4010
P. Ramesh, H. M. Meshram / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 4008–4011
R.; Fragoso-Serrano, M.; Cerda-Garcia-Rojas, C. M. K. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 47;
Kumar, K. S.; Reddy, C. S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 2647.
7. Marco, J. A.; Carda, M.; Murga, J.; Falomir, E. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 2929.
8. Kikuchi, H.; Sasaki, K.; Sekiya, J.; Maeda, Y.; Amagai, A.; Kubohara, Y.; Ohsima,
Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 3203.
9. (a) Agrawal, V. K.; Singh, J.; Mishra, K. C.; Khadikar, P. V.; Jaliwala, Y. A. ARKIVOC
2006, ii, 162; Hagen, S. E.; Domagala, J. M.; Gajda, C.; Lovdahl, M.; Tait, B. D.;
Wise, E.; Holler, T.; Hupe, D.; Nouhan, C.; Urumov, A.; Zeikus, G.; Zeikus, E.;
Lunney, E. A.; Pavlovsky, A.; Gracheck, S. J.; Saunders, J. M.; Vander, R. S.;
Brodfuehrer, J. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2319; (c) Hagen, S. E.; Vara-Prasad, J. V.
N.; Tait, B. D. Adv. Med. Chem. 2000, 5, 159; (d) Aristoff, P. A. Drugs Future 1998,
23, 995; (e) Romines, K. R.; Chrusciel, R. A. Curr. Med. Chem. 1995, 2, 825.
10. (a) Chan, K. M.; Rajab, N. F.; Ishak, M. H. A.; Ali, A. M.; Yusoff, K.; Din, L. B.;
Inayat-Hussain, S. H. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2006, 159, 129; (b) Inayat-Hussain, S.
H.; Annuar, B. O.; Din, L. B.; Ali, A. M.; Ross, D. Toxicol. in Vitro. 2003, 17, 433; (c)
Inayat-Hussain, S. H.; Annuar, B. O.; Din, L. B.; Taniguchi, N. Toxicol. Lett. 2002,
131, 153.
7
is readily accessible from tri-O-isopropylidene-D-(+)-mani-
tol.19,16c The hydroxyl group of compound 7 was protected with
Ms-Cl in the presence of Et3N/CH2Cl2 followed by treatment with
K2CO3/MeOH to give epoxide 8 in 82% yield. The epoxide 8 was
regioselectively opened with (Me)3S+Iꢀ, n-BuLi, THF, ꢀ10 °C and
the resulting secondary allylic alcohol 9 was obtained in 76%
yield.20 The secondary allylic hydroxyl group in 9 was protected
with tert-butyldiphenylsilyl chloride (TBDPS-Cl) and imidazole/
DMAP to afford the silyl ether 10 in 92% yield. The 1,2-O-isopropyl-
idene group of compound 10 was selectively deprotected by using
CuCl2ꢁ2H2O in CH3CN to afford diol 4 in 99% yield (with some start-
ing material).21 Diol 4 on monotosylation (TsCl/Bu2SnO/Et3N/
CH2Cl2) provided 11 with 84% yields. The tosylated compound 11
followed by treatment with LiAlH4 provided detosylated and desi-
lylated olefin diol 12 in good yield.22 Completion of the fragment
synthesis required deprotection of acetonide 12 and acetylation
of the four secondary alcohols. This was most conveniently
achieved as a one-flask reaction in CH2Cl2 by addition of TFA/
CH2Cl2/0 °C to rt stirred for 12 h and subsequently the addition of
Et3N/DMAP and acetic acid anhydride to afford tetracetate 2 in
62% yield. Finally coupling of both the fragments, that is, tetraace-
tate fragment 2 and the vinyl lactone fragment 3 was achieved via
an olefin cross-metathesis reaction by using Grubb’s second gener-
ation (G-II) catalyst23 to give (ꢀ)-anamarine (1) in 62% yield
(Scheme 3). Synthetic (ꢀ)-anamarine (1) exhibited identical spec-
tral data24 (IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and Mass) to that of the natural
product.13–15
11. For further literature related to this important biological property, see, for
example: (a) Huang, Z. W. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 1059; (b) Blatt, N. B.; Glick, G. D.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 1371.
12. See, for example: (a) Koizumi, F.; Ishiguro, H.; Ando, K.; Kondo, H.; Yoshida, M.;
Matsuda, Y.; Nakanishi, S. J. Antibiot. 2003, 56, 603; (b) Richetti, A.; Cavallaro,
A.; Ainis, T.; Fimiani, V. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2003, 25, 441; (c)
Larsen, A. K.; Escargueil, A. E.; Skladanowski, A. Pharmacol. Ther. 2003, 99, 167;
(d) Lewy, D. S.; Gauss, C. M.; Soenen, D. R.; Boger, D. L. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005,
2002, 9; Raoelison, G. E.; Terreaux, C.; Queiroz, E. F.; Zsila, F.; Simonyi, M.;
Antus, S.; Randriantsoa, A.; Hostettmann, K. Helv. Chim. Acta. 2001, 84, 3470;
(f) Nagashima, H.; Nakamura K.; Goto, T Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001,
287, 829; (g) Stampwala, S. S.; Bunge, R. H.; Hurley, T. R.; Willmer, N. E.;
Brankiewicz, A. J.; Steinman, C. E.; Smitka, T. A.; French, J. C. J. Antibiot. 1983, 36,
1601.
13. Valverde, S.; Hernandez, A.; Herradon, B.; Rabanal, R. M.; Martin-Lomas, M.
Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 3499.
14. Lorenz, K.; Lichtenthaler, F. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 47.
15. Prasad, K. R.; Penchalaiah, K. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 6889.
16. (a) Meshram, H. M.; Kumar, D. A.; Goud, P. R. Helv. Chemi. Acta. 2010, 93, 1422;
(b) Reddy, B. C.; Meshram, H. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 4020; (c) Ramesh,
P.; Meshram, H. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 2443.
17. Ramesh, P.; Reddy, B. C.; Meshram, H. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012. http://
from 1,3-dithane to give epoxide in 67% yield. The epoxide was opened with
(Me)3S+Iꢀ, n-BuLi, THF, ꢀ10 °C and the resulting secondary allylic alcohol on
treatment with p-methoxy benzyl bromide (PMB-Br) in the presence of NaH
gave 5 in 82% yield
In summary, we have achieved the total syntheses of (ꢀ)-ana-
marine from a common precursor simply by changing the se-
quence of carbinol protection and thus allowing the formation of
d-lactone. Key features of the present route to (ꢀ)-anamarine are
the efficient utilization of the C2-symmetry of the starting material
(D-(+)-mannitol), a selective benzoylation, a selective acetonide
deprotection, detosylation, desilylation and a cross metathesis
reaction. The syntheses of related compounds of this family are
underway in our laboratory.
n-BuLi
(Me)3S+I-, n-BuLi
S
OH
S
1,3-dithane
O
O
S
S
THF, -10 °C
Cl
(R)-epichlorohydrin
THF, -40 °C, 67%
1h, 90%
Acknowledgments
S
OPMB
P.R. thanks CSIR for the award of a fellowship and Dr. J. S. Yadav,
Director IICT, for his support and encouragement.
NaH, PMB-Br
S
TBAI, THF, 0° -rt, 82%
5
References and notes
18. Trost, B. M.; Amans, D.; Seganish, W. M.; Chung, C. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 17087.
19. (a) Wiggins, L. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1946, 13; (b) Yadav, V. K.; Agrawal, D. Chem.
Commun. 2007, 5232.
20. Lcaraz, L.; Harnett, J. J.; Mioskowski, C.; Martel, J. P.; Shin, D. S.; Falck, J. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5449.
21. Saravanan, P.; Chandrasekhar, M.; Anand, R. V.; Singh, V. K. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 3091.
22. Nobuyasu, M.; Sakae, A.; Kibayashi, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1199.
23. (a) Sabitha, G.; Fatima, N.; Gopal, P.; Reddy, C. N.; Yadav, J. S.
Tetrahedron:Assymmetry 2009, 20, 184; (b) Sabitha, G.; Fatima, N.; Gopal, P.;
Reddy, C. N.; Yadav, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6298.
24. Spectral data of selected compounds: (S)-6-vinyl-5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one (3):
1. (a) Argoudelis, A. D.; Zieserl, J. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 1966, 18; (b) Laurence,
B. R. Chem. Commun. 1982, 59; (c) Wilkinson, A. L.; Hanefeld, U.; Wilkinson, P.
F.; Staunton, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 9827; Sato, M.; Nakashima, H.;
Keisuke, H.; Hayashi, M.; Honzumi, M.; Taniguchi, T.; Ogasawara, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2833; (d) Hinterding, K.; Singhanat, S.; Oberer, L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8463; (e) Wu, Y.; Shen, X.; Tang, C.-J.; Chen, Z. L.; Hu,
Q.; Shi, W. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 11, 3802; (f) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, P. M. K.; Reddy, P.
V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1037; (g) Chakraborty, T. K.; Tapadar, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2541; (h) Yamashita, Y.; Saito, S.; Ishitani, H.;
Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3793.
2. (a) Stierle, D. B.; Stierle, A. A.; Ganser, B. J. Nat. Prod. 1997, 60, 1207; (b) Ali, A.;
Mackeen, M. M.; Hamid, M.; Aun, Q. B.; Zauyah, Y.; Azimahtol, H. L. P.; Kawazu,
K. Planta Med. 1997, 63, 81; (c) Falomir, E.; Murga, J.; Cardaa, M.; Marco, J. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 539; (d) Chenevert, R.; Courchesne, G.; Caron, D.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 2567.
Yellow liquid;
½
a 2D5
ꢂ
ꢀ94.3 (c 0.1, CHCl3); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz):
d
(ppm) = 2.47–2.42 (m, 2H), 4.98–4.88 (m, 1H), 5.31–5.27 (dd, 1H,
J = 10.76 Hz), 5.43–5.37 (dd, 1H, J = 17.34 Hz), 6.06–5.88 (m, 2H), 6.89–6.83
(m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): d (ppm) = 29.3, 77.7, 117.8, 121.6, 134.8,
144.3, 163.7; EI-MS: m/z 125 (M+H); ESI-HRMS: calcd 147.0429 (M+Na); found
147.0421 (M+Na). (2R,3R,4R,5S)-hept-6-ene-2,3,4,5-tetrayl tetraacetate (2): Light
´
3. (a) Pereda-Miranda, R.; Fragoso-Serrano, M.; Cerda-Garcıa-Rojas, C. M.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 47; (b) Falomir, E.; Murga, J.; Carda, M.; Marco, J. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 539; (c) Falomir, E.; Murga, J.; Ruiz, P.; Carda, M.;
Marco, J. A.; Pereda-Miranda, R.; Fragoso-Serrano, M.; Cerda-Garcıa Rojas, C. M.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5672.
yellow oil; ½a 3D0
ꢂ
+12.4 (c 0.5, CHCl3); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d (ppm) = 1.18
(d, 3H, J = 6.42 Hz), 2.0 (s, 3H), 2.09 (s, 6H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.80 (s, 1H), 4.92 (t, 1H,
J = 6.42 Hz), 5.22 (dd, 1H, J = 6.61, 3.58 Hz), 5.26-5.36 (m, 4H), 5.68-5.80 (m,
1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d (ppm) = 35.11, 40.02, 40.21, 40.29, 40.42,
86.85, 90.16, 91.09, 92.13, 139.70, 150.66, 189.15, 189.25, 189.30, 189.39; IR
(KBr): 2932, 1741, 1223, 1032, 906 cmꢀ1; ESI-MS: m/z 353 [M+Na]; ESI-HRMS:
Calculated for C15H22O8Na: 353.1212. Found: 353.1207. (ꢀ)-Anamarine (1):
4. Coleman, M. T. D.; English, R. B.; Rivett, D. E. A. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 1497.
5. (a) Birch, A. J.; Butler, D. N. J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 4167; (b) Achmad, S. A.; Hyer, T.;
Kjaer, A.; Makmur, L.; Norrestam, R. Acta Chem. Scand. 1987, 41B, 599.
6. (a) Lorenz, F.; Lichtenthaler, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 6437; (b) Diaz-Oltra,
S.; Murga, J.; Falomir, E.; Carda, M.; Marco, J. A. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 2979; (c)
Gao, D.; O’Doherty, G. A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9932; (d) Sabitha, G.; Reddy, C.
N.; Gopal, P.; Yadav, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5736; (e) Pereda-Miranda,
Gummy liquid;
½
a 2D5
ꢂ
ꢀ16.0 (c 0.5, CHCl3); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
d
(ppm) = 1.18 (d, 3H, J = 6.42 Hz), 2.03 (s, 3H), 2.07 (s, 6H), 2.13 (s, 3H), 2.50-