limited to electron-rich aromatic carboxylic acids. Goossen
and Larrosa have independently disclosed that Ag salts were
effective catalysts for protodecarboxylation of a wide range
of benzoic acids,4 pointing out the possibility that a silver
salt is responsible for the decarboxylative process in the Pd/
Ag-promoted decarboxylative Heck reaction. In our inves-
tigation on decarboxylative coupling of benzoic acids with
indoles, we observed that Pd-catalyzed decarboxylation
occurred for electron-rich aromatic carboxylic acids including
heteroaromatic ones, whereas decarboxylation of electron-
deficient aromatic carboxylic acids resulted from the con-
tribution of the silver salt.2j Herein, we demonstrate that the
Pd catalyst itself can effect decarboxylative Heck coupling
of both electron-rich and electron-deficient aromatic car-
boxylic acids without the need for any Ag salt when
dioxygen is used as the terminal oxidant and show that due
to the difference in reactivity between electron-rich aromatic
carboxylic acids and electron-deficient ones different Pd
catalysts are required for decarboxylative Heck coupling to
occur: Pd(OAc)2 efficiently works for electron-rich aromatic
carboxylic acids, while the Pd(OAc)2/SIPr system (SIPr )
1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-4,5-dihydroimidazol-2-
ylidene) enables the use of electron-deficient aromatic
carboxylic acids as coupling partners.
°C in the presence of 10 mol % of Pd(TFA)2 (TFA )
trifluoroacetate) under 1 atm of dioxygen provided the
desired product 3aa in 85% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Using
Table 1. Decarboxylative Heck Coupling of
2,4-Dimethoxybenzoic Acid 1a with Methyl Acrylate 2a under
Different Conditionsa
,
entry
Pd (mol %)
oxidant (1 atm) isolated yield (%)b c
1
2
Pd(TFA)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (5)
Pd(OAc)2 (5)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
O2
O2
O2
O2
air
air
85
90
73
89
34
36
3
4d
5
6e
a Conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), 5% DMSO-DMF (2 mL),
120 °C, 10 h. b Average of two runs. c The E/Z ratio of product is >20:1,
as determined by H NMR. d The reaction was carried out under 1.8 atm
1
of O2. e The reaction was carried out under 1.8 atm of air.
For economical and environmental reasons, there is an
increasing demand for the use of dioxygen as an oxidant for
metal-catalyzed selective oxidation reactions. In this field,
remarkable progress has been made,6 including oxidation of
alcohols to carbonyl compounds,7 oxygenation of olefins,8
and oxidative cross-coupling reactions.9 To the best of our
knowledge, however, the catalytic decarboxylative coupling
of aromatic carboxylic acids with dioxygen as an oxidant
has not been reported previously. Since Pd-catalyzed aerobic
oxidative reactions generally involve direct aerobic oxidation
of Pd(0) species that compete with aggregation of the catalyst
into inactive palladium black, the rapid oxidation of the Pd(0)
intermediate is a key to achieving efficient conversion for
these reactions.9c In this report, we observed that in many
cases a slight increase in dioxygen pressure significantly
improved the yields due to acceleration of oxidation of the
Pd(0) intermediate.
Pd(OAc)2 in place of Pd(TFA)2 furnished 90% isolated yield
under otherwise identical conditions (entry 2). An amount
of 5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 furnished a decreased yield under
1 atm of dioxygen (entry 3); however, a slight increase in
dioxygen pressure (1.8 atm) allowed reducing palladium
loading to 5 mol % without compromising the yield (entry
4). However, the reaction gave poor yields under both 1 and
1.8 atm of air (Table 1, entries 5 and 6).
We next evaluated the substrate scope of this protocol with
respect to aromatic carboxylic acids. As shown in Table 2, this
protocol was applicable to the coupling of a broad array of
aromatic carboxylic acids with methyl acrylate 2a. An amount
of 5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 with 1.8 atm of O2 furnished good to
excellent yields with many electron-rich aromatic carboxylic
acids. Compared with 2,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid, 2-methoxy-
4-methylbenzoic acid is less electron-rich and thereby less
reactive, providing the corresponding product in 75% yield with
10 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 under 1 atm of dioxygen and 34% yield
with 5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 under 1.8 atm of dioxygen (Table
2, entry 3). Compared with its isomer 2,4,5-trimethoxybenzoic
acid, 2,4,6-trimethoxybenzoic acid was a less effective substrate
to afford 70% yield in the presence of 10 mol % of Pd(OAc)2
under 1 atm of dioxygen, which reflected the effect of
substitution pattern on the reactivity of benzoic acids toward
decarboxylative coupling (Table 2, entries 4 and 5). In the
reaction of benzoic acid bearing an amino group, 2 mol % of
Pd(OAc)2 gave rise to a yield comparable to that obtained with
5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 under 1.8 atm of dioxygen, presumably
because coordination of the amino-containing substrate to the
Pd center stabilized the Pd catalyst (Table 2, entry 6). An
elevated dioxygen pressure (3.2 atm) was required to deliver
an excellent yield for benzoic acid bearing a bromo substituent,
which could be explained by rapid aerobic oxidation of a Pd(0)
intermediate under a higher dioxygen pressure that should
We initiated our investigation by examining the decar-
boxylative coupling of 2,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid 1a with
2 equiv of methyl acrylate 2a. Gratifyingly, the reaction
conducted in 5% DMSO/DMF (v/v) mixed solvents at 120
(6) (a) Stahl, S. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3400. (b)
Punniyamurthy, T.; Velusamy, S.; Iqbal, J. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 2329.
(c) Piera, J.; Ba¨ckvall, J.-E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3506.
(7) Ebner, D. C.; Trend, R. M.; Genet, C.; McGrath, M. J.; O’Brien, P.;
Stoltz, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6367.
(8) Wang, A.; Jiang, H.; Chen, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3846.
(9) (a) Dams, M.; De Vos, D. E.; Celen, S.; Jacobs, P. A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3512. (b) Andappan, M. M. S.; Nilsson, P.; von Schenck,
H.; Larhed, M. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5212. (c) Rogers, M. M.; Kotov,
V.; Chatwichien, J.; Stahl, S. S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4331. (d) Li, B.-J.;
Tian, S.-L.; Fang, Z.; Shi, Z.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1115. (e)
Liu, G.; Yin, G.; Wu, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4733. (f) Shi,
Z.; Ding, S.; Cui, Y.; Jiao, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7895. (g)
Zhang, Y.-H.; Shi, B.-F.; Yu, J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5072. (h)
Chen, W.; Zheng, X.; Li, W.; He, J.; Lei, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
4101. (i) Wei, Y.; Zhao, H.; Kan, J.; Su, W.; Hong, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 2522. (j) Zhao, H.; Wang, M.; Su, W.; Hong, M. AdV. Synth.
Catal. 2010, 352, 1301.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 21, 2010
4993