6776
R. Mahesh et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 6773–6776
ment of aromatic amine with aliphatic amines maintained the po-
tency of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. However, to get the conclusive
results quinoxaline ring should be replaced with non-aromatic
group, which will be the futuristic extension of the work.
Acknowledgments
We thank the University Grants Commission (UGC), India, Birla
Institute of Technology & Science (BITS), Pilani, India, and SAIF,
Panjab University, Chandigarh, India, for providing the financial
support, laboratory and analytical facilities, respectively.
Regardless of their potency of 5-HT3 receptor antagonism, all
the synthesized molecules were subjected for their anti-depressant
potentials using forced swim test mice model.12,28 Test compounds
were administered through intra-peritoneal route of a dose of
1 mg/kg body weight. This preliminary study showed compounds
4m, 4p, 4o, 4e, 4i and 4n significantly reduced the duration of
immobility as compared to the vehicle-treated (control) group, fol-
lowed by compounds 4b and 4h. The compounds 4m, 4p, 4o, 4e, 4i
and 4n are more potent than the standard 5-HT3 receptor antago-
nist, ondansetron. The drug-induced psychomotor stimulation may
increase or decrease the swimming behavior in mice FST. To find
out this effect, all the screened molecules were tested for sponta-
neous locomotor activity using actophotometer.12 Interestingly,
none of the test compound influenced the locomotion of mice as
observed in spontaneous locomotor activity (Table 2).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Henry, J. A.; Rivas, C. A. In Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): Past,
Present and Future; Stanford, S. C., Ed.; Landes Co: Austin, Texas, 1999; pp 95–
109.
2. Angst, F.; Stassen, H. H.; Clayton, P. J.; Angst, J. J. Affect. Disord. 2002, 68, 167.
3. Montgomery, S. Medicographia 2005, 27, 213.
4. Pinder, R. M.; Wieringa, J. H. Med. Res. Rev. 1993, 13, 259.
5. Pinder, R. M. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 1990, 2, 213.
Based on the preliminary anti-depressant study, compounds
4m, 4p, 4o, 4e, 4i, 4n, 4b and 4h are selected for a dose–response
assay of mice FST. Compounds 4e, 4n, 4o, and 4p exhibited signif-
icant anti-depressant-like activity in all the tested dose levels as
compared to the control group. Whereas, compounds 4b, 4h and
4m failed to show activity in 0.5 mg/kg dose. However, these mol-
ecules are active in 1 and 2 mg/kg doses, without affecting locomo-
tion. Compound 4i did not show anti-depressant-like activity in
2 mg/kg dose level. This study reveals that 1 mg/kg dose is the
optimum concentration for these molecules (exception for com-
pound 4b); further increasing or decreasing the dose concentration
did not show much improvement in the anti-depressant-like activ-
ity in mice FST, with an exception of compound 4b, where higher
concentration that is, 2 mg/kg dose, is optimum. The compounds
4p, 4i, 4n, 4o and 4e exhibited anti-depressant-like activity greater
than that of ondansetron in 0.5 mg/kg dose and compound 4b
showed almost equipotent activity as compared to ondansetron
in 2 mg/kg dose. The dose-dependent and biphasic dose-effects
exhibited by the synthesized molecules are in agreement with ear-
lier reports8,13 on the effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in mod-
els of depression. This obtained results clearly suggested the
beneficial effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in depression. Fur-
ther, molecular and interaction studies are planned to discover the
exact mechanism of these novel compounds, as an extension of the
current study.
In summary, we have designed 17 novel quinoxalin-2-carbox-
amides as 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the management of
depression using ligand-based approach and the target molecules
were synthesized from the starting material o-phenylenediamine.
All the title compounds exhibited 5-HT3 receptor antagonism;
compounds 4i and 4n showed antagonism greater than the stan-
dard drug, ondansetron. Replacing aromatic group with aliphatic
group in 5-HT3 receptor antagonist resulted in retained antago-
nism, which indicates that the interaction of aromatic group with
5-HT3 receptor may be hydrophobic. Compounds with higher pA2
values significantly decreased the duration of immobility in FST
compared to control, reflecting the anti-depressant-like effect.
These results correlated the beneficial effect of 5-HT3 antagonist
in depression. Hence further studies on these compounds are
planned to obtain clinically useful anti-depressant agents.
6. Ayuso, G. J. L. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 2002, 3, 112.
7. Montgomery, S. A.; Kennedy, S. H.; Burrows, G. D.; Lejoyeux, M.; Hindmarch, I.
Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2004, 19, 271.
8. Srivastava, S. K. Indian J. Pharmacol. 1998, 30, 411.
9. Costall, B.; Naylor, R. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1992, 70, 157.
10. Martin, P.; Gozlan, H.; Puech, A. J. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1992, 212, 73.
11. Giordanr, J.; Rogeres, L. V. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1989, 170, 83.
12. Mahesh, R.; Rajkumar, R.; Minasri, B.; Venkatesha Perumal, R. Pharmazie 2007,
62, 919.
13. Rajkumar, R.; Mahesh, R.; Minasri, B. Behav. Pharmacol. 2008, 19, 29.
14. Bermudez, J.; Fake, C. S.; Joiner, G. F.; Joiner, K. A.; King, F. D.; Miner, W. D.;
Sanger, G. J. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 1924.
15. Hibert, M. F.; Hoffmann, R.; Miller, R. C.; Carr, A. A. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 1594.
16. Rizzi, J. P.; Nagel, A. A.; Rosen, T.; McLean, S.; Seeger, T. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33,
2721.
17. Swain, C. J.; Baker, R.; Kneen, C.; Herbert, R.; Moseley, J.; Saunders, J.; Seward, E.
M.; Stevenson, G. I.; Beer, M.; Stanton, J.; Watling, K.; Ball, R. G. J. Med. Chem.
1992, 35, 1019.
18. Clark, R. D.; Miller, A. B.; Berger, J.; Repke, D. B.; Weinhardt, K. K.; Kowalczyk, B.
A.; Eglen, R. M.; Bonhaus, D. W.; Lee, C. H.; Michel, A. D.; Smith, W. L.; Wonge,
H. F. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 2645.
19. Ohta, M.; Suzuki, T.; Koide, T.; Matsuhisa, A.; Furuya, T.; Miyata, k.;
Yanagisawa, I. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1996, 44, 991.
20. Mahesh, R.; Perumal, R. V.; Pandi, P. V. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 2, 1403.
21. Venkatesha Perumal, R.; Mahesh, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 2769.
22. Harms, E. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2004, 8, 666.
23. Mac Kay, D. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1978, 30, 312.
24. Paton, W. D. M.; Zar, A. M. J. Physiol. 1968, 194, 13.
25. Compound 4a: Yield: 66%; mp: 170–171 °C; IR (KBr, m
max, cmÀ1): 3340 (sharp
N–H str.), 3105, 3060 (aromatic C–H str.), 1670 (C@O str.) 1590, 1480 (C@C,
C@N ring str.), 1560 (N–H bend), 1080 (C–N str.); 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 9.85 (s, 1H,
NH), 9.78 (s, 1H, quinoxaline), 8.23 (m, 2H, quinoxaline), 7.93 (m, 4H, 2H
quinoxaline, 2H benzene), 7.45 (m, 2H, benzene), 7.22 (m, 1H, benzene); Mass
spectra (ESI) of the compound exhibited the molecular ion peak at m/z 250
(M+1)+.
26. Compound 4i: Yield: 59%; mp: 151–153 °C; IR (KBr, m
max, cmÀ1): 3350 (sharp
N–H str.) 3150, 3050, (aromatic C–H str.), 1680 (C@O str.) 1600, 1460 (C@C,
C@N ring str.), 1540 (N–H bend) 1460, (CH3 bend); 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 9.94 (s,
1H, NH), 9.76 (s, 1H, quinoxaline), 8.24 (m, 3H, 2H, quinoxaline, 1H, benzene),
7.94 (m, 2H, quinoxaline), 7.26 (m, 2H, benzene), 2.51 (s, 3H, methyl). Mass
spectra (ESI) of the compound exhibited the molecular ion peak at m/z 320
(M+Na)+.
27. Compound 4n: Yield: 58%; mp: 45–50 °C; IR (KBr, m
max, cmÀ1): 3285 (sharp N–
H str.), 3080, 3060 (aromatic C–H str.), 2980, 2953 (aliphatic C–H str.), 1645
(C@O str.) 1590, 1490 (C@C, C@N ring str.), 1560 (N–H bend); 1H NMR (CDCl3)
d
9.68 (s, 1H, quinoxaline), 8.19 (dd, 1H, quinoxaline), 8.12 (dd, 1H,
quinoxaline), 8.02 (s, 1H, NH) 7.88 (m, 2H, quinoxaline), 3.59 (q, 2H,
NHCH2CH2CH2CH3), 1.73 (quin, 2H, NHCH2CH2CH2CH3), 1.52 (sex,
NHCH2CH2CH2CH3) 1.01 (t, 3H, NHCH2CH2CH2CH3); Mass spectra (ESI) of the
compound exhibited the molecular ion peak at m/z 230 (M+1)+.
28. Porsolt, R. D.; Bertin, A.; Jalfre, M. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 1977, 229, 327.