small amounts of the corresponding diastereomers 11 were
isolated (10/11 dr ≈ 5:1; de ≈ 66%). The question then
arises as to whether products of type 11 epimerize under
the reaction conditions. This was examined by heating 11a
with sodium methoxide (10 equiv, THF 60 °C, 3 d), but no
conversion to 10a was observed by TLC. Instead, slow
decomposition of 11a occurred, both of which observations
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Scaffolds of Type B
1
were confirmed by H NMR. These results suggest that
although products of type 11 do not epimerize (to 10),
these intermediates nevertheless decompose at a faster rate,
thereby providing a mechanism for diastereomer enrich-
ment. Since these spirolactams are generally highly crystal-
line and compounds of type 10 are significantly less soluble
in chloroform than the epimers (i.e., 11), chromatography-
free purification should be possible for purposes of scale-
up. Finally, borane reduction of 10a and 10b furnished
scaffolds 12a and 12b in 56% and 44% yield, respectively.
alkenes 17a and 17b, respectively, which underwent ring
closing metathesis to give 18a/b.13 Piperidine formation
was achieved with the ozonolysis/reductive amination
conditions recently published by Dussault,14 which deliv-
ered 19a and 19b in 40% and 39% yield. Chemoselective
amine N-debenzylation and subsequent lactam reduction
completed the desired scaffolds 20a and 20b in 59% and
60% overall yield, respectively.15
Scheme 3. Attempted Extension into Scaffolds of Type B
Spiro-fused oxindoles have previously been approached
using in situ generated R-acylated lactam enolates as
vehicles for nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAr).16
However, our attempt to apply this strategy to the synthe-
sis of scaffolds of type C failed as the less activated
2-fluoro-1-nitrobenzene did not react with enolate 2 at rt
or 60 °C. Consequently, malonate 21 was chosen as an
alternative starting material.
Alkylation of the enolate of 21 with 1,2-cyclic sulfami-
dates 3a and 3c at 60 °C produced 22a and 22c in 72% and
68% yield, respectively (Scheme 5). In the case of 22c,
unidentified byproducts were formed, which were insepar-
able from the product (purity of 22c ≈ 90%), but these
were easily removed at a later stage. The less reactive 1,3-
cyclic sulfamidate 3b (six-membered and less strained) and
An effort to apply this chemistry in the synthesis of
target scaffolds of type B is outlined in Scheme 3 with
alkylated lactams 14a/b as the focus. Initial attempts to
alkylate directly lactam enolates (generated from 1b or 7
and LiHMDS in THF at ꢀ78 °C) with cyclic sulfamidate
3a, at either rt or 60 °C, did not deliver the desired products
14a/b. We also examined the feasibility of direct (in situ)
decarboxylation of the initial alkylation adducts (i.e.,
N-sulfated 13a/b) derived by the carboxyl-directed alkyla-
tion exploited in Schemes 1 and 2. However, this led to
desilylation without decarboxylation, after heating at
60 °C for 5 h.11 In the case of the pyrrolidine variant 13a,
desilylation was followed by lactonization to give 15 in
89% yield. After amine deprotection, in situ lactone-to-
lactam conversion provided 16 (the desilylated variant of 5a)
in 90% yield.
(13) While this reaction worked well with the GrubbsꢀHoveyda
second generation catalyst in DCM, significant amounts of byproducts
resulting from olefin migration were observed when Grubbs’ second
generation catalyst was employed.
(14) Kyasa, S.; Fisher, T.; Dussault, P. Synthesis 2011, 3475–3481.
(15) Dialdehyde derivatives obtained from 17a, 17b, 18a, and 18b (by
either ozonolysis or bishydroxylation and subsequent diol cleavage)
proved to be unstable and were best transformed into the corresponding
piperidines (19) by immediate reductive amination with benzylamine.
Unfortunately, this sequence was capricious, and although a variety of
conditions were explored, yields remained low and the reaction was
plagued by several unidentified byproducts.
(16) (a) Bella, M.; Kobbelgaard, S.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 3670–3671. (b) Cowley, A. R.; Hill, T. J.; Kocis, P.;
Moloney, M. G.; Stevenson, R. D.; Thompson, A. L. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2011, 9, 7042. (c) Sen, S.; Potti, V. R.; Surakanti, R.; Murthy,
Y. L. N.; Pallepogu, R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 358. (d) Kobbelgaard,
S.; Bella, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4980–4987.
(17) Kulkarni, M. G.; Dhondge, A. P.; Chavhan, S. W.; Borhade,
A. S.; Shaikh, Y. B.; Birhade, D. R.; Desai, M. P.; Dhatrak, N. R.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, 876–879.
(18) An attempt to reduce and cyclize lactam 23a under standard
conditions (Pd/C, H2, THF, rt, o/n) was not successful. Judging by
1H NMR no cyclization had occurred, although the nitro group had
been (at least partially) reduced.
The synthesis of scaffolds of type B was achieved using
an alternative solution, albeit still based on lactam enolate
reactivity (Scheme 4).12 Bisallylation of 1b and 7 provided
(11) Refluxing 8a/9a (but following isolation) with p-TsOH H2O in
3
THF for 14 h (as opposed to 5 h) did deliver 14b in 55% yield, but given
the facile formation of 15 from 1b (via 13a) this approach was discarded
in favor of the more general strategy illustrated in Scheme 4.
(12) For a related aproach, also see ref 3e.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C