interaction environment within the cages, the Ce-based
coordination polyhedra worked as efficient selective chemo-
sensors for special natural saccharides. Accordingly, changing
the topology and the arrangement of hydrogen binding sites in
the confined space of host, the selectivity toward other target
guests could be expected.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
foundation of China (21171029 and 20923006).
Notes and references
1 (a) B. Ernst, G. W. Hart and P. Sinay, Carbohydrates in Chemistry
¨
and Biology, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000; (b) A. P. Davis and
T. D. James, in Functional Synthetic Receptors, ed. T. Schrader and
A. D. Hamilton, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2005,
pp. 45ꢁ109.
2 (a) T. K. Dam and C. F. Brewer, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 387–429;
(b) M. Mazik, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 935–956.
3 (a) T. K. Lindhorst, Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and
Biochemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000; (b) A. Varki,
R. Cummings, J. Esko, H. Freeze, G. Hart and J. Marth, in
Essentials of Glycobiology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,
Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1999.
4 (a) O. Francesconi, A. Ienco, G. Moneti, C. Nativi and S. Roelens,
guez-
ndez,
Chem. Commun., 2007, 831–833; (c) M. Mazik and M. Kuschel,
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2008, 1517–1526; (d) T. Ishi-i, M. A.
Mateos-Timoneda, P. Timmerman, M. Crego-Calama, D. N.
Reinhoudt and S. Shinkai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42,
2300–2305.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 6693–6696; (b) D. Rodrı
´
Lucena, J. M. Benito, C. O. Mellet and J. M. G. Ferna
´
Fig. 4 Molecular structure of the Ce-TBAS tetrahedral cage. Hydrogen
atoms and solvent molecules are omitted for clarity. The metal, oxygen,
nitrogen and carbon atoms are represented by green, red, blue, and
grey, respectively. Selective bond distance in average (A): Ce–N 2.66,
Ce–O(amide) 2.41, Ce–O(hydroxyl) 2.20, C–N(coordinated amide)
1.32, C–O(coordinated amide) 1.25, C–N(free amide) 1.33, C–O(free
amide), 1.25.
5 (a) R. D. Hubbard, S. R. Horner and B. L. Miller, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2001, 123, 5810; (b) O. Rusin, K. Lang and V. Kral,
´
Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 655; (c) M. Mazik and A. Konig, J. Org.
¨
Chem., 2006, 71, 7854; (d) J. L. Hou, X. B. Shao, G. J. Chen,
Y. X. Zhou, X. K. Jiang and Z. T. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004,
126, 12386–12387.
6 (a) D. B. Walker, G. Joshi and A. P. Davis, Cell. Mol. Life Sci.,
2009, 66, 3177–3191; (b) Jack K. Clegg, Feng Li, Katrina
A. Jolliffe, George V. Meehan and Leonard F. Lindy, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 6042–6044.
7 (a) Y. Ferrand, M. P. Crump and A. P. Davis, Science, 2007, 318,
619–622; (b) T. J. Ryan, G. Lecollinet, T. Velasco and A. P. Davis,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99, 4863–4866.
8 (a) M. D. Ward, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4487–4499;
(b) B. H. Northrop, Y.-R. Zheng, K.-W. Chi and P. J. Stang,
Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 1554–1563; (c) L. Cronin, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 3576–3578; (d) C. Schmuck, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 5830–5832.
NaOAc gave the compound Ce-TBAS (65%). Single crystal
X-ray structure analysis (ESIw) revealed the formation of
Ce4(H2TBAS)4 tetrahedron in the solid state (see Fig. 4).
The tetrahedron is comprised of four vertical metal centers
and four deprotonated ligands. Each cerium ion is chelated by
three tridentate chelating groups from three different ligands to
form a ternary coronary trigonal prism coordination geometry
with a pseudo-C3 symmetry. The ligands are positioned
individually on the four triangle faces of the tetrahedron
defined by four metal ions. The Ceꢀ ꢀ ꢀCe separation is
ca. 21.0 A and the inner volume of the tetrahedron is about
1000 A3.
9 (a) E. Barea, J. A. R. Navarro, J. M. Salas, M. Quiro,
M. Willermann and B. Lippert, Chem.–Eur. J., 2003, 9,
4414–4414; (b) S. Tashiro, M. Kobayashi and M. Fujita, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 9280–9281; (c) C. J. Hastings, D. Fiedler,
R. G. Bergman and K. N. Raymond, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
10977–10983.
10 (a) Abe, Y. Chida, H. Kurokawa and M. Inouye, J. Org. Chem.,
2011, 76, 3366–3371; (b) N. P. Barwell and A. P. Davis, J. Org.
Chem., 2011, 76, 6548–6557; (c) Y. Q. Chen, X. Z. Wang,
X.-B. Shao, J. L. Hou, X. Z. Chen, X. K. Jiang and Z. T. Li,
Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 10253–10256.
11 (a) F. A. Quiocho, Pure Appl. Chem., 1989, 61, 1293–1306;
(b) N. K. Vyas, M. N. Vyas and F. A. Quiocho, Science, 1988,
242, 1290–1295.
12 (a) C. He, Z. Lin, Z. He, C. Duan, C. Xu, Z. Wang and
C. Yan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 877–881; (b) Y. Liu,
X. Wu, C. He, Y. Jiao and C. Duan, Chem. Commun., 2009,
7554–7556.
The ESI-MS spectrum of Ce-TBAS exhibited an intense peak
at m/z = 1451.50, which was assigned to [(Ce4IV(TBRS)4-
(CH3CN)3-7H]3ꢁ species, revealing the formation of M4L4
specie in the solution. For the experimental spectra of
Ce-TBAS in the presence of sucrose, the exact comparison
of the peak at m/z = 1565.84 with the simulation on the basis
of natural isotopic abundance revealed the presence of com-
plexation species [(Ce-TBRS)-3H * (sucrose)ꢀ(CH3CN)3]3ꢁ
.
When Ce-TBAS (20 mM) was excited at 340 nm, it exhibited
a broad emission band at 435 nm in a DMF/acetonitrile
solution. The addition of sucrose (5 mM) caused a significant
luminescence enhancement (1.3 fold). The addition of other
mono- and disaccharides did not cause any obvious spectro-
scopic changes, indicating the selectivity of Ce-TBAS towards
sucrose over other disaccharides.
13 L. Zhao, S. Y. Qu, C. He, R. Zhang and C. Y. Duan, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 9387–9389.
14 K. A. Connors, Binding Constants, John Wiley, New York,
1987.
In summary, with the tunability of the topology and size of
these polyhedrons, as well as the position of the weak
c
6024 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 6022–6024
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012