3438
Y. Kim et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 3435–3438
group with amino acids would substantially improve the
solubility of the compounds in aqueous system. In
addition, the amino acid derivatives were expected to be
sufficiently reversible, partly due to the folding effects of
the side chain amino group, similar to the case of 6. This
prompted us to synthesize 8 additional amino acid pro-
drugs (10–17) of 2.
Gensler, W. J.; Horwitz, S. B. Cancer Res. 1978, 38, 2688.
Stahelin, H.; Wartburg, A. Progress Drug Res. 1989, 33, 169.
4. Kim, Y.; You, Y. J.; Kim, S. B.; Ahn, B. Z. Planta Med.
2001, 68, 271.
5. Terada, T.; Fujimoto, K.; Nomura, M.; Yamashita, J.;
Kobunai, T.; Takeda, S.; Wierzba, K.; Yamada, Y.; Yama-
guchi, H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 2720.
6. Kozawa, M.; Baba, K.; Matsuyama, Y.; Kido, T.; Sakai,
M.; Takemoto, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1982, 30, 2885.
7. Laurent, D.; Yves, G.; Demerseman, P.; Kruczynski, A.;
Etievant, C.; Imbert, T.; Hill, B. T.; Monneret, C. J. Med.
Chem. 1998, 41, 4475.
The synthesized amino acid prodrugs showed excellent
water solubilities. For example, the water solubility of
40-demethyl-40-O-(8-aminohexanoyl)-DPT (15), a repre-
sentative selected from the 40-demethyl-40-O-(amino-
acyl)-DPT compounds (10–17), was 50 times higher
than that of the parent compound DDPT (data not
shown).9 The high water solubility allowed these com-
pounds to be administered at the maximum tolerated
doses. In the BDF1/3LL model, most of the amino acid
prodrugs (12–17) showed potent antitumor activity with
IR of 80–89%, higher than the IR value (78%) of eto-
poside (Table 1). However, compounds 10 and 11
showed relatively weak activity with IR values of 41and
33%, respectively, much lower than that of other amino
acid derivatives (12–17). The weak in vivo activity of 10
and 11 could be due to their premature hydrolysis
caused by the electron-withdrawing effects of the a-
protonated amino group. In contrast, the presence of
the phenyl moiety in 12 might somewhat lower the rate
of hydrolysis of this compound compared to 10 and 11,
resulting in its potent antitumor activity. In summary,
we have reported the synthesis of a series of prodrugs of
compound 2 (40-demethyl-4-deoxypodophylotoxin). Ele-
ven compounds among 15 prodrugs prepared showed
enhanced in vivo antitumor activity compared to the
parent compound 2. The carbamate 6 offered the best
antitumor activity with IR of 95%, followed by the
carbonate 9 (IR value of 89%) and amino acid ester 15
(IR values of 87%). The results demonstrate that the
design and synthesis of the presented prodrugs are ben-
eficial for therapeutic values of the compound 2. The
approaches may be applicable for other antitumor
agents, which possess similar functional features with 2.
8. All newly synthesized compounds gave satisfactory analy-
1
tical and spectroscopic data. 6; H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): d
6.68 (s, 1H), 6.53 (s, 1H), 6.39 (s, 2H), 5.93 (s, 2H), 4.90 (br,
1H), 4.60 (d, J=3.80 Hz, 1H), 4.52–4.40 (m, 1H), 3.99–3.62
(m, 9H), 3.25–2.69 (m, 6H). Anal. calcd for C24H25NO9: C,
61.14; H, 5.34; N, 2.97; found: C, 61.03; H, 6.5.38; N, 2.95. 9;
1H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): d 6.67 (s, 1H), 6.53 (s, 1H), 6.37
(s, 2H), 5.91(s, 2H), 4.66 (d, J=3.81Hz, 1H), 4.52–4.41(m,
1H), 3.98–3.62 (m, 9H), 3.24–2.72 (m, 6H). Anal. calcd for
C24H23ClO9: C, 58.72; H, 4.72; found: C, 58.62; H, 4.68. 15;
1H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.68 (br, 2H), 6.65 (s, 1H), 6.49
(s, 1H), 6.37 (s, 2H), 5.92 (s, 2H), 4.58 (d, J=3.84 Hz, 1H),
4.44–4.34 (m, 1H), 3.99–3.66 (m, 7H), 3.02–2.54 (m, 8H),
1.90–1.26 (m, 6H). Anal. calcd for C27H31NO8: C, 65.18; H,
6.28; N, 2.82; found: C, 65.00; H, 6.22; N, 2.79.
9. Water solubility was measured by a method described in
literature: Itoh, M.; Hagiwara, D.; Kamiya, T. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1977, 50, 718.
10. Ohisumi, K.; Hatanaka, T.; Nakagawa, R.; Fukuda, Y.;
Morinaga, Y.; Suga, Y.; Nihei, Y.; Ohishi, K.; Akiyama, Y.;
Tsuji, T. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 1999, 14, 539.
11. Olsson, O. A. T.; Svensson, L. A. Pharm. Res. 1984, 1, 1 9.
12. Thorberg, S. O.; Berg, S.; Lundstorm, J.; Pettersson, B.;
Wijkstorm, A.; Sanchez, D.; Lindberg, P.; Nilsson, J. L. G.
J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30, 2008.
13. Vlieghe, P.; Bihel, F.; Clerc, T.; Pannecouque, C.; Witv-
rouw, M.; Erik, D. C.; Salles, J. P.; Chermann, J. C.; Kraus,
J. L. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 777.
14. Cytotoxicity was determined by a method described pre-
viously. Skehan, P.; Storeng, R.; Scudiero, D.; Monk, A.;
MacMahon, J.; Vistica, D.; Warren, J.; Bokesch, H.; Kenny,
S.; Boyd, M. R. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1107.
15. Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells were transplanted sc
into the auxillary region of the BDF1mice. 24 h after tumor
cell transplantation, compounds tested (0.06 mmol/kg/day)
were intraperitoneally injected on days 1, 5 and 9. The tumor
sizes (width and length) were measured on day 17, and tumor
volume (TV) was calculated according to the following for-
mula: TV (mm3)=L (mm)ꢁW2 (mm2)/2, where L and W
represent the length and the width of the tumor mass, respec-
tively. The inhibition rate (IR) was calculated according to the
following formula: IR (%)=[(mean TV of the control group-
mean TV of the treated group)/mean TV of the control
group]ꢁ100.
References and Notes
1. Noguchi, T.; Kawanami, M. Yakugaku Zasshi 1940, 60,
629.
2. King, L. S.; Sullivan, M. S. Science 1946, 104, 244.
3. Gensler, W. J.; Murthy, C. A.; Tranneli, M. H. J. Med.
Chem. 1977, 20, 635. Loike, D.; Brewer, G. F.; Streniicht, H.;