Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 2010, 6, No. 24.
monitored by TLC, the solvent was removed at reduced pres- (1:1, 25 mL) and the reaction mixture stirred overnight. The
sure. The residue was purified by normal silica gel chromato- crude mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure, diluted
graphy (MeOH/CH2Cl2, 1:10 to 1:5) to afford the ester as with water and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 25 mL). The
colourless oil (2.06 g, 4.51 mmol) in 82% yield. Rf = 0.42 combined organic layers were dried, concentrated followed and
(CH2Cl2/MeOH, 7:1); [α]D20 = +7.2 (c 1, MeOH); 1H NMR purified by flash chromatography to afford the pure required
(400 MHz, CD3OD) δ = 4.66–4.61 (dt, J = 8.44, 1.56 Hz, 1H, product (1.1 g, 2.2 mmol) in 84% yield. Rf = 0.34 (EtOAc),
5-H), 4.14–4.08 (dq, J = 7.16, 1.54 Hz, 2H, OCH2CH3), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ = 8.18 (dd, J = 7.80, 1.38 Hz,
3.91–3.87 (t, J = 8.52 Hz, 1H, 1’’-H), 3.86–3.47 (m, 5H, 5’’-H2, 1H), 7.65 (m, 2H, 4-H, 5-H), 7.25 (dd, J = 7.55, 1.23 Hz, 1H,
4’’-H, 3’’-H, 2”-H), 3.32–3.28 (dd, J = 8.70, 0.83 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 3-H), 6.90 (d, J = 2.44 Hz, 1H, 5’’’-H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.91 Hz,
3.23–3.20 (m, 1H, 6’-H), 2.65–2.57 (m, 1H, 4-Ha), 2.40–2.34 (t, 1H, 8’’’-H), 6.78 (d, J = 9.71 Hz, 1H, 1’’’-H), 6.68 (dd, J =
J = 7.18 Hz, 2H, 4’-H2), 2.18–2.06 (m, 3H, 4-Hb, 2’-H2), 8.91, 2.44 Hz, 1H, 7’’’-H), 6.47 (dd, J = 9.71, 1.97 Hz, 1H,
1.79–1.71 (m, 2H, 3’-H2), 1.20–1.15 (t, J = 7.12 Hz, 3H, 2’’’-H), 6.38 (d, J = 1.97 Hz, 1H, 4’’’-H), 4.10 (t, J = 5.95 Hz,
OCH2CH3), 1.05 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, 2H, OCH2), 4.01 (m, 2H, OCH2), 3.47 (t, J = 6.50 Hz, 2H,
CD3OD) δ = 177.07 (CONH), 174.22 (COO), 84.19 (C-5’), CH2N3), 2.99 (m, 2H, CH2N3), 2.03, 1.55 (2m, 4H, 2’’-H2,
77.34 (C-5), 72.15, 71.42, 70.63 (C-4’’, C-3’’, C-2”), 70.35 2’’’-H2). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3), δ = 185.56 (C-3’’’),
(C-6’), 65.27 (C-5’’), 62.50 (OCH2CH3), 62.23 (C-3), 61.21 165.23 (C-1’), 163.10 (C-6’’’), 158.70 (C-4a’’’), 154.12
(C(CH3)3, 53.71 (C-1’’), 39.07 (C-4), 35.92 (C-2’), 25.91 (C-5a’’’), 149.67 (C-9a’’’), 134.15 (C-2), 132.78, 131.31,
(C-4’), 25.91 (C(CH3)3), 25.85 (C-3’), 14.45 (OCH2CH3); MS 130.49, 130.11, 130.08, 129.72, 128.90 (C-3, C-4, C-5, C-6,
(ESI): m/z [M+Na]+ calculated for C21H36N2O8[Na]+ 467.2, C-1’’’, C-7’’’, C-8’’’), 130.27 (C-9’’’), 117.71, 114.91 (C-1,
found 467.2.
C-8a’’’), 113.55 (C-5’’’), 105.88 (C-2’’’), 100.93 (C-4’’’),
65.38 (C-1’’’’), 62.37 (C-1’’), 47.92 (C-3’’’’), 47.77 (C-3’’),
28.45 (C-2’’’’), 27.76 (C-2’’).
N-(Hex-5’-ynoyl)neuraminic acid (3)
Isoxazoline (2.50 g, 5.63 mmol) and NaOMe (0.74 mL of 5.4 M
solution in MeOH) in anhydrous MeOH (100 mL) were stirred Cultivation and metabolic labelling of HEp-2 cells
at room temperature overnight. Water (100 mL) was added and Human larynx carcinoma (HEp-2) cells were cultivated in
the solution stirred for further 24 h. The mixture was then neu- Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10%
tralized with acidic ion exchange resin containing formate ions fetal calf serum (FCS) at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. At
(Amberlyte). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure 80% confluence the medium was discarded and the cells
and the crude product subjected for size exclusion chromato- washed with PBS buffer (Gibco). After the addition of 1.5 ml of
graphy with Biogel P2 (Bio-Rad) to afford pure 3 (934 mg) in a trypsin/EDTA mixture, the cells were detached for 5 min at
46% yield. Rf = 0.29 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 5:2); [α]D20 = -19.04 (c 37 °C. They were supplied with 8.5 ml of fresh medium and
1, H2O); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD), β-anomer: δ = ppm split in a ratio of 1:10.
4.09–4.02 (m, 1H, 4-H), 4.03–4.00 (d, J = 10.74 Hz, 1H, 6-H),
3.87–3.81 (t, J = 10.29 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.81–3.79 (dd, J = 11.47, For the metabolic labelling, HEp-2 cells were cultivated as
2.74 Hz, 1H, 9-Ha), 3.74–3.89 (m, 1H, 8-H), 3.64–3.60 (dd, J = described above. Subsequently, at 80% confluence they were
11.21, 5.60, 1H, 9-Hb), 3.52–3.49 (d, J = 9.35, 1H, 7-H), seeded into 6-well dishes and incubated in 2 ml of the medium
3.23–3.20 (m, 1H, 6’-H), 2.42–2.38 (t, J = 7.35 Hz, 2H, 4’-H2), described above. The medium contained 25 μM of the modified
2.26–2.20 (m, 4H, 4-Ha, 4-Hb, 2’-H2), 2.17–2.11 (dd, J = 12.83, carbohydrate to be incorporated (Ac4GlcNAz 16 or Neu5Hex
4.87, H-3eq), 1.86–1.80 (m, 3H H-3ax, 3’-H2); 13C NMR (75 3). The incubation time was 48 hours. The cells were detached
MHz, CD3OD), δ = 177.00 (2 × CONH), 173.49 (COOH), using a cell scraper in order to retain the glycocalyx. 150 μL
96.49 (C-1), 84.05 (C-5’), 72.03 (C-8), 71.55 (C-6), 70.08 from each well was transferred into an 8-well microscopy
(C-7), 70.03 (C-6’), 67.63 (C-4), 64.68 (C-9), 53.94 (C-5), cultivation slide and filled with 150 μL of the fresh medium.
40.94 (C-3), 35.67 (C-2’), 25.64 (C-3’), 18.49 (C-4’); MS The cells were cultivated at the described growth conditions
(ESI): m/z [M-H]- calculated for C14H21NO9[H]- 360.13, found until reattachment. The medium was discarded and the cells
360.2.
were washed several times with PBS buffer (Gibco). The
labelling reaction was performed in the dark with 2 mM of the
complementary labelling molecule 9-[2-carboxy-4-[(2-propyn-
1-ylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3,6-bis(dimethylamino)xanthyl-
ium, alkynylated TAMRA or azido-fluorescein 14) with 2 mM
Benzoic acid 2-[6-(3-azidopropanyloxy)-3-oxo-3H-
xanthen-9-yl] 3-azidopropanyl ester, azido-fluores-
cein (14)
Iodopropyl azide (210 mg, 26 mmol) was added to a solution of CuSO4, 10 mM sodium ascorbate and 2 mM Tris-[(1-benzyl-
fluorescein (1g, 2.6mmol) in a mixture of distilled THF/MeOH 1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl) methyl]amine (TBTA) in DMSO. After
Page 6 of 7
(page number not for citation purposes)