Steric Enforcement of cis-Epoxide Formation in the Radical C-O-Coupling Reaction by Which (S)-2-Hydroxypropylphosphonate Epoxidase (HppE) Produces Fosfomycin

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/jacs.9b10974

(S)-2-Hydroxypropylphosphonate [(S)-2-HPP, 1] epoxidase (HppE) reduces H₂O₂ at its nonheme-iron cofactor to install the oxirane "warhead" of the antibiotic fosfomycin. The net replacement of the C1 pro-R hydrogen of 1 by its C2 oxygen, with inversion of configuration at C1, yields the cis-epoxide of the drug [(1R,2S)-epoxypropylphosphonic acid (cis-Fos, 2)]. Here we show that HppE achieves ～95% selectivity for C1 inversion and cis-epoxide formation via steric guidance of a radical-coupling mechanism. Published structures of the HppE·Fe^II·1 and HppE·Zn^II·2 complexes reveal distinct pockets for C3 of the substrate and product and identify four hydrophobic residues - Leu120, Leu144, Phe182, and Leu193 - close to C3 in one of the complexes. Replacement of Leu193 in the substrate C3 pocket with the bulkier Phe enhances stereoselectivity (cis:trans ～99:1), whereas the Leu120Phe substitution in the product C3 pocket diminishes it (～82:18). Retention of C1 configuration and trans-epoxide formation become predominant with the bulk-reducing Phe182Ala substitution in the substrate C3 pocket (～13:87), trifluorination of C3 (～23:77), or both (～1:99). The effect of C3 trifluorination is counteracted by the more constrained substrate C3 pockets in the Leu193Phe (～56:44) and Leu144Phe/Leu193Phe (～90:10) variants. The ability of HppE to epoxidize substrate analogues bearing halogens at C3, C1, or both is inconsistent with a published hypothesis of polar cyclization via a C1 carbocation. Rather, specific enzyme-substrate contacts drive inversion of the C1 radical - as proposed in a recent computational study - to direct formation of the more potently antibacterial cis-epoxide by radicaloid C-O coupling.

Full text of DOI:10.1021/jacs.9b10974

Subscriber access provided by University of Winnipeg Library
Article
Steric enforcement of cis-epoxide formation in
the radical C–O-coupling reaction by which (S)-2-
hydroxypropylphosphonate epoxidase (HppE) produces Fosfomycin
Shengbin Zhou, Juan Pan, Katherine M. Davis, Irene Schaperdoth,
Bo Wang, Amie K. Boal, Carsten Krebs, and J. Martin Bollinger
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b10974 • Publication Date (Web): 26 Nov 2019
Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on November 27, 2019
Just Accepted
“Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted
online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical
Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination
of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in
full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully
peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the
Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore,
the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After
a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web
site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes
to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and
ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or
consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W.,
Washington, DC 20036
Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society.
However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works
produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course
of their duties.

Page 1 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
Steric enforcement of cis-epoxide formation in the radical C–O-coupling reaction by which
5
6
(S)-2-hydroxypropylphosphonate epoxidase (HppE) produces Fosfomycin
7
8
9
Shengbin Zhou,* Juan Pan, Katherine M. Davis,† Irene Schaperdoth, Bo Wang, Amie K. Boal,
Carsten Krebs,* J. Martin Bollinger, Jr.*
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Department of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States
*Corresponding authors: szz59@psu.edu, ckrebs@psu.edu, jmb21@psu.edu
†Present address: Department of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States
ABSTRACT: (S)-2-hydroxypropylphosphonate [(S)-2-HPP, 1] epoxidase (HppE) reduces H2O2
at its non-heme-iron cofactor to install the oxirane “warhead” of the antibiotic fosfomycin. The net
replacement of the C1 pro-R hydrogen of 1 by its C2 oxygen, with inversion of configuration at
C1, yields the cis epoxide of the drug [(1R,2S)-epoxypropylphosphonic acid (cis-Fos, 2)]. Here we
show that HppE achieves ~ 95% selectivity for C1 inversion and cis-epoxide formation via steric
guidance of a radical-coupling mechanism. Published structures of the HppE•FeII•1 and
HppE•ZnII•2 complexes reveal distinct pockets for C3 of the substrate and product and identify
four hydrophobic residues – Leu120, Leu144, Phe182, and Leu193 – close to C3 in one of the
complexes. Replacement of Leu193 in the substrate C3 pocket with the bulkier Phe enhances
stereoselectivity (cis:trans ~ 99:1), whereas the Leu120Phe substitution in the product C3 pocket
diminishes it (~ 82:18). Retention of C1 configuration and trans-epoxide formation become
predominant with the bulk-reducing Phe182Ala substitution in the substrate C3 pocket (~ 13:87),
trifluorination of C3 (~ 23:77), or both (~ 1:99). The effect of C3 trifluorination is counteracted by
the more constrained substrate C3 pockets in the Leu193Phe (~ 56:44) and Leu144Phe/Leu193Phe
(~ 90:10) variants. The ability of HppE to epoxidize substrate analogues bearing halogens at C3,
C1, or both is inconsistent with a published hypothesis of polar cyclization via a C1 carbocation.
Rather, specific enzyme-substrate contacts drive inversion of the C1 radical – as proposed in a
recent computational study – to direct formation of the more potently antibacterial cis epoxide by
radicaloid C–O coupling.
KEY WORDS: iron, peroxidase, stereochemistry, oxirane, antibacterial
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 2 of 31
1
2
3
4
INTRODUCTION
5
6
7
8
The strained oxirane (epoxide) moiety readily undergoes ring-opening by nucleophilic attack
and can thus serve as the basis for covalent modification of drug targets.1 The naturally occurring
antibiotic, fosfomycin [(1R,2S)-epoxypropylphosphonic acid; cis-Fos, 2], provides a classic
example.2 Widely used to treat urinary tract infections, fosfomycin targets UDP-N-
acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA), a key enzyme in bacterial peptidoglycan
biosynthesis.3 Attack of a cysteine residue in the active site of MurA opens the epoxide, resulting
in covalent coupling and enzyme inactivation.3,4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Enzymatic installation of an epoxide proceeds by one of two main routes: cyclic coupling of
an oxygen-atom equivalent to both carbons of an olefin or cyclization of an alcohol.5 The epoxide
warhead of fosfomycin is installed by the latter route.6 The enzyme S-2-
hydroxypropylphosphonate [(S)-2-HPP, 1] epoxidase (HppE) removes a hydrogen atom (H•) from
C1 of 1 and couples this carbon to the alcohol oxygen on C2 (Scheme 1A).7 For many years, HppE
was thought to activate dioxygen at its non-heme Fe(II) cofactor to generate the H•-abstracting
intermediate.6 However, more recent work showed that the oxidizing co-substrate of HppE is
actually hydrogen peroxide (Scheme 1A).7 This same study speculated that O–O-bond heterolysis
following addition of the peroxide to the Fe(II) cofactor would produce an Fe(IV)-oxo (ferryl)
intermediate (Scheme S1, route A),7 known in other systems to abstract H• from unactivated
aliphatic carbon centers.8 However, a more recent computational study questioned the feasibility
of such a pathway and suggested, instead, cofactor-promoted homolysis of the peroxide bond to
form a hydroxyl radical, oriented for abstraction of H• from C1 by hydrogen bonding to the Fe(III)-
coordinated hydroxide derived from the other peroxide oxygen (Scheme S1, route B).9 To date, no
experimental data to distinguish between these two possibilities have been reported.
Multiple mechanisms have also been considered for the ensuing C1  O–C2 coupling step
(Scheme 1B),6, 9-10 and no consensus has yet been reached. In the reactions of several other non-
heme-iron enzymes that cleave strong C–H bonds to install heteroatoms (e.g., isopenicillin N
synthase, the aliphatic halogenases, and several radical-SAM enzymes), carbon-centered radicals
attack the Fe(III)-coordinated heteroatoms (X) to form the new C–X bonds, in the process reducing
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
the Fe(III) to Fe(II).11-19 A recent study of an inorganic model complex demonstrated ether C–O-
bond formation by this mechanism.20 Given that the iron cofactor of HppE also coordinates the
(C2) oxygen of 1 that couples to C1 (Figure 1A), an analogous radical-coupling mechanism would
seem likely for its cyclization step (Scheme 1B, blue arrows). However, two experimental
observations – the unexpected stereochemical course of the native epoxidation reaction21 and the
nature of a distinct oxidation of a substrate analog22-23 – have led to consideration of more complex
C–O-coupling mechanisms. HppE removes the pro-R hydrogen from C1 of 1,24 consistent with
the orientation of the substrate in published x-ray crystal structures of the complex (Figure 1A).25-26
Coupling of the C2 oxygen to C1 in the site vacated by the abstracted H• would yield the 1S
configuration and trans epoxide (trans-Fos, 3), rather than the 1R configuration and cis epoxide of
the actual antibiotic, 2. In other words, C1  O–C2 coupling proceeds with inversion of
configuration at C1.7 By contrast, in the simplest radical-coupling mechanism, retention of
configuration at C1 would be anticipated (Scheme 1B, blue arrows). Consequently, a mechanism
involving an initial radical coupling of the coordinated phosphonate oxygen (with retention at C1)
and subsequent nucleophilic attack (SN2) of the C2 oxygen upon the carbon of the unstable C-P-
O heterocycle (with inversion), was proposed (purple arrows).7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
HppE is capable of a number of alternative outcomes when challenged with structural isomers
of its substrate (Scheme S2). In addition to its native epoxidation of 1 (Scheme S2A), it can
dehydrogenate the alcohol groups of (R)-2-HPP and (S)-1-HPP to carbonyls (Schemes S2B-C).22-
23 The former outcome implies that the enzyme can also remove H• from C2, when differences in
substrate structure position this carbon appropriately. More interestingly, (R)-1-HPP undergoes an
oxidative 1,2-phosphonate migration, yielding 2-phosphonopropanal (Scheme S2D).22 This
outcome was rationalized in terms of H• abstraction from C2, electron transfer from this radical to
an oxidized form of the iron cofactor, and migration of the phosphonate to quench the resulting
C2 carbocation.10, 22 An analogous pathway – H• abstraction from C1 of 1, electron transfer from
–
the C1 radical to the cofactor, and polar C1+  O–C2 coupling – was suggested for the native
epoxidation reaction.22 At that time, O2 was still thought to be the oxidizing co-substrate, leading
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 4 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
to the proposal of H• abstraction by a superoxo-Fe(III) complex and electron transfer to a ferryl
form of the cofactor, but an analogous mechanism via C1 carbocation can be formulated with H2O2
as the oxidant (Scheme 1B, orange arrows).7 The hypothesis of a planar C1 carbocation
intermediate would, in principle, explain why the expectation of strict retention in the ring-closure
step is not met, but it would not, a priori, lead one to expect high selectivity for inversion. The
aforementioned computational study put forth a different explanation – facile inversion of the C1
radical9 – for the stereochemical course of the ring-closure step (Scheme 1B, red arrows), thus
potentially rationalizing this crucial aspect of the reaction within the framework of the chemical
mechanism that would, in light of precedent, seem most probable.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
In this study, we sought to clarify the mechanism of the C–O-coupling step in the HppE
reaction by assessing (i) whether substrate analogs harboring electron withdrawing groups, which
would be expected to disfavor C1-carbocation formation, can be epoxidized and (ii) whether
sterically consequential modifications to the substrate or enzyme can change the stereochemical
course of the reaction. The ability of the enzyme to epoxidize analogs bearing halogens at C3 (1-
3 fluorine atoms), C1 (fluorine or chlorine), or both weighs heavily against the carbocation
mechanism (Scheme 1B, orange arrows), and the demonstration that modifications to the substrate
or enzyme, chosen rationally on the basis of published x-ray crystal structures, can completely
reverse the ring-closure stereochemistry provides argument against a chemically enforced C1
inversion, as in the mechanism involving intermediary radical coupling and SN2 heterocycle
interconversion (Scheme 1B, purple arrows). The data thus drastically limit the mechanistic
possibilities, decisively favoring a sterically enforced inversion of the C1 radical and subsequent
radicaloid C1  O–C2 coupling (Scheme 1B, red arrows). The observation of diminished
antibiotic activities of the trans-epoxide compounds generated either from the 3-F3-substituted
analog of (S)-2-HPP by the wild-type enzyme or from the native substrate by site-directed variants
implies that the ability of HppE to direct C1 inversion and cis-epoxide formation in the ring-closure
step is essential to its biological role, which is, presumably, to produce a competition-suppressing,
antimicrobial secondary metabolite.
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
5
6
7
8
Mixed stereochemistry in the C–O-coupling (cyclization) step of the HppE reaction. Although
published work has established that the predominant outcome in the oxidation of 1 by HppE is,
effectively, replacement of the C1 pro-R hydrogen by the C2 oxygen with inversion of
configuration at C1 (producing cis-Fos, 2; Scheme 1A and Figure 2A),6-7 one study examining
production of Fos in vivo reported observation of a small quantity of the trans epoxide, [(1S,2S)-
epoxypropylphosphonic acid; trans-Fos, 3],27 potentially arising from competing retention at C1
in the HppE-catalyzed cyclization (Scheme 1B, blue arrows, and Figure 2A). Because even a small
degree of stereo-ambiguity in this step would rule out the mechanism enforcing inversion (Scheme
1B, purple arrows), we deemed it important to test directly for in vitro production of 3 by HppE.
Accordingly, we synthesized the racemic trans isomer (rac-3, composed of 3 and its 1R,2R
enantiomer; see Supplemental Methods in the Supporting Information for details of the synthetic
procedure) in order to compare its 1H- and 31P-NMR spectra to those of the commercially available
cis compound, 2). Rac-3 is readily distinguished from 2 by (i) the diminished downfield shifts of
its C1-1H and C2-1H resonances and ~ 2-fold weaker vicinal coupling21 (3JH-H; Figure 2B-C, top
and middle spectra) and (ii) the increased downfield shift of its 31P resonance (Figure 2D, top and
middle spectra) and stronger 31P-1H geminal coupling (2JP-H; Figure 2C, top and middle spectra).
These distinctions afforded the tools to determine relative yields of the cis and trans products in
the reactions of all combinations of modified substrates and variant enzymes examined in this
work.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
1H-NMR (Figure 2B-C, bottom spectra) and 31P-NMR (Figure 2D, bottom spectrum) spectra
of the products from the HppE reaction with 1 (see SI, Sec 2.2 for detailed procedures) confirm
that, indeed, the enzyme does produce a small quantity (3-5 % of the total epoxide) of trans-Fos,
3, suggesting that ring closure with retention competes to a minor extent with the predominant C1-
inverting pathway. To verify that formation of 3 still involves removal of the pro-R hydrogen,6-7,24
we synthesized both 1-[2H1]-(S)-2-HPP diastereomers (SI Sec 2.3 and 6.1; Figure S2) and
subjected them to oxidation by HppE. Analysis by 31P-NMR spectroscopy (Figure 3; Figure S3)
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 6 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
showed that, as expected, the (1S,2S) diastereomer, 1d, yields the monodeuterated cis- and trans-
epoxide products, 2d and 3d, in the characteristic ~ 95:5 ratio (panel B, top), whereas the (1R,2S)
diastereomer, 1e, yields the same ratio of cis and trans epoxides (2 and 3) with protium at C1 (panel
B, bottom). These results confirm that the cis and trans products form by initial removal of the
same (pro-R) hydrogen and subsequent ring-closure with opposite stereochemistry, weighing
against the proposed mechanism involving an intermediary coupling step via the C–P–O
heterocycle (Scheme 1B, purple arrows).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Structure-guided mutagenesis to alter cyclization stereochemistry. The above evidence
against the sole mechanism that could enforce net inversion in the ring-closure step implies that
the enzyme controls the reaction stereochemistry sterically, by favoring either (i) radicaloid ring
closure from the inverted configuration of the C1 radical (Scheme 1B, red arrows) or (ii) the
“back-side” trajectory for attack of the C2 oxygen on the planar C1 carbocation (Scheme 1B,
orange arrows). We examined the published HppE structures25, 28 (Figure 1) for active-site
residues and enzyme-substrate/product interactions that might contribute to this steric control.
From the best available structures of the HppE•1 (A) and HppE•2 (B) complexes, we identified
four hydrophobic residues in the active site that are within 5 Å of the C3 methyl group in one of
the two complexes and ≥ 0.5 Å closer in one complex than in the other. Leu193 (L193) and Phe182
(F182) are markedly (~ 1.5 Å) closer to C3 in the model of the substrate complex than in that of
the product complex, and L144 appears to be slightly (~ 0.5 Å) closer. These three residues make
up the substrate-C3 binding pocket. Conversely, L120 is nearly 3 Å closer in the model of the
product complex and largely defines the product-C3 pocket. It appears – although there is no
available structure to confirm – that the trans-epoxide product, 3, generated by ring closure with
retention of configuration at C1, would project its C3 group toward the substrate-C3 pocket, and
so we reasoned that amino acid substitutions contracting this pocket (by increasing the volume of
the side chains lining it) might enhance selectivity for C1 inversion, whereas expansion of the
pocket (by bulk-reducing substitutions to the residues defining it) might diminish the
stereoselectivity. Conversely, we expected that bulk-enhancing substitutions of L120 would
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
constrict the product-C3 pocket and diminish selectivity for C1 inversion and cis-epoxide (2)
formation. We prepared the L193F and L144F/L193F variant proteins to evaluate the effect of
constriction, and the F182A variant to evaluate the effect of expansion, of the substrate-C3 pocket.
Similarly, we prepared the L120F variant to assess the impact of a constricted product-C3 pocket.
All four proteins were sufficiently soluble and stable to be characterized after production in and
purification from Escherichia coli, although the F182A protein was seen to lose activity upon
freeze-thaw cycles. All four proteins proved capable of multiple turnovers of (S)-2-HPP with H2O2
as oxidizing co-substrate, although the total turnover numbers (TTNs) achieved with the variant
proteins were diminished from that obtained with the wild-type enzyme (~ 40) to a minimum of ~
3 for the L144F/L193F double variant (Figure S4). For the two variant proteins that exhibited the
most striking effects on the reaction stereochemistry (F182A and L193F; vide infra), we
determined the H2O2:product stoichiometries to compare to that of wild-type HppE, which we
previously reported7 and verified here (Figure S5A-C) to be indistinguishable from the theoretical
value of unity. Both variant proteins retain the ability to fully couple H2O2 reduction to (S)-2-HPP
oxidation (Figure S5D-I).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
31
Characterization of the reaction products by P-NMR spectroscopy (Figures 4B and S6)
revealed that, as predicted from analysis of the published structures, expansion of the substrate-C3
pocket by replacement of the phenyl group of F182 with hydrogen (i.e., the F182A substitution)
diminishes selectivity for C1 inversion in the ring-closure step. The F182A variant produces
predominantly the trans-Fos isomer, 3 (Figure 4B, bottom, Figure S6). A cis:trans (2:3) ratio of
31
12:88 was obtained by averaging 3 replicates of the P-NMR analysis; standard deviations are
given in parentheses. By use of the stereospecifically 1-[2H1]-labeled substrates, 1d and 1e, we
confirmed that the variant protein still abstracts the pro-R hydrogen (Figure S7A): the former
substrate yields the 12:88 mixture of monodeuterated epoxide products (2d:3d), whereas the latter
substrate yields the equivalent mixture of epoxides lacking deuterium (2:3; Figure S7A, middle).
Increased bulk in the product-C3 pocket, imparted by the L120F substitution, was also seen to
diminish selectivity (Figure 4B, second from bottom, Figure S6), albeit to a more modest extent
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 8 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
(2:3 ~ 82:18) than the F182A substitution. We saw the opposite effect on ring-closure
stereoselectivity upon introducing the L193F substitution (Figure 4B, top; Figure S6), predicted
by the structural analysis to constrict the substrate-C3 pocket. This variant protein is, remarkably,
more stereoselective than the wild-type enzyme, producing a fraction of the trans epoxide, 3, so
small (~ 1%) as to be challenging to detect. We again verified that this variant removes the pro-R
hydrogen in the cyclization reaction (Figure S7B). The accuracy of these several predictions
regarding ring-closure stereochemistry confirms the hypothesis on which they were founded – that
HppE controls the outcome by a steric mechanism rather than by leveraging a multi-step pathway
(Scheme 1B, purple arrows) that enforces inversion.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Use of halogen substitution to distinguish between polar and radicaloid C–O-coupling
mechanisms. We next sought to distinguish whether the enzyme directs C1 inversion (i) by tuning
the relative stabilities within the active site of the two configurations of the C1 radical (Scheme
1B, red arrows) or (ii) by impacting the relative barrier heights of the two possible trajectories for
attack of the C2 oxygen on the C1 carbocation (Scheme 1B, orange arrows and green arrows).
We reasoned that carbocation formation would be disfavored by the presence of strongly electron-
withdrawing groups on the substrate, whereas the radicaloid mechanism would be more robust to
such modifications.10 We therefore synthetically incorporated halogen atoms at C3, C1, or both
and evaluated the ability of HppE to cyclize these analogues. Comparison of the 1H-NMR spectra
of the products generated by the wild-type enzyme from the 3-F3-substituted (S)-2-HPP analog
(1c) to the spectra of the corresponding synthetic cis- and trans-epoxide standards (2c and 3c,
respectively) showed that replacement of even all three C3 hydrogens by fluorine does not prevent
HppE-catalyzed epoxidation (Figure S8). Intriguingly, trifluorination of C3 does markedly impact
1
31
the stereochemistry: H-NMR (Figure S8), P-NMR (Figure 4C, middle spectrum; Figure S10),
and 19F-NMR (Figure S11) spectra were all consistent with a cis:trans (2c:3c) product ratio of ~
23:77, a selectivity reversed from that seen with the native substrate. All three fluorine atoms are
required for this effect on the stereoschemistry: we found the 3-F- (1a) and 3-F2- (1b) substrates
to yield cis:trans ratios (2a,b:3a,b) similar to those obtained with the native substrate, 1 (Figure
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
4D-E; Figures S12-16). With the C3-trifluorinated analogue (1c), the more cis-stereoselective
L193F variant produces more of the cis-epoxide product (2c:3c ~ 56:44; Figure 4C, second from
top; Figures S10-11) than does the wild-type enzyme, and the L144F/L193F double variant is even
more selective for this product (Figure 4C, top; Figures S10-11), giving a cis:trans (2c:3c) ratio (~
90:10) that approaches that for the wild-type enzyme with the native substrate. Conversely, the
less cis-selective F182A variant produces almost exclusively (~ 1:99) trans epoxide 3c (Figure 4C,
bottom; Figures S10-11). Thus, the trans-favoring effect of 3-F3 substitution is both counteracted
by constriction of the substrate-C3 pocket and potentiated by expansion of the pocket. The parallel
responses of the 3-F3-substituted and native substrates to these active-site amino acid substitutions
implies that cyclization of the two compounds proceeds by the same mechanism. Most likely, the
energetic cost of eclipsing the trifluoromethyl and phosphonate groups in the trajectory29 for C1
inversion/cis-epoxide formation is greater than that incurred with the unsubstituted C3 methyl
group (Figure S9), resulting in more C1 retention and trans-epoxide production with the analog.
Fluorine substitution markedly destabilizes organic cations,10, 30-31 even when the carbon atom
bearing the halogen is separated from the cationic site by an “insulating” sp3-hybridized carbon,
as would be the case here for a polar cyclization mechanism. For example, the pKa of the
ethylammonium cation is 10.8, whereas that of the 2,2,2-trifluoroethylammonium cation is 5.6.32-
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
33
In this case, trifluorination diminishes the pKa of the  nitrogen substituent by ~ 5 units,
corresponding to a relative destabilization of the cation by almost 30 kJ/mol (at 20 °C).34
Extrapolated to the proposed C1 carbocation intermediate in the HppE reaction, this effect would
correspond to an increase in its reduction potential of ~ 300 mV. It seems unlikely that carbocation
formation would remain robust to such a severe perturbation, implying that a radicaloid
mechanism for C2–O  C1 coupling is more likely. To provide additional evidence for this
conclusion, we tested the (S)-2-HPP analogs containing either (i) halogens at both C3 (F3) and C1
(chlorine) or (ii) fluorine at C1 for the ability to serve as HppE substrates. In the case of the 1-Cl-
3-F3 analogue, we were unable to obtain the single 1S,2S diastereomer that would be expected to
project its C1-H toward the iron cofactor appropriately for H• abstraction, but we did verify by
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 10 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
19F-NMR analysis that the pure 1R,2S compound (1f) – expected to direct the chlorine toward the
cofactor – is not a substrate for wild-type HppE (Figure 5, top; Figure S17B-C). Moreover, we
found (also by 19F-NMR) that the racemic anti compound (rac-1g, consisting of a mixture of 1S,2S-
1g and 1R,2R-1g) could be converted by HppE and its F182A variant to a mixture of the 2-ketone
(4g), cis-epoxide (2g) and trans-epoxide (3g) products (Figure 5, bottom). Presumably, 1R,2R-1g
is, by analogy to the reaction of (R)-2-HPP,23 dehydrogenated to the 2-ketone (4g), and 1S,2S-1g
is successfully cyclized to the mixture of epoxides (Figure 5B, second from bottom). As for the
native and 3-Fn-substituted substrates (1, 1a-c), we found that the F182A variant makes less of the
cis epoxide (2g) from the rac-1g than does the wild-type enzyme (Figure 5B, bottom; Figure S17E-
F).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
We did succeed in synthesizing the desired single diastereomer of the 1-fluoro analogue,
(1R,2S)-1-F-HPP (1h; note that the substituent priority order changes in the 1-F analog relative to
the 1-Cl compound, Figure 6A). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS; Figure 6B) of 1h (top), its
reactions with wild-type HppE (second from top) or the trans-epoxide-favoring F182A variant
(third from top), and the synthetic 2-ketone derivative, 4h (bottom), revealed that both HppE
proteins effect a net dehydrogenation (removal of two hydrogens) of the 1-F-substituted analog.
The corresponding 31P-NMR spectra (Figure 6C; Figure S18B-E) reveal a pair of major oxidation
products with 31P resonances at  ~ 2.5 ppm and ~ 3.5 ppm. These resonances are 6-7 ppm upfield
from that of 1h (Figure 6C), similar to the 8-11 ppm shifts seen upon epoxidation of the 3-Fn-
substituted compounds (1, 1a-c). The 31P spectra of both products reveal large geminal hyperfine
19
couplings to F (2JP-F ~ 98 and 102 Hz) – as also seen for 1h and 4h – but neither product-
associated resonance exhibits an obvious geminal coupling to 1H, unlike in 1h and 4h (Figure 6C;
Figure S18C-E). This latter observation implies that one of the two hydrogens removed in the
transformation of 1h to the pair of major products is from C1, as occurs in epoxidation of the other
substrates. The NMR data thus show that HppE can cyclize 1h, despite the expectation that a
hypothetical C1-carbocation intermediate would be severely destabilized by the fluorine
substituent.
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
For each of the four pairs of 3-Fn-substituted (n = 0-3) cis and trans epoxides produced by
HppE from the corresponding 3-Fn-(S)-2-HPP analog, the cis epoxide (2, 2a-c) has the lesser 31P
, and the trans epoxide has the greater 31P . For the cases of 2/3 and 2c/3c, this trend was verified
directly, by characterization of synthetic or commercially available standards, whereas for 2a/3a
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
1
and 2b/3b, the rank order of the vicinal H-1H couplings (3JH-H) in each pair confirmed that the
trend holds throughout the 3-Fn (n = 0-3) series. This trend would imply that the product from 1h
with  ~ 2.5 ppm is the cis epoxide, 2h, and the product with  ~ 3.5 ppm is the trans epoxide, 3h.
The absence of a 1H nucleus on C1 in these products precludes use of the rank order of 3JH-H values
19
for confirmation of the assignment, but the F spectra of the products (Figure 6D-E) provide
further verification. The two major products, tentatively assigned above as 2h and 3h, exhibit 19F
19
resonances at  ~ -137 and ~ -159 ppm, respectively. Blow-ups of their F spectra (Figure 6E)
reveal, in addition to the major doublet splitting from the geminal P nucleus (2JF-P), smaller
31
hyperfine couplings on each line of the doublet arising from 1H nuclei on C2 (3JF-H, doublet) and
C3 (4JF-H, quartet). Deeper (derivative) analysis of the spectra revealed that the resonance with 19F
 ~ -137 ppm has the larger of the two vicinal F-H couplings (3JF-H 4.2 Hz compared to 1.5 Hz),
suggesting that the associated product is the cis epoxide, 2h. With this assignment confirmed, it
can be seen that, as in epoxidation of 1, 1a-c, and 1g, wild-type HppE markedly favors the cis
product (2h:3h ~ 93:7), whereas the F182variant markedly favors the trans product (2h:3h ~ 10:90)
(Figure 6C-D; Figure S18). The consistent, pronounced shift to C1 retention and cis-epoxide
formation caused by the F182A substitution implies that all of the analogs undergo epoxidation by
a common mechanism. The combined results thus decisively favor a radicaloid ring-closure
mechanism (Scheme 1B, red) – as supported by the computational analysis of Shaik and co-
workers9 – over the previously proposed polar coupling via the C1 carbocation (Scheme 1B,
orange and green).
Antimicrobial potencies of the (halogenated) cis and trans epoxide products. The
accumulated sets of substrate analogues and HppE variants afforded a panel of cis- and trans-
epoxide compounds, which we evaluated for antimicrobial potency in comparison to the clinical
11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 12 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
antibiotic, Fos. We measured the areas of the zones of growth inhibition created by spotting
reaction solutions on a lawn of Escherichia coli K12.2, 28 We first established a linear correlation
between the area of inhibition and the concentration of commercial Fos within the range of 0.15
mM < [Fos] < 2 mM (Figure S19). We then validated use of raw reaction solutions for testing
potency by confirming that the solution with wild-type HppE, 1.5 mM of the native substrate, and
excess H2O2 (producing ~ 1.42 mM 2 and 0.08 mM 3) gave a zone of inhibition indistinguishable
from that of 1.5 mM of pure commerical Fos. We next measured inhibition areas created by
reactions that were, by choice of substrate (each at 1.5 mM with excess H2O2) and HppE variant,
enriched in either 3 or the cis- or trans-epoxide product of 3-F- (2a or 3a), 3-F2- (2b or 3b), or 3-
F3-(S)-2-HPP (2c or 3c) (Figure S20, 21). The reaction solution enriched in trans epoxide, 3
[F182A variant with native (S)-2-HPP], was ~ 50% less potent than that enriched in 2, and
reactions enriched in any of the C3-fluorinated epoxides (either cis or trans) were at least 50% less
potent than those enriched in 3. The uniformly deleterious impact of C3 fluorination suggests that
increased electrophilicity of the epoxide warhead does not, at least in this bioassay, potentiate its
activity. The fluorinated compounds may have diminished affinity for MurA or may suffer from
increased decomposition (e.g., by hydrolysis) prior to reaching their target. More importantly, the
implication of the diminished potency of the trans epoxide, 3, is that the steric enforcement of C1
inversion and cis-epoxide formation by HppE is important for its biological function. For the case
of this enzyme, it appears that necessity was indeed the mother of invention.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Possible implications for mechanism of H•-abstraction step. The mechanism deduced here for
the HppE reaction – H• abstraction, radical inversion, and radicaloid ring closure – shares aspects
of that previously elucidated for the first of two reactions catalyzed by the iron(II)- and 2-
oxoglutarate-dependent (Fe/2OG) oxygenase, carbapenem synthase (CarC). CarC promotes the
stereoinversion (epimerization) of C5 of (3S,5S)-carbapenam-3-carboxylate, yielding the 3S,5R
compound, before desaturating between C2 and C3 to generate its (5R)-carbapenem final product.
In the stereoinversion, H• is removed from C5 by a ferryl intermediate, and Tyr165 then donates
H• to the opposite side of the bicyclic system.35 Calculations have suggested that the structure of
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
the intermediate itself drives the facile inversion of the initial 5S radical to the 5R radical in a
butterfly-like motion of the bicyclic system that is predicted to have a relatively low activation
barrier (~ 24 kJ/mol) and a negative free-energy change (~ – 7 kJ/mol). It was proposed that this
motion, which would be expected to move C5 away from the iron cofactor, is crucial to the
avoidance of C5 hydroxylation via the generally facile coupling of the initial 5S radical to the
Fe(III)-coordinated hydroxide ligand, a step known generally as “oxygen rebound.” One could
envisage also for the possibility of H• abstraction by a ferryl complex in HppE (Scheme S1A) that
the demonstrated inversion of the C1 radical – driven in this case by steric contacts with the
enzyme – might be essential for avoidance of oxygen rebound. However, for the cases of the HppE
variant and (S)-2-HPP analogs that yield ring closure with predominant retention of C1, one might
then expect oxygen rebound to compete with cyclization, resulting in formation of some of the C1-
hydroxylated product. It is tempting to interpret the fact that we did not, for any combination of
variant enzyme and substrate analog, observe such competition from C1 hydroxylation as evidence
against H• abstraction by a ferryl complex (Scheme S1A) and in favor of the proposal of Shaik
and co-workers that H• abstraction is effected a by a hydrogen-bonded hydroxyl radical (Scheme
S1B), a mechanism that could, by virtue of greater separation of the cofactor and C1 radical,
potentially preclude oxygen rebound. Definitive resolution of this key mechanistic issue awaits
experimental determination of the oxidation state of the cofactor (+IV or +III) immediately before
H• abstraction.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
CONCLUSIONS
A remarkable robustness of HppE to both sterically unconservative amino-acid substitutions
in its active site and stereo-electronically perturbing modifications to its substrate has enabled
elucidation of the mechanism of its C–O-coupling step. The results experimentally validate two of
the principal conclusions from the recent computational study of Shaik and co-workers, who
posited that facile inversion of the C1 radical and radicaloid C–O-coupling produce the cis epoxide
of the antibiotic.9 Moreover, the experimental results both identify specific enzyme-
substrate/product contacts that drive C1-radical inversion and show that perturbation of these
13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 14 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
contacts allows the outcome to be tuned from vastly predominant C1-inversion and cis-epoxide
formation to vastly predominant C1-retention and trans-epoxide formation. The conclusion of a
radicaloid coupling step is likely to apply also to reactions of other non-heme-iron enzymes that
form C–O and other carbon-heteroatom bonds. For example, the Fe/2OG enzyme, hyoscyamine
6-hydroxylase (H6H), installs the epoxide of the plant-derived anesthetic drug, scopolamine, by
sequential hydroxylation and cyclization steps.36 Because the radicaloid nature of the epoxidation
step would almost certainly require iron coordination of the C6 oxygen that undergoes coupling to
C7 in the second step, the analysis predicts that coordination of the heteroatom to the ferryl
complex, its Fe(III)–OH successor, or both, might be observable in H6H and, more generally, in
other, analogous enzymatic carbon-heteroatom-coupling reactions.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
Scheme 1. (A) Predominant transformation of (S)-2-HPP by HppE and (B) possible mechanisms
5
6
for this outcome.
7
8
9
A
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
O
OH
FeII-HppE
2-
2-
H2O2
2 H2O
H3C
PO3
PO3
H3C
H
H
(S)-2-HPP (1)
cis-Fos (2)
FeII
HO
O
O
H3C
O
P
H
B
O
HS
intermediary
radical
SN2
coupling
HO
FeIII
FeIII
HO
FeII
O
H3C
H
O
P
H2O2
radical
inversion
radical
coupling
O
O
P
O
O
P
2
O
H3C
O
O
H3C
H
O
O
H
H2O
O
HS
HS
HR
HS
polar
coupling
electron
transfer
direct radical
coupling
HO
FeII
O
O
P
O
polar
coupling
H3C
H
O
O
H3C
H
PO3
2-
H
HS
trans-Fos (3)
15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 16 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
A
E142
B
E142
L120
L120
6
H138
H138
7
8
9
L144
3.8Å
L144
6.7Å
5.0Å
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
4.5Å
6.2Å
C1
5.4Å
L193
L193
C1
cis-Fos
4.0Å
4.7Å
(S)-2-HPP
H180
H180
F182
F182
Figure 1. Structural models of the HppE substrate and product complexes from x-ray
crystallographic studies. (A) Model of the HppE•FeII•(S)-2-HPP complex (PDB ID: 1ZZ8). (B)
Model of the HppE•ZnII•fosfomycin complex (PDB ID: 2BNN).
16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
H
H
2O
2O2
OH
A
B
O
2
2-
O
3
P
2-
O3
H
H
PO3
3C
H
3C
H
H
3C
HppE
2-
H
H
H
P
O3
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Commercial std. (2)
Synthetic std. (rac-3)
Isolated products (2 and 3) from the HppE reaction
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1H (ppm)
C
Commercial std. (2)
D
2JH-P = 19.4 Hz
3JH-H = 5.1 Hz
2JP-H = 18.7 Hz
//
Synthetic std. (rac-3)
2JH-P = 22.2 Hz
3JH-H = 2.7 Hz
2JP-H = 21.7 Hz
//
Isolated products (2 and 3) from the HppE reaction
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.6
10.5
10.0
5.5
5.0
1H (ppm)
31P (ppm)
Figure 2. Re-examination of the stereochemical selectivity in Fos production by HppE. (A) Cis-
Fos (2) and trans-Fos (3) products of ring-closure with inversion and retention, respectively, of C1
configuration. The atoms are color-coded to facilitate interpretation of the 1H-NMR spectra in the
1
lower panels. (B) H NMR spectra of commercial cis-Fos (top), synthetic standard trans-Fos
(middle), and the isolated epoxide products from the HppE reaction (bottom). (C) Blow-up of the
peaks arising from the C1-1H showing that the vicinal coupling constant, JH-H, to the C2-1H in
3
cis-Fos (3JH-H = ~ 5.1 Hz) is almost twice that in trans-Fos (3JH-H = ~ 2.7 Hz). For ease of
comparison, minor adjustments in peak positions (≤ 0.08 ppm) have been made to account for vari-
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 18 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ations in  with differences in pH, counter ion composition, and concentration. (D) Corresponding
31P-NMR spectra measured in 100 mM NaOD in D2O. The dd feature (2JP-H = ~ 21.7, 3JP-H = ~ 5.1
Hz) at ~ 10.4 ppm is from trans-Fos, and the dd feature (2JP-H = ~ 18.7, 3JP-H = ~ 5.3 Hz) at ~ 9.9
9
3-
ppm is from cis-Fos. The singlet at ~ 4.8 ppm is from the internal standard (PO4 ).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Figure 3. Stereochemical courses of the transformations of stereospecifically 1-d1 labeled 2-HPP
31
diasteromers by wild-type (wt) HppE. (A) Summary of reaction outcomes and (B) P NMR
analysis of the products in reactions of wt HppE with the (1S,2S)-1-d1-2-HPP (1d) and (1R,2S)-1-
d1-2-HPP (1e). Each trans:cis ratio is the mean value from three 31P-NMR assays, and the standard
deviations given in parentheses are errors on each percentage value [i.e., 5:95 (0.2) implies a
trans:cis ratio in the range of 4.8:95.2 – 5.2:94.8].
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 20 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
H
H
2O2
2O
A
O
OH
O
2-
H
P
O3
FnH
3-nC
FnH
3-nC
2-
FnH
PO3
3-nC
HppE
2-
H
P
O3
H
H
H
n = 0 (1)
3
2
n = 1 (1a)
n = 2 (1b)
n = 3 (1c)
3a
3b
3c
2a
2b
2c
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
2c
B
C
3c
2
9.8 : 90.2 (0.8)
43.6 : 56.4 (0.3)
77.2 : 22.8 (0.2)
89.8 : 10.2 (0.9)
100.0 : 0.0 (0.0)
3
L193F/L144F
L193F
wt
0.0 : 100.0 (0.0)
5.3 : 94.7 (0.3)
18.1 : 81.9 (1.7)
87.2 : 12.8 (0.6)
L193F
wt
L120F
F182A
L120F
F182A
10.4
10.2
10.0
9.8
6.5
6.0
5.5
31P (ppm)
31P (ppm)
D
E
2a
2b
3a
3b
0.0 : 100.0 (0.0)
6.6 : 93.4 (0.3)
12.1 : 87.9 (0.4)
96.9 : 3.1 (0.2)
0.0 : 100.0 (0.0)
7.1 : 92.9 (0.5)
18.0 : 82.0 (0.4)
97.4 : 2.6 (0.4)
L193F
wt
L193F
wt
L120F
F182A
L120F
F182A
9.2
8.8
31P (ppm)
8.4
7.8
7.4
31P (ppm)
7.0
Figure 4. Analysis by 31P-NMR spectroscopy of the product profiles in reactions of HppE and its
variants with the 3-Fn-substituted (n = 0-3) (S)-2-HPP substrates (1, 1a-c). (A) Reaction scheme
and explanation of product nomenclature. (B-E) 31P-NMR spectra from the reactions with the n =
0-3 compounds and the HppE variants indicated to the right of each spectrum. The trans:cis ratios
shown at the center of the spectra were determined by comparison of the integrated intensities of
the more down-field dd features of the trans-epoxide products and the more upfield dd features of
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
the cis-epoxide compounds. Each value is the mean of three trials, with standard deviations shown
in parentheses. Details of the analytical procedures are provided in the Supporting Information.
For compounds with at least one fluorine (C-E), trans:cis ratios were also calculated by comparison
of the intensities of the appropriate features in the 19F-NMR spectra and were found to be
quantitatively consistent.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 22 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(1R,2S)-1f - enzyme + Internal std.
A
B
OH
H
1f
2-
PO3
Cl
wt
F
3C
no reaction
(1R,2S)-1f + wt + Internal std.
H2O2
(1R,2S)-1f
9
rac-1g - enzyme + Internal std.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
1g
OH
Cl
O
O
2-
O
2-
Cl
PO3
PO3
Cl
2-
F
3C
F
rac-1g + wt + Internal std.
3C
PO3
F3C
wt
F3C
2-
H
PO3
H
H
H
Cl
(1S,2S)-1g
2g
3g
3g
4g
4g
H2O2
H2O
2g
3g
4g
rac-1g + F182A + Internal std.
2g
2g
/
/
3g = 29/71 (0.9)a
3g = 0/100 (0.0)a
OH
2-
PO3
F
3C
F182A
H
Cl
(1R,2R)-1g
-65
-70
-75
19F (ppm)
-80
Figure 5. Summary of outcomes and 19F NMR analysis in the reactions of the wild-type (wt) and
F182A HppE proteins with (1R,2S)-1-Cl-3-F3-HPP [(1R,2S)-1f] and rac-1-Cl-3-F3-2-HPP
[(1S,2S)- and (1R,2R)-1g] compounds. (A) Reaction schemes depicting C1 pro-R hydrogen
abstraction and formation of the cis and trans epoxides (2g and 3g, respectively) by the two
proteins. aThe 2g:3g ratio given is the mean value from three 19F -NMR assays with the standard
19
deviations given in parentheses. (B) F-NMR spectra of the reactions of (1R,2S)-1f with HppE
(second from top), rac-1g with HppE and the F182A variant (second from bottom and bottom).
Assignment of structures of products 2g, 3g, and 4g refers 19F NMR analyses of cis-, trans-F3-Fos
and 3-F3-2-keto compounds (2c, 3c and 4c). Single peaks of 4g (second from bottom) and 4c (table
S11) at ~-81-~-87 ppm correspond to C2 dehydrogenation. The doublets at -64.7 and -66.6 ppm
correspond to cis- and trans-1-Cl-3-F3-Fos (2g and 3g), respectively, in analogy with the doublets
at -64.2, -74.1 ppm of cis and trans-3-F3-Fos (2c and 3c). The single peak at -78.7 is from the
internal standard sodium triflate.
22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3.0x104
A
B
157.0078
O
2-
PO3
wt
H
3C
(
2h
)
3h
1h
H
F
OH
F
154.9918
154.9921
154.9921
2.0x104
1.0x104
0.0x100
H2O2
H
2-
PO3
2h/3h = 93/7 (1.0)a,b
H3C
1h + wt
1h + F182A
4h
2O
H
O
F
H
3C
1h
(
3h
)
2h
F182A
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
2-
H
PO3
2h/3h = 10/90 (0.3)a,b
155
156
m/z (Da)
157
C
D
E
-137.0
Internal std. + 1h - enzyme
-137.1
-137.2
Internal std. + 1h - enzyme
1h
1h
//
Internal std. + 1h + wt
Internal std. + 1h + wt
2JP-F = 98.0 Hz
2h
2h
derivative
//
Internal std. + 1h + F182A
Internal std. + 1h + F182A
2JF-P = 98.5 Hz
3JF-H = 4.2 Hz
4JF-H = 2.1 Hz
2JP-F = 102.1 Hz
3h
3h
2h
3h
//
Internal std. + synthetic std.
(
4h
)
Internal std. + 4h
2JP-F = 58.1 Hz
2JP-H = 14.4 Hz
2JF-P = 102.7 Hz
3JF-H = 1.5 Hz
4JF-H = 1.5 Hz
O
2-
PO3
H3C
(4h)
4h
F
H
//
23.0
9.0
7.0
5.0
31P (ppm)
3.0
1.0
-135
-165
-195
19F (ppm)
-159.2
-159.3
19F (ppm)
-159.4
Figure 6. Summary of stereochemistry, mass-spectrometric and NMR-spectroscopic
characterization of the products generated by wild-type HppE and its F182A variant from (1R,2S)-
1-F-HPP (1h). (A) Reaction schemes depicting C1 pro-R hydrogen abstraction and formation of
the cis and trans epoxides (2h and 3h, respectively) by the two proteins. aEach cis:trans ratio given
31
b
31
is the mean value from three P -NMR assays; Values given were determined by F-NMR
analysis, and the standard deviations given in parentheses are errors associated with each
percentage value. (B) HRMS of synthetic 1h (top), the reactions of 1h with wild-type HppE
(second from top) and its F182A variant (third from top), and synthetic 1-fluoro-2-oxo-
propylphosphonate, 4h (bottom), another possible product of HppE-mediated oxidation (from C2
dehydrogenation) of 1h. (C) 31P NMR spectra showing production of primarily cis epoxide, 2h, in
the reaction of the wild-type enzyme (second from top) and trans epoxide, 3h, in the reaction of
the F182A variant (third from top). The flanking spectra are – as in panel B – of the 1h (top) and
4h (bottom) standards. Note that both 1h and 4h give rise to doublet-of-doublets (dd) spectra as a
31
19
1
result of large geminal couplings of the P nucleus to the F (larger coupling) and H (smaller
23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 24 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
coupling) nuclei that are also bonded to C1, whereas both 2h and 3h give rise to doublet (d)
features lacking the smaller geminal coupling to the C1 1H, which is removed in their formation
from 1h. The multiplet at 22.9 ppm is from the internal standard, sodium propylphosphonate. (D)
19F-NMR spectra of the same samples as in panel B. The triplet at -217 ppm is from the internal
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
19
standard, sodium fluoroacetate. (E) Blow-up of the F-NMR spectra of 2h and 3h, showing
geminal couplings (2JF-P) consistent with those seen in the 31P-NMR spectra.
24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 25 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
5
6
7
8
Supporting Information. Synthetic methods and spectroscopic data on compounds; procedures for
preparation of wild-type and variant HppE enzymes; procedures and data for quantifying enzyme
reaction outcomes; Tables assigning NMR resonances of synthetic and enzyme products; methods
and data to determine antimicrobial potencies of Fos analogs; NMR spectra of all compounds. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Athours
*szz59@psu.edu
*ckrebs@psu.edu
*jmb21@psu.edu
ORCID
Shengbin Zhou: 0000-0003-1127-1829
Juan Pan: 0000-0003-3307-958X
Katherine M. Davis: 0000-0002-0258-8907
Irene Schaperdoth: 0000-0001-5240-3475
Bo Wang: 0000-0002-0381-3686
Amie K. Boal: 0000-0002-1234-8472
Carsten Krebs: 0000-0002-3302-7053
J. Martin Bollinger, Jr.: 0000-0003-0751-8585
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM113106 to J.M.B. and C.K.,
GM127079 to C.K., GM119707 to A.K.B., and 1K99GM129460-01 to K.M.D.) We thank Dr.
Tapas K. Mal and Dr. Carlos N. Pacheco for helpful discussions of the NMR experiments.
25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 26 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
REFERENCES
7
8
9
1. Gehringer, M.; Laufer, S. A., Emerging and re-emerging warheads for targeted covalent
inhibitors: applications in medicinal chemistry and chemical biology. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62 (12),
5673-5724.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
2. Hendlin, D.; Stapley, E. O.; Jackson, M.; Wallick, H.; Miller, A. K.; Wolf, F. J.; Miller, T.
W.; Chaiet, L.; Kahan, F. M.; Foltz, E. L.; Woodruff, H. B., Phosphonomycin, a new antibiotic
produced by strains of Streptomyces. Science 1969, 166 (3901), 122-123.
3. Marquardt, J. L.; Brown, E. D.; Lane, W. S.; Haley, T. M.; Ichikawa, Y.; Wong, C. H.; Walsh,
C. T., Kinetics, stoichiometry, and identification of the reactive thiolate in the inactivation of UDP-
GlcNAc enolpyruvoyl transferase by the antibiotic fosfomycin. Biochemistry 1994, 33 (35),
10646-10651.
4. Kim, D. H.; Lees, W. J.; Kempsell, K. E.; Lane, W. S.; Duncan, K.; Walsh, C. T.,
Characterization of a Cys115 to Asp substitution in the Escherichia coli cell wall biosynthetic
enzyme UDP-GlcNAc enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA) that confers resistance to inactivation by
the antibiotic fosfomycin. Biochemistry 1996, 35 (15), 4923-4928.
5. Thibodeaux, C. J.; Chang, W.-c.; Liu, H. W., Enzymatic chemistry of cyclopropane, epoxide,
and aziridine biosynthesis. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112 (3), 1681-1709.
6. Liu, P. H.; Murakami, K.; Seki, T.; He, X. M.; Yeung, S. M.; Kuzuyama, T.; Seto, H.; Liu, H.
W., Protein purification and function assignment of the epoxidase catalyzing the formation of
fosfomycin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123 (19), 4619-4620.
7. Wang, C.; Chang, W.-c.; Guo, Y.; Huang, H.; Peck, S. C.; Pandelia, M.-E.; Lin, G. M.; Liu,
H. W.; Krebs, C.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr., Evidence that the fosfomycin-producing epoxidase, HppE,
Is a non-heme-iron peroxidase. Science 2013, 342 (6161), 991-995.
8. Krebs, C.; Galonic Fujimori, D.; Walsh, C. T.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr., Non-heme Fe(IV)-oxo
intermediates. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40 (7), 484-92.
9. Wang, B. J.; Lu, J. R.; Dubey, K. D.; Dong, G.; Lai, W. Z.; Shaik, S., How do enzymes utilize
26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
reactive OH radicals? Lessons from nonheme HppE and Fenton systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016,
138 (27), 8489-8496.
7
8
9
10. Chang, W.-c.; Mansoorabadi, S. O.; Liu, H. W., Reaction of HppE with substrate analogues:
evidence for carbon-phosphorus bond cleavage by a carbocation rearrangement. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2013, 135 (22), 8153-8156.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
11. Roach, P. L.; Clifton, I. J.; Hensgens, C. M. H.; Shibata, N.; Schofield, C. J.; Hajdu, J.;
Baldwin, J. E., Structure of isopenicillin N synthase complexed with substrate and the mechanism
of penicillin formation. Nature 1997, 387 (6635), 827-830.
12. Burzlaff, N. I.; Rutledge, P. J.; Clifton, I. J.; Hensgens, C. M. H.; Pickford, M.; Adlington, R.
M.; Roach, P. L.; Baldwin, J. E., The reaction cycle of isopenicillin N synthase observed by X-ray
diffraction. Nature 1999, 401 (6754), 721-724.
13. Tamanaha, E.; Zhang, B.; Guo, Y.; Chang, W.-c.; Barr, E. W.; Xing, G.; St Clair, J.; Ye, S.
F.; Neese, F.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr.; Krebs, C., Spectroscopic evidence for the two C-H-cleaving
intermediates of Aspergillus nidulans isopenicillin N synthase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (28),
8862-8874.
14. Galonic, D. P.; Barr, E. W.; Walsh, C. T.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr.; Krebs, C., Two interconverting
Fe(IV) intermediates in aliphatic chlorination by the halogenase CytC3. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3
(2), 113-116.
15. Matthews, M. L.; Neumann, C. S.; Miles, L. A.; Grove, T. L.; Booker, S. J.; Krebs, C.; Walsh,
C. T.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr., Substrate positioning controls the partition between halogenation and
hydroxylation in the aliphatic halogenase, SyrB2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106 (42),
17723-17728.
16. Wong, S. D.; Srnec, M.; Matthews, M. L.; Liu, L. V.; Kwak, Y.; Park, K.; Bell, C. B., 3rd;
Alp, E. E.; Zhao, J.; Yoda, Y.; Kitao, S.; Seto, M.; Krebs, C.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr.; Solomon, E. I.,
Elucidation of the Fe(IV)=O intermediate in the catalytic cycle of the halogenase SyrB2. Nature
2013, 499 (7458), 320-3.
17. Mehmood, R.; Qi, H. W.; Steeves, A. H.; Kulik, H. J., The protein's role in substrate
27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 28 of 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
positioning and reactivity for biosynthetic enzyme complexes: the case of SyrB2/SyrB1. Acs
Catalysis 2019, 9 (6), 4930-4943.
7
8
9
18. McCarthy, E. L.; Booker, S. J., Destruction and reformation of an iron-sulfur cluster during
catalysis by lipoyl synthase. Science 2017, 358 (6361), 373-377.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
19. Tao, L. Z.; Stich, T. A.; Fugate, C. J.; Jarrett, J. T.; Britt, R. D., EPR-derived structure of a
paramagnetic intermediate generated by biotin synthase BioB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (40),
12947-12963.
20. Pangia, T. M.; Davies, C. G.; Prendergast, J. R.; Gordon, J. B.; Siegler, M. A.; Jameson, G.
N. L.; Goldberg, D. P., Observation of radical rebound in a mononuclear nonheme iron model
complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (12), 4191-4194.
21. Christensen, B. G.; Leanza, W. J.; Beattie, T. R.; Patchett, A. A.; Arison, B. H.; Ormond, R.
E.; Kuehl, F. A.; Alberssc.G; Jardetzky, O., Phosphonomycin: structure and synthesis. Science
1969, 166 (3901), 123-125.
22. Chang, W.-c.; Dey, M.; Liu, P. H.; Mansoorabadi, S. O.; Moon, S. J.; Zhao, Z. B. K.; Drennan,
C. L.; Liu, H. W., Mechanistic studies of an unprecedented enzyme-catalysed 1,2-phosphono-
migration reaction. Nature 2013, 496 (7443), 114-118.
23. Zhao, Z.; Liu, P.; Murakami, K.; Kuzuyama, T.; Seto, H.; Liu, H. W., Mechanistic studies of
HPP epoxidase: configuration of the substrate governs its enzymatic fate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2002, 41 (23), 4529-4532.
24. Woschek, A.; Wuggenig, F.; Peti, W.; Hammerschmidt, F., On the transformation of (S)-2-
hydroxypropyl-phosphonic acid into fosfomycin in Streptomyces fradiae: a unique method of
epoxide ring formation. ChemBioChem 2002, 3 (9), 829-835.
25. Higgins, L. J.; Yan, F.; Liu, P. H.; Liu, H. W.; Drennan, C. L., Structural insight into antibiotic
fosfomycin biosynthesis by a mononuclear iron enzyme. Nature 2005, 437 (7060), 838-844.
26. Yun, D.; Dey, M.; Higgins, L. J.; Yan, F.; Liu, H. W.; Drennan, C. L., Structural basis of
regiospecificity of a mononuclear iron enzyme in antibiotic fosfomycin biosynthesis. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133 (29), 11262-11269.
28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 29 of 31
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
27. Peric Simov, B.; Wuggenig, F.; Lämmerhofer, M.; Lindner, W.; Zarbl, E.; Hammerschmidt,
F., Indirect evidence for the biosynthesis of (1S,2S)-1,2-epoxypropylphosphonic acid as a co-
metabolite of fosfomycin [(1R,2S)-1,2-epoxypropylphosphonic acid] by Streptomyces fradiae.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2002 (7), 1139-1142.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
28. McLuskey, K.; Cameron, S.; Hammerschmidt, F.; Hunter, W. N., Structure and reactivity of
hydroxypropylphosphonic acid epoxidase in fosfomycin biosynthesis by a cation- and flavin-
dependent mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102 (40), 14221-14226.
29. Katagiri, T.; Yamaji, S.; Handa, M.; Irie, M.; Uneyama, K., Diastereoselectivity controlled by
electrostatic repulsion between the negative charge on a trifluoromethyl group and that on aromatic
rings. Chem. Commun. 2001, (20), 2054-2055.
30. Blanksby, S. J.; Ellison, G. B., Bond dissociation energies of organic molecules. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2003, 36 (4), 255-263.
31. Kim, C. K.; Lee, K. A.; Bae, S. Y.; Han, I. S.; Kim, C. K., Theoretical studies on the hydride
ion affinities of carbocations. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2004, 25 (2), 311-313.
32. Schlosser, M., Parametrization of substituents: effects of fluorine and other heteroatoms on
OH, NH, and CH acidities. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37 (11), 1497-1513.
33. Washabaugh, M. W.; Stivers, J. T.; Hickey, K. A., C(α)-proton transfer from 2-(1-
hydroxybenzyl)oxythiamin: the unit brønsted slope overestimates the amount of bond formation
to the base catalyst in the transition state. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116 (16), 7094-7097.
34. Lankin, D. C.; Chandrakumar, N. S.; Rao, S. N.; Spangler, D. P.; Snyder, J. P., Protonated 3-
fluoropiperidines: an unusual fluoro directing effect and a test for quantitative theories of solvation.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115 (8), 3356-3357.
35. Chang, W.-c.; Guo, Y.; Wang, C.; Butch, S. E.; Rosenzweig, A. C.; Boal, A. K.; Krebs, C.;
Bollinger, J. M., Jr., Mechanism of the C5 stereoinversion reaction in the biosynthesis of
carbapenem antibiotics. Science 2014, 343 (6175), 1140-1144.
36. Matsuda, J.; Okabe, S.; Hashimoto, T.; Yamada, Y., Molecular-cloning of hyoscyamine 6β-
hydroxylase, a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase, from cultured roots of Hyoscyamus-niger.
29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment