Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Table 2: Investigation of suboptimal substrates and comparison of
protecting groups.
rich nature provides the opportunity to exploit point chir-
ality.[22] We therefore wanted to explore whether the spiro-
cyclization–desilylation process is stereoretentive. We ration-
alized that the stereochemical integrity of both the a- and b-
positions could be simultaneously probed by monitoring the
diastereomeric ratio (dr) of an a,b-disubstituted substrate
throughout the synthesis. To this end, syn-3q and anti-3q were
submitted to the spirocyclization reaction to provide syn-4q
and anti-4q, respectively. Pleasingly, no change in dr was
observed,[23] showing that the stereochemical integrity of the
substrate is fully maintained during the spirocyclization–
desilylation process.
Entry
1
SiR3
4: % Yield[a]
7: % Yield[b]
TMS: 3h
TMS: 3j
TES: 3h’
TES: 3j’
35
44
17
80
44
2
3
4
Ph
Ph
42
5[b]
In addition to the formation of trifluoroacetyl-protected
azetidines, the synthesis of sulfonamide products 4aa, 4bb
and 4cc was achieved by employing triflic anhydride as the
activator, albeit with decreased yields due to competing
nucleophilic substitution at the bridgehead carbon of the
ABB by the triflate anion (see Table 1, entry 4). Despite the
weak nucleophilic character of the triflate anion, addition is
nevertheless observed, presumably due to the increased
electrophilicity of the ABB bridgehead carbon upon activa-
tion with triflic anhydride, resulting in a less selective
reaction.[16] Further extension of the carbon chain gave
access to oxa-azaspiro[3.5]nonane 4r in 90% yield. However,
cyclization to form the corresponding 7-membered ring
product 4s occurred in only trace amounts. Finally, the
scope was broadened to include aryl alcohol-based nucleo-
philes. TBS-protected phenol (4t), 3-pyridinol (4u’) and
naphthol (4v) substrates were all transformed into the
spirocyclic products in good to excellent yields. Notably, in
the case of 4u, the ketone adjacent to the pyridine was prone
to nucleophilic addition and subsequent side reactions (see
Supporting Information for details). However, this decom-
position could be prevented by employing the analogous
TMS-protected ABB-carbinol, which was readily deprotected
upon work-up to give alcohol 4u’.
During our investigations into the substrate scope, we
were intrigued by the significant disparity in yields between
seemingly similar substrates. For example, cyclopropyl prod-
uct 4h was formed in only 35% yield, compared to a 94%
yield for isopropyl product 4i. A comparably low yield of
42% was also obtained for phenyl substituted product 4j.
Further investigation into the diminished yields for the
spirocyclization of both cyclopropyl ABB-ketone 3h and
phenyl ABB-ketone 3j revealed that trifluoroacetates 7h and
7j were the major side products formed in these reactions
(Table 2, entries 1 and 2). Interestingly, repeating these
reactions with a bulkier silyl group (TES) almost entirely
suppressed product formation and further increased the
amount of side product detected (entries 3 and 4). This
drastic effect, and formation of the corresponding side
products, was not observed in other secondary silyl ether
substrates, where the more hindered silyl protecting group
simply resulted in a slight decrease in yield (see Supporting
Information for details).
trace
[a] Isolated yield. [b] Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis using
dibromomethane as an internal standard.
Scheme 3. Proposed mechanism for the spirocyclization–desilylation
reaction.
ophilic substitution. Intramolecular attack of the silyl ether
then ensues to construct the challenging spirocenter and give
oxonium intermediate II, which is driven by the relief of the
highly strained central bond of the ABB. Alternatively,
intermolecular substitution at the bridgehead carbon by
a trifluoroacetate anion to generate 6 (Pathway a) is also
possible and can be detected for substrates where a tethered
nucleophile is absent. We initially considered the possibility of
6 as an intermediate in the formation of 4, however,
subsequent attempts to promote this pathway by increasing
the relative concentration of the trifluoroacetate anion with
the addition of tetrabutylammonium trifluoroacetate resulted
in the generation of 6 whilst simultaneously inhibiting
formation of 4, therefore suggesting this species is not an
intermediate on the reaction pathway (see Supporting
Information for details). After spirocyclization, cationic
intermediate II can then undergo a trifluoroacetate-promoted
desilylation to access spirocyclic product 4 (Pathway b). This
proposed cation-induced intramolecular cyclization–desilyla-
tion mechanism of silyl ethers has been previously established
for related cyclization reactions.[24]
To rationalize these observations, we propose the follow-
ing mechanism (Scheme 3). Firstly, trifluoroacyl ammonium
intermediate I is formed upon acylation of the ABB nitrogen
of 3, which activates the bridgehead carbon towards nucle-
If a cation-stabilizing substituent, such as phenyl or
cyclopropyl, is present a to the oxonium in II, then competing
C O bond cleavage occurs to form carbocation III,[25] which is
À
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 11824 –11829 ꢀ 2021 The Authors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH www.angewandte.org 11827