Kekule singlet biradical molecules always encounter the
´
difficulty in how their spin structures can be elucidated,
because all p-electrons are covalently paired to form the singlet
ground state. Intrinsically, they are inactive for an ESR
measurement that is the most powerful method for elucidating
the spin structure. Our study presented herein concerns the
investigation of unpaired electrons in a Kekule molecule by
´
examining a covalent bonding interaction between molecules
in a molecular aggregate. A covalent bonding interaction
between molecules would be a good criterion to identify singlet
biradical character for Kekule molecules.
´
This work was supported in part by the Grants-in-Aid for
Scientific Research on Innovative Areas ‘‘Reaction Integration.’’
(No. 2105) and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
(No. 19550039) from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
Fig. 3 Optical conductivity of 3b with the light polarized along the c-axis
(solid line), and the absorption spectrum of 3a in CH2Cl2 (dotted line).
Notes and references
1 (a) E. D. Bergmann and B. Pullman, Aromaticity, Pseudo-aromaticity,
and Anti-aromaticity, Academic Press, New York, 1971; (b) P. J.
Garratt, Aromaticity, Wiley, New York, 1986; (c) V. I. Minkin, M. N.
Glukhovtsev and B. Y. Simkin, Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity:
Electronic and Structural Aspects, Wiley, New York, 1994.
2 (a) P. v. R. Schleyer, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 1115 and articles therein;
(b) P. Lazzeretti, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2004, 6, 217–223.
3 (a) T. Kubo, A. Shimizu, M. Sakamoto, M. Uruichi, K. Yakushi,
M. Nakano, D. Shiomi, K. Sato, T. Takui, Y. Morita and
K. Nakasuji, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 6564–6568;
(b) T. Kubo, A. Shimizu, M. Uruichi, K. Yakushi, M. Nakano,
D. Shiomi, K. Sato, T. Takui, Y. Morita and K. Nakasuji, Org.
Lett., 2007, 9, 81–84; (c) A. Shimizu, M. Uruichi, K. Yakushi,
H. Matsuzaki, H. Okamoto, M. Nakano, Y. Hirao, K. Matsumoto,
H. Kurata and T. Kubo, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48,
5482–5486; (d) A. Shimizu, T. Kubo, M. Uruichi, K. Yakushi,
M. Nakano, D. Shiomi, K. Sato, T. Takui, Y. Hirao,
K. Matsumoto, H. Kurata, Y. Morita and K. Nakasuji, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 14421–14428.
Fig. 4 Schematic drawing of the 1D stack of 3b. Phenyl groups are
omitted for clarity. Red half-arrows represent magnetic spins. Blue
and orange dotted lines represent the intra- and inter-molecular
covalent bonding interactions, respectively.
moment for the lowest-energy band of 3b, we carefully investi-
gated the intensities of the band by rotating polarized light in
steps of 301 on the (0 1 0) surface. The peak had a maximum
intensity at the polarization direction parallel to the c-axis, and
was gradually depressed by rotating the polarization direction,
and finally, disappeared when the polarization direction was
perpendicular to the c-axis (Fig. S3, ESIy).
If a covalent bonding interaction operates only within a
molecule or between molecules, then the direction of transition
moment should be parallel (along the blue dotted line in
Fig. 4) or perpendicular (along the orange dotted line in
Fig. 4) to the molecule, respectively. In the case of the well-
balanced 1D stack of 1b, the transition moment for the lowest-
energy band is directed along the line connecting between the
centers of gravity of the molecule. This indirectly proves that
intra- and inter-molecular covalent bonding interactions are
comparable, being supported with theoretical calculations by
Huang and Kertesz.12 On the other hand, the transition
moment in the 1D stack of 3b tilts to the perpendicular
direction (the orange dotted line direction) with respect to the
line connecting between the centers of gravity of the molecule.
This finding experimentally demonstrates that a covalent bonding
interaction in the 1D stack of 3b is substantially stronger between
molecules compared to within a molecule.
4 The synthetic procedures for 4a and 4b are described in ESIy.
5 Crystal data for compound 3a: T = 150(2) K, monoclinic, space
group P21/n (No. 14), a = 16.1189(8), b = 9.4946(5), c =
21.3361(12) A, b = 100.876(2)1, V = 3206.7(3) A3, Z = 2,
R1 (wR2) = 0.0698 (0.2289) for 397 parameters and 3758 indepen-
dent reflections, GOF = 0.988. CCDC 871896. Crystal data for
%
compound 3b: T = 200(2) K, triclinic, space group P1 (No. 2),
a = 10.152(2), b = 11.5617(18), c = 11.940(2) A, a = 90.925(5),
b = 96.852(7), g = 108.851(6)1, V = 1314.6(4) A3, Z = 1,
R1 (wR2) = 0.0673 (0.2018) for 380 parameters and 4281 indepen-
dent reflections, GOF = 1.185. CCDC 871897.
6 D. Dohnert and J. Koutecky´ , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 1789–1796.
¨
7 (a) M. N. Glukhovtsev, R. D. Bach and S. Laiter, J. Mol. Struct.:
THEOCHEM, 1997, 417, 123–129; (b) S. W. Slayden and
J. F. Liebman, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 1541–1566.
8 The p-bonding energy is 270 kJ molꢁ1, which is estimated from the
rotational barrier in ethylene. See, J. E. Douglas, B. S. Rabinovitch
and F. D. Looney, J. Chem. Phys., 1955, 23, 315–323.
9 Nucleus-independent chemical shifts (NICS(1)) of the six-
membered ring(s) in the linkers negatively increase in order of
the size of the linkers; +0.314 for 1, ꢁ5.609 for 2, and ꢁ6.881
(central) and ꢁ9.686 (both ends) for 3, as shown in Fig. S4, ESIy. For
the NICS, see, Z. Chen, C. S. Wannere, C. Corminboeuf, R. Puchta
and P. v. R. Schleyer, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 3842–3888.
10 A broken symmetry method was applied to evaluation of spin
densities and total energy for the singlet biradical states. See,
(a) L. Noodleman, J. Chem. Phys., 1981, 74, 5737–5743;
(b) K. Yamaguchi, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1975, 33, 330–335.
In conclusion, anthracene-linked bisphenalenyl Kekule
´
molecules (3a and 3b) are endowed with very significant singlet
biradical character by virtue of high aromatic stabilization
energy of anthracene. 3b forms a 1D stack with a superimposed
phenalenyl overlap in the solid state, and in the 1D stack,
unpaired electrons, which appear in a biradical contributor in
the resonance forms, covalently interact within a molecule and
between molecules. Polarized reflection measurements revealed
that the covalent bonding interaction largely operates between
molecules rather than within a molecule.
11 The DES–T values were deduced from the exchange coupling
parameter in the DFT framework by using the equation defined
by Yamaguchi. See, K. Yamaguchi, T. Tsunekawa, Y. Toyoda and
T. Fueno, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1988, 143, 371–376.
12 J. Huang and M. Kertesz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 1634–1643.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 5629–5631 5631