K. Serdons et al.
washes with PBS at room temperature. Filters containing the was done using radio-LC-MS and by comparison of retention
bound iodine-125 ligand were counted in a gamma counter times on RP-HPLC. The partition coefficient of the two
(Packard 5000, Ramsey, Minnesota, USA) with 70% counting compounds is compatible with a free passive diffusion over the
efficiency. Under the assay conditions, the specifically bound BBB. In control mice both compounds have a relatively high
fraction was less than 15% of the total radioactivity. Protein initial brain uptake, which is significantly higher for [18F]2 (2 min
determinations were performed with Lowry’s method using p.i.: [18F]2: 4.5% ID/g and [18F]3: 3.0% ID/g, po0.05), whereas
bovine serum albumin as a standard.33 The results of saturation wash-out from control brain is faster for [18F]3. In vitro binding
and inhibition experiments were subjected to non-linear affinity tests using post mortem human AD brain homogenates
regression analysis using EBDA by which Kd and Ki values were revealed that only compound 2 has affinity for fibrillar amyloid b.
calculated.
This was confirmed by incubation of APP mouse brain sections
with the cold compounds, where 3 did not stain any structure
In vitro affinity for amyloid present in mouse brain sections while 2 stained amyloid plaques present in APP mouse brain.
These data suggest that [18F]2 may be a useful tracer for in vivo
Transgenic mice overexpressing human AbPP (London mutation,
visualization of fibrillar amyloid b.
412 months old) were anaesthetized with pentobarbital and the
brain was flushed transcardially with icecold saline. The brain was
removed and post-fixed overnight with 4% paraformaldehyde in
PBS. One part of the brain was stored in 0.1% sodium azide in PBS
at 41C. The other part was processed for paraffin embedding. 6 mm
sagittal sections were cut using a Microm HM 340 E microtome
REFERENCES
[1] L. Cai, R. B. Innis, V. W. Pike, Curr Med Chem 2007, 4,
19–52.
[2] W. E. Klunk, M. L. Debnath, J. W. Pettegrew, Neurobiol Aging 1994,
15, 691–698.
(Microm, Walldorf, Germany). Prior to incubation, paraffin sections
were taken through two 5min washes with xylol, followed by 1min
sequential washes with 100, 100, 90, 70, 50% ethanol and PBS
before they were blow-dried. After rehydration, the sections were
incubated for 1 h with one of the cold compounds (2 or 3) in a
concentration range between 10 mM and 10 nM. After 1 h, the brain
sections were rinsed with tap water and coverslipped with a
Mowiol-DABCO solution (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany). For
immunohistochemical staining, the same deparaffinization protocol
was used. The sections were pretreated with 96% formic acid for
7 min to enhance signal. After rinsing with PBS, the sections were
treated with 1.5% H2O2 in PBS/methanol 50:50 v/v to inhibit
endogenous peroxidase. Non-specific binding was blocked by
treatment with PBS containing 0.05% tweens 20 (PBST) and 10%
fetal calf serum (FCS, Gentaur, Brussels, Belgium). The sections were
incubated overnight with pan b-amyloid (AB-1) polyclonal anti-
bodies (Oncogene Research Products, San Diego, CA, USA) diluted
1/1000 in PBST 10% FCS at 41C. After rinsing in PBST, the sections
were incubated for 1 h with 1/500 diluted goat anti-rabbit biotin
(Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) in PBST 10% FCS. Then,
sections were incubated with avidin biotin complex (Vectastain Elite
ABC-peroxidase kit, Vector Laboratories) dissolved in PBST 10% FCS
for 30 min at room temperature. Peroxidase activity was developed
with 3,30-diaminobenzidine, after which the sections were counter-
stained with hematoxylin. In case no immunohistochemical staining
was done, the presence of plaques in the transgenic mice was
confirmed by incubation of neighbouring sections with X-34.
Fluorescence microscopy was performed using a Leica DMR
microscope equipped with a digital Leica DC480 camera (Leica
Microsystems, Groot Bijgaarden, Belgium) and a UV filter set with
following specifications: excitation: 340–380 nm bandpass filter,
dichromatic mirror 400 nm; emission: 425 nm longpass filter. The
images were acquired and processed with Leica IM500 image
processing software.
[3] S. D. Styren, R. L. Hamilton, G. C. Styren, W. E. Klunk, J Histochem
Cytochem 2000, 48, 1223–1232.
[4] D. M. Skovronsky, B. Zhang, M. P. Kung, H. F. Kung, J. Q. Trojanowski,
VM-Y. Lee, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97, 7609–7614.
[5] M. L. Schmidt, T. Schuck, S. Sheridan, M. P. Kung, H. Kung,
Z. P. Zhuang, Am J Pathol 2001, 159, 937–943.
¨
[6] C-W. Lee, Z-P. Zhuang, M-P. Kung, K. Plossl, D. Skovronsky,
T. L. Gur, J Med Chem 2001, 44, 2270–2275.
[7] Z-P. Zhuan, M-P. Kung, C. Hou, D. Skovronsky, T. L. Gur, K. Plossl,
¨
J Med Chem 2001, 44, 1905–1914.
[8] M. Ono, A. Wilson, J. Nobrega, D. Westaway, P. Verhoeff,
Z-P. Zhuang, Nucl Med Biol 2003, 30, 565–571.
¨
[9] H. Kung, C. Lee, Z. Zhuang, M. Kung, C. Houc, K. Plossl, J Am Chem
Soc 2001, 123, 12740–12741.
[10] E. D. Agdeppa, V. Kepe, J. Liu, S. Flores-Torres, N. Satyamurthy,
A. Petric, J Neurosci 2001, 21, RC189.
[11] K. Shoghi-Jadid, G. W. Small, E. D. Agdeppa, V. Kepe, L. M. Ercoli,
P. Siddarth, Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002, 10, 24–35.
[12] C-W. Lee, M-P. Kung, C. Hou, H. F. Kung, Nucl Med Biol 2003, 30,
573–580.
[13] N. Okamura, T. Suemoto, H. Shimadzu, M. Suzuki, T. Shiomitsu,
H. Akatsu, J Neurosci 2004, 24, 2535–2541.
[14] T. Suemoto, N. Okamura, T. Shiomitsu, M. Suzuki, H. Shimadzu,
H. Akatsu, Neurosci Res 2004, 48, 65–74.
[15] C. C. Rowe, U. Ackerman, W. Browne, R. Mulligan, K. L. Pike,
G. O’Keefe, H. Tochon-Danguy, G. Chan, S. U. Berlangieri, G. Jones,
K. L. Dickinson-Rowe, H. P. Kung, W. Zhang, M. P. Kung,
D. Skovronsky, F. Dyrks, G. Holl, S. Krause, M. Friebe, L. Lehman,
S. Lindeman, L. M. Dinkelborg, C. L. Masters, V. L. Villemagne,
Lancet Neurol 2008, 7, 129–135.
[16] W. E. Klunk, Y. Wang, G-F. Huang, M. L. Debnath, D. P. Holt,
C. A. Mathis, Life Sci 2001, 69, 1471–1484.
[17] Y. Wang, W. E. Klunk, G-F. Huang, M. L. Debnatg, D. P. Holt,
C. A. Mathis, J Mol Neurosci 2002, 19, 11–16.
[18] C. A. Mathis, B. J. Bacskai, S. T. Kajdasz, M. E. McLellan, M. P. Frosch,
B. T. Hyman, Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2002, 12, 295–298.
[19] C. A. Mathis, Y. Wang, D. P. Holt, G-F. Huang, M. L. Debnath,
W. E. Klunk, J Med Chem 2003, 46, 2740–2754.
¨
[20] Z-P. Zhuang, M-P. Kung, C. Hou, K. Plossl, D. Skovronsky, T. L. Gur,
Nucl Med Biol 2001, 28, 887–894.
[21] M. Ono, M-P. Kung, C. Hou, H. F. Kung, Nucl Med Biol 2002, 29,
633–642.
Conclusion
[22] M-P. Kung, C. Hou, Z-P. Zhuang, B. Zhang, D. Skovronsky,
J. Q. Trojanowski, Brain Res 2002, 956, 202–210.
[23] M-P. Kung, C. Hou, Z-P. Zhuang, A. J. Cross, D. L. Maier, H. F. Kung,
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004, 31, 1136–1145.
[24] C. Mathis, B. Lopresti, N. Mason, J. Price, N. Flatt, W. Bi, S. Ziolko,
S. DeKosky, W. J. Klunk, J Nucl Med 2007, 48, 56P.
Two 2-(4’-aminophenyl)-1,3-benzothiazoles were derivatized
either at the 6-position or at the 2’-position with a tosyloxypro-
poxy moiety and then labelled with 18F in a 50% yield, resulting
in an average specific activity of about 42GBq/mmol EOS. Identity
confirmation of the 18F-labelled phenylbenzothiazole derivatives
Copyright r 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Label Compd. Radiopharm 2009, 52 473–481