Organic Letters
Letter
a
Table 1. Representative Results for the Optimization of the Iron-Catalyzed Silylation of Naphthalen-1-yl Diethylcarbamate 1a
b
entry
[Fe]
ligand
solvent
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
base
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Fe(OTf)2
Fe(OTf)2
Fe(OTf)2
Fe(OTf)2
Fe(OTf)2
Fe(OTf)2
Fe(OTf)2
FeBr2
P(t-Bu)3
P(p-MePh)3
XPhos
XPhos
XPhos
XPhos
XPhos
XPhos
XPhos
MeOK
MeOK
MeOK
0
28
36
23
60
28
64
78
t-BuONa
MeONa
MeONa
MeONa
MeONa
MeONa
MeONa
MeONa
toluene
(i-Pr)2O
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
9
10
11
Fe(OAc)2
Fe(OAc)2
93 (89)
0
0
XPhos
a
Reaction conditions (unless otherwise specified): 1a (0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv), silylborane 2a (0.75 mmol, 2.5 equiv), [Fe] (0.015 mmol, 0.05 equiv),
b
1
ligand (0.03 mmol, 0.1 equiv), solvent (1.5 mL), base (1.05 mmol, 3.5 equiv), 120 °C, 15 h. Determined by H NMR using mesitylene as an
internal standard. The isolated yield is shown in parentheses.
catalyzed silylation of vinyliodonium triflate with silylzinc
reagents (Scheme 1).11 Although those achievements have
been made, it should be noted that the synthesis of tetra-
substituted alkenylsilanes remains challenging. Moreover, the
iron-catalyzed formation of C−Si bonds with unreactive C−O
bonds has yet to be achieved, owing to the problematic
oxidative addition step with iron catalysts due to their strong
bond dissociation energy.12 To continue our interest in
transition-metal catalysis,13 herein we describe an example of
the construction of Csp2−Si bonds from phenol and ketone
derivatives through iron-catalyzed C−O bond activation
without Grignard reagents,14 thus providing a facile and
efficient route to the synthesis of tri- and tetra-substituted
alkenylsilanes.
With these considerations in mind, we began to search for
the potential oxygen-based electrophiles for the iron-catalyzed
silylation. Among the oxygen-based electrophiles, aryl
carbamates are rather attractive due to their ease of preparation
and high stability.15 Moreover, the carbamate group has been
widely employed as the directing group to realize regioselective
C−H bond functionalization or electrophilic aromatic
substitution, providing the chance for orthogonal trans-
formations.16 Accordingly, we began our investigations by
subjecting aryl carbamate 1a to silylborane 2a in the presence
of various bases and electron-rich ligands, such as P(t-Bu)3 and
P(Cy)3, but no desired product was observed. (For details, see
investigations, the silylated product 3 was observed in 28%
yield when P(p-MePh)3 was used as a ligand (Table 1, entry
2). Encouraged by these results, other parameters were
evaluated (Table 1, entries 3−5), and the desired product 3
was obtained in a promising 60% yield when sodium
methanolate was used as a base in the presence of XPhos as
the ligand (Table 1, entry 5). Switching the solvent from
toluene to ethers provided the corresponding compound in
moderate yield (Table 1, entries 5−7). After testing other iron
sources, we found that FeBr2 could promote this reaction,
providing 3 in 78% yield. Furthermore, Fe(OAc)2 could
drastically improve the reaction efficiency, delivering 3 in 89%
isolated yield (Table 1, entries 8 and 9; for details, see the
necessity for both an iron catalyst and a ligand, and no desired
product was observed in the absence of an iron catalyst or
XPhos. These results suggest that electron-rich ligand XPhos
plays a crucial role in promoting this reaction. This is probably
because the electron-rich ligand could facilitate the oxidative
addition of an unreactive C−O bond to the iron catalyst.
After the optimal conditions were established, the scope of
this iron-catalyzed silylation reaction was explored. As shown
in Scheme 2, when naphthyl phenol derivatives were used as
substrates, this reaction proceeded well, providing the
corresponding silylated products in good to excellent yield
(3−10, 68−94%). Substrates bearing a strong electron-
donating group afforded the desired products in good yield
(5−7, 68−74%). In addition, the naphthyl carbamates
containing an aryl group on the aromatic ring proceeded
smoothly, and the corresponding products were obtained in
good yield (8−10, 72−89%). Polycyclic aromatic substrates
also showed good reactivity, affording the silylated products in
moderate to good yield (11−14, 66−81%), and the N-
heteroaromatic carbamate could undergo this transformation
as well, producing 15 in a synthetically useful yield. Biphenyl
substrates were demonstrated to be good reaction partners,
resulting in the corresponding products in moderate yield (16
and 17, 57−64%). To our delight, relatively inert monophenyl
substrates also proceeded smoothly, yielding the corresponding
products in moderate to good yield (18−31, 50−81%).
Moreover, the silyl and alkynyl groups were well-tolerated, and
18 was afforded in an excellent yield (81%), providing an
opportunity for the further modification of aryl silanes.
Importantly, this silylation reaction could be extended to
alkenyl carbamates, and the corresponding silylated products
were obtained in moderate to good yield. For a carbamate
group located at the one- or two-position of cyclic styrene
derivatives, the transformation proceeded smoothly (32−48).
Functional groups such as CF3, Cl, F, OBn, carbamate, and 2-
pyridyloxy could be well-tolerated (45, 46, 47, 50, 51, and 52).
It is worth noting that the relatively unreactive alkenyl
carbamates without the π-extended conjugated system could
react well (49−53). Linear carbamate bearing a bulky group
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX