I. R. Ramazanov et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 6268–6269
6269
CH2I2 + Et3Al
Et2AlCH2I + Et2AlI
Et2AlCH2I
Me
HI
Et2AlCH2I
-Et2AlI
C
I
Me
Et2Al
Me
Et2Al
Me
Me
I
Et2AlCH2I
Et2Al
Me
Scheme 2. The reaction of a-methylphenylallene with CH2I2–Et3Al.
3. Russo, J. M.; Price, W. A. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3589.
4. Synthesis of 1-hexylspiro[2.2]pentane (1a): To solution of n-hexylallene
Scheme 2 shows two possible routes for the formation of com-
pound 4. Investigation of the mechanism of this unusual transfor-
mation and its scope is the subject of further research.
a
(3 mmol) and diiodomethane (0.73 mL, 9 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL), Et3Al
(9 mmol) (Caution: organoaluminums are pyrophoric and can ignite on contact
with air, water, or any oxidant) was added at 0 °C under an argon atmosphere.
The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 8 h. The reaction was
terminated by dilution with CH2Cl2 (10 mL) followed by treatment with an aq
solution of HCl (7 wt %). The aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2
(3 ꢀ 10 mL). The combined organic layers were then washed with satd
NaHCO3 and dried over anhydrous CaCl2. The solvent was removed under
reduced pressure and the residue was distilled to give 0.34 g (74% isolated
yield) of 1a. Bp 87–90 °C (15 Torr).
Earlier, Me3Al–CH2I2 was preferably used for the cyclopropana-
tion of 3,4-pentadien-1-ol.3 It was noted that the use of Et3Al and
i-Bu3Al instead of Me3Al led to the rapid decomposition of alumi-
num carbenoids formed in situ. Contrary to this, in the case of
alkyl- and phenyl-substituted and cyclic allenes, we obtained
cyclopropanation products in high yield using only CH2I2–Et3Al
and CH2I2–i-Bu3Al, whereas the reaction with CH2I2–Me3Al was
slow. We observed the same difference between trialkylalumi-
nums earlier in the reactions with propargyl alcohols.1b The low
activity of Me3Al may be the result of its greater tendency to form
stable complexes.8 In addition, the importance of the procedure
should be emphasized.9
5. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded as CDCl3 solutions on a Bruker Avance
400 (400.13 MHz for 1H and 100.62 MHz for 13C) spectrometer.
6. 1H NMR spectral parameters of compounds 2a were identical to published
data.11a 13C NMR of 3a (d, ppm): 12.45 (2C, C(2, 11)), 19.36 (2C, C(3, 10)), 19.75
(C(1)), 25.10 (2C, C(6, 7)), 27.33 (2C, C(5, 8)), 29.21 (2C, C(4, 9)). 1H NMR of 3a
(d, ppm): 0.45–0.5 (m, 2H, C(2, 11)Ha), 0.7–0.8 (m, 2H, C(2, 11)Hb), 1.15–1.3 (m,
4H, C(4, 9)Ha, C(3, 10)H), 1.3–1.45 (m, 4H, C(5–8)Ha), 1.45–1.7 (m, 4H, C(5–
8)Hb), 2.15–2.25 (m, 2H, C(4–9)Hb).
4
5
Despite the fact that the cyclopropanation of allenes with metal
carbenoids and CH2N2 is a well known method to prepare spir-
opentanes and methylenecyclopropanes, we have revealed herein
some features of the reactions of aluminum carbenoids with alkyl-
and aryl-substituted allenes and cyclic allenes. Unlike zinc carbe-
noids,10 aluminum carbenoids reacted not only with alkyl-substi-
tuted allenes, but also with phenylallene. It should be noted that
the reaction of phenylallene with CH2N2/Pd(acac)2 gave only the
mono-cyclopropanation product, benzylidenecyclopropane, in
49% yield.11a Interestingly, according to the published data,11a,b
1,2-cyclononadiene reacted with CH2N2 in the presence of a palla-
dium catalyst with the formation of 2a in 85% yield. Further reac-
tion of the latter with CH2N2 gave 3a in only 15% yield.
3
2
6
1
7
11
10
8
9
7. The 1H NMR spectrum of 4 in CDCl3 solution shows four multiplets for the
cyclopropyl hydrogen atoms at 0.4–0.8 ppm. The doublet signal of the methyl
group has a cross-peak with the quartet for the hydrogen atom at C(1) in the
COSY spectrum. The quaternary carbon atoms of the benzene moiety are
magnetically non-equivalent due to the lack of symmetry in the molecule. The
HMBC spectrum shows the interaction between the carbon atom at
148.92 ppm and the doublet assigned to the methyl group. 13C NMR (d,
ppm): 8.75 (C(11)), 12.52 (C(12)), 16.82 (C(10)), 26.92 (C(2)), 41.70 (C(3)),
44.45 (C(1)), 123.40 and 124.15 (C(5, 8)), 126.20 (2C, C(6, 7)), 142.42 (C(4)),
148.92 (C(9)). 1H NMR (d, ppm): 0.4–0.5 (m, 1H, C(11)Ha), 0.55–0.6 (m, 1H,
C(12)Ha), 0.6–0.7 (m, 1H, C(12)Hb), 0.75–0.8 (m, 1H, C(11)Hb), 1.12 (d, 3H,
J = 6.8 Hz, C(10)H3), 2.85–3.05 (m, 3H, C(1)H, C(3)H2), 7.1–7.35 (m, 4H, Ar). MS
(m/z, %): 158 (5) [M]+, 143 (5) [MꢁCH3]+, 141 (6), 131 (13), 130 (100), 129 (40),
128 (27), 115 (40). Anal. Calcd for C12H14: C, 91.08; H, 8.92. Found: C, 90.7; H,
8.6.
Thus, compared to other cyclopropanation agents, aluminum
carbenoids show useful activity toward allenes.
5
3
Acknowledgments
12
4
6
2
7
1
11
9
This work was supported by the Department of Chemistry and
Material Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences (program No.
1-OKhNM) and Russian Federation President’s Council on Grants
(grant NSc 4105.2010.3).
8
10
8. Smith, M. B. J. Organomet. Chem. 1972, 46, 31.
9. Slow addition of R3Al to a solution of CH2I2 may lead to the formation of
compounds such as RAl(CH2I)2 and Al(CH2I)3 which are more electrophilic and
are stronger Lewis acids and which may contribute to oligomerization of the
allene. This is especially true for Et3Al and i-Bu3Al, which react with CH2I2 at a
far greater rate than Me3Al. Treatment of CH2I2 with Et3Al or i-Bu3Al (1:1 molar
ratio) in CH2Cl2 at room temperature resulted in the disappearance of CH2I2 in
5 min due to aluminum carbenoid formation. In the case of Me3Al, the
conversion of CH2I2 was 73% over 2 h.
10. (a) Battioni, P.; Vo-Quang, L.; Vo-Quang, Y. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1970, 3942; (b)
Rahman, W.; Kuivila, H. G. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 772.
11. (a) Zefirov, N. S.; Lukin, K. A.; Timofeeva, A. Yu. J. Org. Chem. USSR 1987, 23,
2246; (b) Zimmer, R.; Dinesh, C. U.; Nandanan, E.; Khan, F. A. Chem. Rev. 2000,
100, 3067.
References and notes
1. (a) Ramazanov, I. R.; Dil’mukhametova, L. K.; Khalilov, L. M.; Dzhemilev, U. M.;
Nefedov, O. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6058; (b) Ramazanov, I. R.;
Yumagulova, A. V.; Dzhemilev, U. M.; Nefedov, O. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009,
50, 4233; (c) Ramazanov, I. R.; Dil’mukhametova, L. K.; Dzhemilev, U. M.;
Nefedov, O. M. Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed. 2009, 58, 1349; (d) Ramazanov, I. R.;
Dil’mukhametova, L. K.; Dzhemilev, U. M.; Nefedov, O. M. J. Organomet. Chem.
2010, 695, 1761.
2. (a) Li, Z.-H.; Ke, Z.; Zhao, C.; Geng, Z.-Y.; Wang, Y.-C.; Phillips, D. L.
Organometallics 2006, 25, 3735; (b) Maruoka, K.; Fukutani, Y.; Yamamoto, H.
J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 4412.