.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 2: Cobalt-catalyzed direct C4-selective alkylation of pyridines with
Catalytic amounts of Fe, Ni, Mn, and Cu salts in the presence
of LiBEt3H (20 mol%) resulted in unsatisfactory yields
(entries 1–4). In contrast, CoBr2 (1 mol%) promoted the
reaction of pyridine 1a with styrene 2a, affording alkylation
product 3aa in 77% yield and with a branched/linear
selectivity of > 20:1, but low C4/C2 selectivity (1.8:1;
entry 5). We also screened other hydride sources (entries 6–
8), but LiBEt3H was crucial for obtaining product 3aa in good
yield. Control experiments using either CoBr2 alone (entry 9)
or LiBEt3H alone (entry 10) gave poor results. Thus, the
combination of CoBr2 and LiBEt3H was important for
obtaining high reactivity. To improve C4/C2 selectivity, we
investigated ligands such as phosphines and N-heterocyclic
carbenes, but observed no improvement (entries 11 and 12).
On the other hand, the addition of Et3B effectively improved
C4/C2 selectivity, and the alkylation adduct was obtained in
95% yield, and with branched/linear=> 20:1 and C4/C2 =
7.0:1 selectivities (entry 13). Other cobalt salts, such as CoCl2
and [Co(acac)2] (acac = acetylacetonate) gave comparable
C4/C2 selectivity (entries 14 and 15), but the reactivity was
slightly lower than with CoBr2. Hexamethylphosphoramide
(HMPA; 30 mol%) in combination with Et3B further
improved the C4/C2 selectivity to > 20:1 (entry 16).[17]
The substrate scope of the C4-selective direct pyridine
alkylation is summarized in Table 2. The reaction of pyridine
and its derivatives 1a–1d with styrene derivatives 2a–2 f
(1.05 equiv) proceeded smoothly when using CoBr2
(1 mol%), LiBEt3H (20–30 mol%), and Et3B (20 mol%).
Good to high branched selectivity (> 20:1–7.4:1) and C4
selectivity (> 20:1 for all entries)[18] were observed for
entries 1–5 and 9–17. Aliphatic 1-alkenes 2g, 2h, and 2i
were also applicable, but the reactivity of 2g–2i was much
lower than that of the styrene derivatives. An increase in the
loading of CoBr2 (6 or 9 mol%) and LiBEt3H (200 or
300 mol%) and the use of excess aliphatic alkenes were
required to promote alkylation. As shown in entries 6–8,
linear products 4ag–4ai (branched/linear= 1: > 20) were
obtained in 58–86% yield with high C4 selectivity
(> 20:1).[19] When using bipyridine 1e, a product doubly
alkylated at the C4 and C4ꢀ positions was obtained in 85%
yield by performing the reaction with styrene (5.0 mol equiv;
entry 18). Notably, the reaction of 3-picoline 1b with styrene
2a proceeded smoothly on a gram scale with as little as
0.025 mol% of CoBr2, which equates to a substrate/catalyst
(s/c) ratio of 4000 (Scheme 2). The high turnover number
(TON; 3440) of the reaction is also noteworthy.
alkenes.[a]
Entry
1
LiBEt3H
[mol%]
2
Yield 3,4 Branched/linear C4/C2/double
[%][b] product ratio[c] product ratio[c]
1[d]
2[d]
3
1a 20
1a 30
1a 30
1a 30
1a 30
1a 200
1a 200
1a 300
1b 20
1b 20
1b 20
1b 20
1c 30
1c 30
1c 30
1c 30
2a 91
2b 87
2c 83
2d 77
2e 60
2g 71
2h 86
2i 58
2a 89
2b 97
2c 84
2 f 87
2a 96
2b 88
2c 86
2 f 81
2a 63
2a 85
3aa
3ab
3ac
3ad
3ae
4ag
4ah
4ai
3ba
3bb
3bc
3bf
3ca
3cb
3cc
3cf
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
7.4:1
>20:1:0.38
>20:1:1.1
>20:1:trace
>20:1:0
>20:1:0
>20:1:0
>20:1:0
>20:1:0
>20:1:trace
>20:1:0
>20:1:0
>20:1:0
>20:1:0
>20:1:0
>20:1:trace
>20:1:0
4
5
6[e]
7[e]
8[f]
9
1:>20
1:>20
1:>20
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17[g] 1d 30
18[h] 1e 30
3da
3ea
>20:1:trace
C4 only
[a] The reaction was run using 1 (0.90 mmol), 2 (1.05 equiv), CoBr2
(1 mol%) and Et3B (20 mol%) in toluene (0.3m) at 708C, unless
otherwise noted. [b] Combined yield of alkylated products based on
1 after purification by silica gel column chromatography. [c] Determined
by 1H NMR analysis of the crude mixture. [d] HMPA (30 mol%) was
added. [e] CoBr2 (6.0 mol%) and excess alkenes (2g: 12 equiv, 2h:
13.5 equiv) were used. [f] CoBr2 (9.0 mol%) and excess 2i (15.2 equiv)
were used. [g] Reaction was run in the absence of Et3B. [h] 5.0 mol equiv
of 2a was used and a product doubly alkylated at the C4 and C4’
positions was obtained.
To obtain preliminary insights into the reaction mecha-
nism, we performed control experiments (Schemes 3–5).
First, to assess the catalyst turnover process, the reaction
was performed starting from a cobalt amide species 5
(a model for III in Scheme 1), which was generated by the
procedure shown in Scheme 3. Pyridine (0.2 equiv) was first
reacted with PhLi (0.2 equiv), and CoBr2 (1 mol%) was
added to the mixture to generate proposed cobalt amide 5. An
active cobalt–hydride species [Co–H] would then be gener-
ated from 5 by b-hydride elimination. With the presumed
cobalt hydride catalyst generated in situ in the absence of
LiBEt3H and Et3B, the alkylation of pyridine indeed pro-
ceeded to give 3aa in 70% yield.[20] The observed C4/C2
Scheme 2. Gram-scale reaction with reduced catalyst loading
(s/c=4000).
selectivity was similar to that in Table 1, entry 5, thus
supporting the intermediacy and regeneration of the cobalt–
hydride species[21] in the actual catalytic cycle of the reactions
in Table 2.
2
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!