 1951, 16, 1308–
1310; (b) Penke, B.; Czombos, J.; Balaspiri, L.; Petres, J.; Kocas, K. Helv. Chim.
Acta 1970, 53, 1057–1061; (c) Gmeimer, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 5717–
5720; (d) Seki, M.; Matsumoto, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3165–3168; (e)
Caputo, R.; Cassano, E.; Longobardo, L.; Palumbo, G. Tetrahedron 1995, 51,
12337–12350; (f) Dexter, C. S.; Jackson, R. F. W. Chem. Commun. 1998, 75–76;
(g) Farras, J.; Ginesta, X.; Sutton, P. W.; Taltavull, J.; Egeler, F.; Romea, P.; Urpi,
F.; Vilarrasa, J. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 7665–7674; (h) Gray, D.; Concellon, C.;
Gallagher, T. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4849–4850; (i) Saavedra, C. J.; Hernandez,
R.; Boto, A.; Alvarez, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 8757–8760; (l) Katritzky, A.
R.; Tao, H.; Jiang, R.; Suzuki, K.; Kirichenko, K. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 407–414;
(m) Byrne, C. M.; Church, T. L.; Kramer, J. W.; Coates, G. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 3979–3983.
pure
ran and in the presence of triethylamine.
The corresponding mixed b-dipeptides 10 and 11 (Scheme 3)
L-phenylalanine methyl ester hydrochloride in tetrahydrofu-
a
were obtained in 53% and 67% good global yields from 6d and
ent-6d, respectively. Due to the nature of the transformations in-
volved, no racemization occurred during the conversion of 3d into
4d and of 5d into 6d as demonstrated above. Thus, the diastereo-
isomeric ratios of dipeptides 10 and 11, determined by proton
NMR, represented the enantiomeric composition of 6d and ent-
6d as well as those of the N-Boc propargylic amine 3d and ent-
3d, respectively. Finally, the N-phthaloyl b3-amino acids 7 can be
deprotected16 by reaction with hydrazine hydrate to give the cor-
responding b3-amino acid hydrochlorides.
5. Tiecco, M.; Testaferri, L.; Temperini, A.; Bagnoli, L.; Marini, F.; Santi, C.; Terlizzi,
R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 3447–3458.
6. Zani, L.; Bolm, C. Chem. Commun. 2006, 4263–4275.
7. Reginato, G.; Mordini, A.; Messina, F.; Degl’Innocenti, A.; Poli, G. Tetrahedron
1996, 52, 10985–10996.
In conclusion, the present methodology represents a new proce-
dure for the homologation of natural and unnatural a-amino acids.