Journal of the American Chemical Society
COMMUNICATION
Table 1. Selected Data for the Dimerization of Various
Substrates Using Monomeric and Polymeric Imidazolium
Saltsa
was also isolated as a product of this reaction in good yield
(Scheme 2) upon aqueous workup of the filtrate and further
purification by flash column chromatography. This procedure
was repeated twice with only a marginal loss in catalytic efficiency
per cycle (see Scheme 2).18 In contrast, the monomeric analogue 3
could not be recovered followingthe dimerizationreactionusing an
analogous protocol.
In summary, a catalytically active, “self-supported” poly-
(NHC) precursor was synthesized via methylation following
the cross-coupling copolymerization of 2 with a fluorenyl boro-
nic acid diester. The corresponding catalyst was generated in situ
and used to facilitate the dimerization of several benzaldehyde
derivatives in good yields. The results presented herein not only
demonstrate that NHCs can display enhanced catalytic activities
upon incorporation into a polymeric framework but also should
enable other NHC-based catalysts to be conveniently regener-
ated and reused.
% yieldb of benzoin
% yieldb of benzil
product 5
product 6
substrate
X = H
with 3
with poly(3)
with 3
with poly(3)
67
15
9
67
47
43
52
0
6
2
9
0
10
4
X = m-Br
X = p-CF3
X = p-OCH3
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
29
9
a In a typical experiment, 2.94 mmol of substrate, to mol % of 3 or the
repeat unit of poly(3), 15 mol % DBU, and 2.0 mL of dry DMSO were
stirred for 40 h at 25 °C under argon. b Isolated yield.
S
Supporting Information. Additional experimental de-
b
tails and spectroscopic data. This material is available free of
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Scheme 2. Schematic Representation of the Procedure Used
to Recycle and Reuse Poly(3)
Corresponding Author
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are grateful to the Robert A. Welch Foundation (Grants
F-0003 to A.H.C. and F-1621 to C.W.B.) for their generous
support of this work.
’ REFERENCES
(1) For excellent reviews on using NHCÀtransition metal com-
plexes to facilitate various catalytic reactions, see: (a) Díez-Gonzꢀalez, S.;
Marion, S. P.; Nolan, S. P. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3612–3676. (b) W€urtz,
S.; Glorius, F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1523–1533. (c) John, A.; Ghosh,
P. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 7183–7206.
(2) (a) Gruttadauria, M.; Giacalone, F.; Noto, R. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2008, 37, 1666–1688. (b) Youk, S. H.; Oh, S. H.; Rho, H. S.; Lee, J. E.;
Lee, J. W.; Song, C. E. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2220–2222. (c) Heitbaum,
M.; Glorius, F.; Escher, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4732–4762.
(d) Parida, K. M.; Singha, S.; Sahoo, P. C. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2010,
325, 40–47. (e) Parida, K. M.; Rath, D. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2009,
310, 93–100.
(3) (a) Kristensen, T. E.; Hansen, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2010, 3179–3204. (b) Parida, K. M.; Rath, D.; Dash, S. S. J. Mol. Catal.
A: Chem. 2010, 318, 85–93.
(4) For examples of recyclable organocatalysts, see: (a) Rodríguez
Llansola, F.; Miravet, J. F.; Escuder, B. Chem. Commun.
2009, 7303–7305. (b) Ghosh, S. K.; Zheng, Z.; Ni, B. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2010, 352, 2378–2382.
(5) (a) Marion, N.; Díez-Gonzꢀalez, S.; Nolan, S. P. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2007, 46, 2988–3000. (b) Enders, D.; Niemeier, O.; Henseler, A.
Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5606–5655. (c) Struble, J. R.; Bode, J. W.
Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 4957–4967. (d) Phillips, E. M.; Wadamoto, M.;
Roth, H. S.; Ott, A. W.; Scheidt, K. A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 105–108. (e)
Kaeobamrung, J.; Kozlowski, M. C.; Bode, J. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.
A. 2010, 107, 20661–20665. (f) Moore, J. L.; Rovis, T. Top. Curr. Chem.
2010, 291, 77–144. (g) Denk, M. K.; Hezarkhani, A.; Zheng, F.-L. Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem. 2007, 22, 3527–5734. (h) Jokiꢀc, N. B.; Straubinger, C. S.;
directed toward optimizing the reaction conditions, which
included catalyst loading, temperature, base (to generate the
free NHC in situ), solvent, and time (see Supporting In-
formation). Using optimized conditions (DBU as base, minimal
DMSO, room temperature, 40 h), the catalytic activities of 3 and
poly(3) were explored using benzaldehyde and a range of
functionalized derivatives. As shown in Table 1, the catalytic
activity exhibited by poly(3) was similar to that of 3; however,
higher yields of products were obtained with the former when
electron-rich or -deficient benzaldehydes were employed. As
noted above, the enhanced reactivity may be due to a synergistic
effect between the catalytically active sites along the polymer
backbone.15,16 In some cases, the corresponding benzil products
were detected in small amounts (e10%), which may be attrib-
uted to the mildly oxidizing properties of DMSO.17
The ability of poly(3) to be recovered and reused was also
explored. After stirring a mixture of benzaldehyde, poly(3),
DBU, and DMSO under an atmosphere of argon for 40 h, a
solution of 4.0 M HCl in dioxane was added. The reaction
mixture was stirred for an additional 1 h, after which excess ethyl
acetate was added. Subsequent collection of the yellow precipitate
via filtration afforded poly(3) in an isolated yield of 92%, as verified
by 1H NMR spectroscopy (the diagnostic imidazolium proton was
observed as a broad singlet at δ = 9.50 ppm; DMSO-d6). Benzoin
5219
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja200602e |J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5218–5220