structural modification to the chelation cavity comprising donor
atoms on altered complexation preferences of these substituted
‘amino-ethyl-amido’-rhodamine framework (ESI: Fig. S24–S25,
Table ST2–ST3†). The sum of angles around Ndonor–atom (N4)
to which the substituent is attached infers to its non planar geo-
metry in 2 (346.56°) and 3 (346.54°), while to a lower degree of
pyramidalization in 4 (359.99°) and is consistent with that of the
X-ray diffracted crystallographic structure of 4. The shorter N4–
C31 bond distance in 4 (1.378 Å), in comparison to that in 2
(1.464 Å) and 3 (1.462 Å), suggests that attachment of 4-nitro-
phenyl induces a partial double bond character and restricts the
rotation around it to impose a structural rigidity on 4. Apart from
spatial orientation, the non-bonded distances among the donor
atoms, which constitute the chelation cavity, provide vital infor-
mation towards effective and preferential metal ion coordination
through modulation of the extent of orbital overlap. The non-
bonded Oamido(O2)⋯Namino(N4) and Namido(N3)⋯Namino(N4)
distances, which vary depending upon the nature of the sub-
stituent, are found to be 4.462 Å and 3.822 Å respectively
in 2, 4.491 Å and 3.820 Å respectively in 3, while a larger dis-
tance of 4.557 Å and 4.533 Å respectively is found in 4.
Notes and references
‡Crystal data for 4: C36H39N5O4; Mw = 605.72; needle-shaped; pale-
yellow crystals, triclinic, space group P1, a = 9.225(2) Å, b = 12.144(3)
Å, c = 14.886(4) Å, α = 74.73(1), β = 78.29(2), γ = 83.99(4), U =
1572.9(6)Å3, T = 296(2) K, Z = 2, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.085 mm−1, F (000) =
644, ρcalc = 1.279 mg m−3, 7814 reflection data with 414 parameters,
5517 [I ≥ 2 σ(I)] unique reflections used in calculations. The final R1 =
0.0771, wR2 = 0.2389, S = 1.040.
ˉ
1 For selected reviews, see: (a) J. S. Kim and D. T. Quang, Chem. Rev.,
2007, 107, 3780; (b) V. Amendola, L. Fabbrizzi, F. Forti, M. Licchelli,
C. Mangano, P. Pallavicini, A. Poggi, D. Sacchi and A. Taglieti, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 2006, 250, 273; (c) J. F. Callan, A. P. de Silva and
D. C. Magri, Tetrahedron, 2005, 61, 8551.
2 (a) J. J. R. F. D. Silva and R. P. J. Williams, The Biological Chemistry of
Elements: The Inorganic Chemistry of Life. Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 2nd edn, 2001; (b) Heavy Metals in the Environment, ed.
B. Sarkar, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 2002; (c) D. Beyersmann,
in Metals and Their Compounds in the Environment, ed. E. Merian,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1990.
3 (a) M. A. Lynes, Y. J. Kang, S. L. Sensi, G. A. Pedrizet and
L. E. Hightower, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 2007, 1113, 159; (b) Clinical
Environmental Health and Toxic Exposure, ed. J. B. Sullivan and
G. R. Kriger, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadephia, 2nd edn,
2001.
4 (a) M. Beija, C. A. M. Afonso and J. M. G. Martinho, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2009, 38, 2410; (b) J. F. Jhang and J. S. Kim, Anal. Sci., 2009, 25, 1271;
(c) H. N. Kim, M. H. Lee, H. J. Kim, J. S. Kim and J. Yoon, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2008, 37, 1465; (d) X. Zhang, Y. Xiao and X. Xian, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8025; (e) S. Ando and K. Koide, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2011, 133, 2556.
A
smaller cavity dimension could accommodate only a
smaller cation, hence, 2 preferentially binds to Fe(III) ions,
which has a comparatively smaller ionic radius. The larger non-
bonded distances, the electron and charge densities over
donor atoms, and the structural rigidity of 4 suggests that Hg(II)
ions favorably fits into its chelation-cavity and therefore it
exhibits Hg(II)-selective signalling responses. The preliminary
optimized geometries of these probes, which are presumed to
follow a pre-organizational approach prior to complexation,
establish their preferential coordination pattern among various
metal ions.
In summary, the substituted aminoethyl-rhodamine based
probe has been demonstrated here to switch its selectivity from
Fe(III) to Hg(II) ion in a dual order. First, the p-cyanobenzyl-
attached probe 2, which exhibits Fe(III) selective fluorogenic and
chromogenic signal amplification in MeCN through complexa-
tion-induced rhodamine delactonization, alters its selectivity to
Hg(II) ions in MeCN–H2O medium. Second, the Fe(III) selective
dual signalling responses of 2 in MeCN switches its selectivity
to Hg(II) ions when the electron density over the distal Namino
donor drifts away upon attachment of a p-nitrophenyl-group
as in 4. Similar methodological investigations of structural
modifications might lead, in principle, to the design of dual
mode signalling probes for selective detection of other metal
ions. Further, the mixed aqueous–organic medium has shown
here to promote Hg(II) selectivity in these probes as reflected
by their signalling responses and other metal ions failing to
bind under similar conditions; observations infer a competition
between metal–ligand interaction and hydration of those
metal ions, however, the mechanistic approach for understanding
this process properly in rhodamine based signalling probes
still remains elusive. We are presently working along this
direction.
5 (a) M. Kruppa and B. Konig, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 3520;
(b) P. K. Bharadwaj, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 51, 251.
6 (a) P. James and K. Raoul, Analyst, 2005, 130, 528; (b) J. B. Nielands,
Biol. Met., 1991, 4, 1.
7 For Hg(II): (a) W. F. Fitzgerald, C. H. Lamborg and
C. R. Hammerschmidt, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 641; (b) W. F. Fitzgerald,
D. R. Engstrom, R. P. Mason and E. A. Nater, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
1998, 32, 1; (c) A. Renzoni, F. Zino and E. Franchi, Environ. Res., 1998,
77, 68; (d) O. Malm, Environ. Res., 1998, 77, 73; (e) P. Grandjean,
P. Weihe, R. F. White and F. Debes, Environ. Res., 1998, 77, 165;
(f) T. W. Clarkson, Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci., 1997, 34, 369;
(g) M. Harada, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 1995, 25, 1.
8 For Fe(III): (a) D. Galaris, V. Skiada and A. Barbouti, Cancer Lett., 2008,
266, 21; (b) S. Swaminathan, V. A. Fonseca, M. G. Alam and S. V. Shah,
Diabetes Care, 2007, 30, 1926; (c) E. D. Weinberg, Eur. J. Cancer.,
1996, 5, 19; (d) B. Halliwell, J. Neurochem., 1992, 59, 1609.
9 Few recent examples: (a) M. Kumar, N. Kumar, V. Bhalla, H. Singh,
P. R. Sharma and T. Kaur, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 1422; (b) W. Lin, X. Cao,
Y. Ding, L. Yuan and L. Long, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3529;
(c) W. Shi, S. Sun, X. Li and H. Ma, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 1206;
(d) J. Hu, C. Li and S. Liu, Langmuir, 2010, 26, 724; W. Lin, X. Cao,
Y. Ding, L. Yuan and L. Long, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3529
(e) M. Suresh, S. Mishra, S. K. Mishra, E. Suresh, A. K. Mandal,
A. Shrivastava and A. Das, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 2740.
10 Few recent reports: (a) Z.-Q. Hu, X.-M. Wang, Y.-C. Feng, L. Ding,
M. Li and C.-S. Lin, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 1622; (b) J. Li, Q. Hu,
X. Yu, Y. Zeng, C. Cao, X. Liu, J. Guo and Z. Pan, J. Fluoresc., 2011,
21, 2005; (c) S. Wang, X. Meng and M. Zhu, Tetrahedron Lett., 2011,
52, 2840.
11 L.-F. Zhang, J.-L. Zhao, X. Zheng, L. Mu, X.-K. Jiang, M. Deng,
J.-X. Zhang and G. Wei, Sens. Actuators, B, 2011, 160, 662.
12 Z.-Q. Hu, C.-S. Lin, X.-M. Wang, L. Ding, C.-L. Cui, S.-F. Liu and
H. Y. Lu, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3765.
13 F.-J. Hu, J. Su, Y.-Q. Sun, C.-X. Yin, H.-B. Tong and Z.-X. Nie, Dyes
Pigm., 2010, 86, 50.
14 L. Tang, F. Li, M. Liu and R. Nandhakumar, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A,
2011, 78, 1168.
15 (a) X. Zhang, Y. Shiraishi and T. Hirai, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 5039;
(b) J. H. Soh, K. M. K. Swamy, S. K. Kim, S. Kim, S.-H. Lee and
J. Yoon, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48, 5966.
16 (a) C. Kaewtong, B. Wanno, Y. Uppa, N. Morakot, B. Pulpoka and
T. Tuntulani, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 12578; (b) M. H. Lee, H. J. Kim,
S. Yoon, N. Park and J. S. Kim, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 213; (c) M. H. Lee,
The authors wish to thank the Council of Scientific and
Industrial Research, New Delhi for the financial support under
CSIR-EMPOWER scheme (CSIR-IMMT-OLP-021) for this
work and UGC, New Delhi for a senior research fellowship to
B. Biswal.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 2733–2738 | 2737