J. Xu et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 124 (2014) 416–422
417
water at 2 mg/L (31
l
M) [3]. Nevertheless, copper contamination
tilled water was used throughout all experiments. Thin layer chro-
matography (TLC) was carried out using silica gel 60 F254, and
column chromatography was conducted over silica gel (200–300
mesh), both of which were obtained from the Qingdao Ocean
Chemicals (Qingdao, China). The Cu standard solution, copper in
water (1.0 mol/L HNO3) (GSB 04-1725-2004) was obtained from
Analysis and Testing Center of National Nonferrous Metals and
Electronic Materials (Beijing, China).
and its potential toxic effects on biological systems are still the
challenging problems throughout the world because of copper
wide use for many industrial, agricultural and domestic purposes.
Accordingly, it is very important to monitor copper levels in vari-
ous samples for environment and human health.
Thus far, various efficient and reproducible methods have been
proposed to detect the concentrations of Cu2+ including atomic
absorption spectrometry (AAS) [4], inductively coupled plasma–
atomic emission spectrometry (ICP–AES) [5], inductively coupled
plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) [6], etc. Though these tech-
niques are sensitive, selective, and accurate for Cu2+ assay, they
are usually complicated, time-consuming, and costly. Due to their
advantages of high sensitivity, specificity, and ease of operation, a
large number of fluorescent probes have been reported for the
determination of copper ions so far. However, most of them exhibit
fluorescence emission quenching upon binding Cu2+ owing to the
paramagnetic nature of Cu2+ [7–10]. Fluorescence quenching is
not only unfavourable for a high signal output upon recognition
but also hinders temporal separation of spectrally similar com-
plexes with time-resolved fluorometry [11]. Until now, only a
few probes with a Cu2+ induced fluorescence enhancement have
been proposed [2,12,13]. Thus, searching for Cu2+ probes based
on fluorescence enhancement is still an active field as well as a
challenge for the analytical chemistry research effort.
Rhodamine and its derivatives are excellent fluorophores and
chromophores owing to their very good spectroscopic properties,
such as large molar extinction coefficient, relatively long excitation
and emission wavelengths elongated to visible region, high light
stability, and high fluorescence quantum yield [14]. Rhodamine
derivatives with a spirolactam-ring moiety are non-fluorescent
and colorless. In the presence of a proton or metal cation, they
can be converted to the open-ring forms via a reversible coordina-
tion or an irreversible chemical reaction and give rise to strong
fluorescence emission and a pink color [15]. Thus, the rhodamine
framework is an ideal model to fabricate the turn-on fluorescent
probe. In the past few years, several rhodamine-modified probes
have been developed for various cations such as Cu2+ [16–18],
Hg2+ [19–21], Fe3+ [22–24], Pb2+ [25], Cr3+ [26], Ag+ [27], Zn2+
[28], and Cr5+ [29]. According to the Soft–Hard Acid–Base theory,
the probes attached the recognition moiety with N and O atoms
could display good affinity to Cu2+. Recently, several probes based
on rhodamine and salicylaldehyde derivatives have been widely
used for detecting Cu2+ [30–39]. However, these probes contain
hydrazone group which makes them unstable for the long term
storage neither in the air nor in the solvent [40]. Herein, a Cu2+
fluorescent probe (probe 1) based on the rhodamine hydrazone
derivative has been developed. It exhibits fluorescence enhance-
ment upon the addition of Cu2+ in 50% water/ethanol buffered at
pH 7.10 and its high selectivity for Cu2+ in the presence of many
other metal cations. Furthermore, the proposed probe has been
used for direct measurement of Cu2+ content in river water sam-
ples and imaging of Cu2+ in living cells with satisfying results.
Syntheses
The synthetic route for fluorescence probe 1 was shown in
Scheme 1.
Compound 2 was synthesized according to Xiang’s method [16]
by the reaction of rhodamine B and hydrazine hydrate (85%). Com-
pound 3 was prepared starting from compound 2 and salicylalde-
hyde by the reported literature [16].
Synthesis of compound 1
To a stirred solution of compound 3 (0.50 g, 1 mmol) in anhy-
drous CH2Cl2 (20 mL) cooled to 0 °C was carefully added solid
sodium borohydride (0.19 g, 5 mmol) in portions. The resulting
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h. After reaction,
the reaction mixture was filtrated and the filtrate was evaporated
under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica
gel column chromatography using petroleum ether/CH3COOCH2
CH3 (7:1, V/V) as eluent to afford compound 1 (0.23 g, 40%) as a
white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), d(ppm): 1.16 (t, 12H, NCH2
CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.33 (q, 8H, NCH2CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.86 (d, 2H,
NHCH2, J = 6.8 Hz), 4.22 (t, 1H, NHCH2, J = 6.8 Hz), 6.24 (dd, 2H,
Xanthene-H, J = 8.8 Hz, 2.8 Hz), 6.43 (m, 2H, Xanthene-H), 6.45
(m, 2H, Xanthene-H), 6.68 (m, 1H, Phen-H), 6.81 (d, 1H, Phen-H,
J = 8.0 Hz), 6.85 (dd, 1H, Phen-H, J = 7.4 Hz, 1.6 Hz), 7.10 (m, 1H,
Phen-H), 7.14 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.2 Hz, 1.6 Hz), 7.50 (m, 2H, Ar-
H), 7.95 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.80 (bs, 1H, Phen-OH).
Apparatus
All fluorescence measurements were made on a Hitachi F-4500
Fluorescence Spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan) in 1 cm ꢁ 1 cm quartz
cell. UV–Vis absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu
UV-2450 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan) in 1 cm path
length quartz cuvettes with a volume of 4 mL. 1H NMR was ac-
quired in CDCl3 on Varian INOVA-400 MHz NMR spectrometer
using TMS as an internal standard. The measurements of pH were
carried out on a Mettler-Toledo Delta 320 pH meter (Shanghai, Chi-
na) with a Mettler combination glass electrode (No. 4140230002).
The electrode was calibrated for pH using commercial pH reference
solutions (pH 4.00, pH 6.86 and pH 9.18 standard solutions). Data
processing was performed on an Inter Core i5 computer with soft-
ware of SigmaPlot.
Measurement procedures
A stock solution of 2.0 ꢁ 10ꢂ5 mol/L compound 1 was obtained
by dissolving the requisite amount of 1 in absolute ethanol. A stan-
dard stock solution of 1.0 ꢁ 10ꢂ2 mol/L Cu2+ was prepared by dis-
solving an appropriate amount of copper chloride in water and
adjusting the volume to 100 mL in a volumetric flask. Working
solutions of copper chloride were freshly prepared by serial dilu-
tion of the stock solution with 0.05 M Tris–HCl buffer solution.
The complex solution of Cu2+ and compound 1 was obtained by
mixing 12.5 mL of the stock solution of compound 1 and 2.5 mL
of Cu2+ solution of the different concentrations in a 25 mL volumet-
ric flask. Then the mixture was diluted to 25 mL with Tris–HCl buf-
fer solution. In the solution thus obtained, the concentrations were
Experimental
Reagents
Rhodamine B, hydrazine hydrate (85%), salicylaldehyde, sodium
borohydride and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt
(EDTA-2Na) were obtained from Shanghai Chemical Reagents and
used as received. Before being used, dichloromethane was distilled
at atmospheric pressure from CaH2 and stored over 4 Å molecular
sieves. Other chemicals were of analytical reagent grade and used
without further purification except when specified. Doubly dis-