thereby precludes the use of many functionalities. Further-
more, this route often leads to the formation of undesired
byproduct such as the N-hydroxide 8 (Scheme 1).7 Hence,
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Substituted Bromo Anilides as
Precursors to Quinoxalinone Scaffolds
Scheme 1. Conventional Synthetic Approach to Quinoxalinone 7
conditions, namely, the effects of altering catalyst, ligand, base,
solvent, temperature, and reaction time on the percentage of
conversion (Table 1). The two parameters we found to have
the most significant impact on the cyclization were choice of
solvent and base. The stronger bases such as t-BuOK, NaH,
and LiHMDS were clearly superior to weaker bases such as
Cs2CO3, DBU, and triethylamine (entries 1-8), and t-BuOK
was found to be most efficient. Subsequent studies therefore
utilized t-BuOK, and we varied only one parameter at a time.
In terms of solvents, dioxane was found to be the best followed
by DMA, DMF, and toluene (entries 10 vs 11 and 9 vs 12 and
13). Pd(OAc)2 and Pd2(dba)3 were both effective catalysts for
the cyclization, with Pd2(dba)3 affording slightly better conver-
sions (entries 1, 2 vs 9, 10, respectively). Among 12 different
ligands screened for cyclization (Figure 2), imidazoline carbene
there is a need for new methodology that would allow access
to a range of custom-designed quinoxalinones.
The transition-metal-catalyzed N-arylation reaction (Buch-
wald-Hartwig amination) has gained a lot of attention in
recent years. The popularity of this approach may be attributed
to mild conditions that are generally required to make N-aryl
bonds, as well as compatibility to diverse functional groups.8
Moreover, intramolecular N-arylation has been shown to be an
attractive method to form polyheterocycles.9
Herein, we report a practical and highly efficient route to
quinoxalinone scaffolds via palladium-catalyzed intramo-
lecular N-arylation (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
.
Synthesis of Quinoxalinones via Palladium-Catalyzed
Intramolecular N-Arylation
The precursors to the quinoxalinone core were easily
prepared from D,L-proline via the mixed anhydride protocol
(Scheme 3) followed by Boc group deprotection. The
resulting amine hydrochloride salts were obtained with
sufficient purity (>95%) and were used for cyclization
without further purification.
We then evaluated the intramolecular N-arylation reaction
of a proline amide derivative (9) by using microwave irradiation.
To start, we systematically evaluated a broad range of reaction
Figure 2. Ligand screening in Pd-catalyzed cyclization of compound 9.
type ligands were found to be most effective. Ligand H, 1,3-
bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-4,5-dihydroimidazolium tetrafluo-
roborate, led to the highest conversion (>95%) (Figure 3). The
effects of varying catalyst or ligand loading on cyclization were
found to be relatively small (Table 1, entries 14-20). Using 1
mol % of Pd2(dba)3 and 2 mol % of ligand H gave a quantitative
conversion in just 10 min at 160 °C (entry 20). Overall, lower
temperatures were found to be detrimental, but this could be
compensated by prolonging the heating time in the microwave
reactor, and the percentage of conversion could be improved
up to 92% (entries 21-24). Control experiments showed that
omitting the ligand afforded only 30% conversion, while no
product was detected when both the catalyst and a ligand were
left out (entries 25 and 26).
(7) Abou-Gharbia, M.; Freed, M. E.; McCaully, R. J.; Silver, P. J.;
Wendt, R. L. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 27, 1743–1746.
(8) For recent reviews, see: (a) Janey, J. M. In Name Reactions for
Functional Group Transformations; Li, J. J., Corey, E. J., Eds.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007; pp 564-609. (b) Appukkuttan, P.; Van
der Eycken, E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 1133–1155.
(9) (a) Kirsch, G.; Hesse, S.; Comel, A. Curr. Org. Synth. 2004, 1, 47–63.
(b) Ferraccioli, R.; Carenzi, D. Synthesis 2003, 1383–1386. (c) Zeni, G.; Larock,
R. C. Chem. ReV. 2006, 106, 4644–4680. (d) Mori, M.; Ishikura, M.; Ikeda,
T.; Ban, Y. Heterocycles 1981, 16, 1491–1494. (e) Nishimura, Y.; Minamida,
A.; Matsumoto, J.-i. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1988, 25, 479–485. (f) Bower, J. F.;
Szeto, P.; Gallagher, T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3283–3286.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 16, 2010
3575