benzoxazole ring formation promoted by gold species, which
accompanies a turn-on fluorescence change (Scheme 1).5
This strategy was based on our previous reaction-based
approach to sense silver ions, that is, the silver ion-
promoted tandem spirolactam ring opening and oxazo-
line ring formation of an N-iodoethyl-rhodamine B lactam.6
which is nonfluorescent, has been identified by its single
crystal X-ray structure.10 This resolved structure also adds
a valuable piece of evidence for the participation of aryl
rings in the related gold-mediated cyclization reactions.11
If a reaction-based sensing protocol produces nonfluores-
cent side products, as in the case of P1, then the product
distribution would vary depending on the sensing condi-
Scheme 1. Reaction-Based Sensing of Gold Ions with P1
Scheme 2. Competing Reactions in the Gold Sensing Process
with P1 and Crystal Structure of I-1b (ORTEP Drawing with
20% Probability)
Concurrently, others have reported reaction-based
fluorescent probes for gold species based on the unique
alkynophilicity of gold ions.7,8 P1 provided fluorescent
formyloxazole 1, rather than the corresponding proto-
deauration products of the vinylgold intermediate (I-1a);
this unexpected result prompted us to characterize the
reaction intermediates in the gold-mediated cyclization of
N-propargylbenzamides as model compounds.9 We found
that the gold sensing process could also produce two types
of nonfluorescent compounds (Scheme 2), along with
formyloxazole 1 that constitutes 60ꢀ70% of the total
mass. Simple hydration of the acetylenic moiety promoted
by Lewis acidic gold species could compete with the
spirolactam ring-opening process, producing the corre-
sponding fluorescent compounds. Furthermore, an un-
usual ring-closing process is found to compete with the
sensing process: A tricyclic vinylgold(III) species I-1b,
tions, which would undermine the reliability of the quan-
tification data. Therefore, weset out toinvestigate arelated
but different approach that may alleviate the side reactions
observed in the rhodamine-based probe. We envisioned
that we could avoid fluorescence interference from the side
reactions by separating the reaction site from the fluoro-
phore. Herein, as a proof-of-concept we report such a
reaction-based sensing scheme for gold species that cir-
cumvents the aforementioned problems.
Our newly designed probes for gold species are (2-
ethynyl)benzoates of fluorescein, P2 (P2a, P2b) and P3,
where the reactive moiety, (2-ethynyl)benzoate, is sepa-
rated from the fluorophore. For example, activation of the
ethynyl group in P2 by Au3þ would generate the corre-
sponding oxonium intermediate I-2, which would subse-
quently undergo hydrolysis to regenerate the strongly
fluorescent fluorescein 2 (Scheme 3), along with isochro-
men-1-one 4. A related gold-promoted hydrolysis process
was ingeniously applied to a glycosylation reaction by Yao
and co-workers.12 According to the present sensing
(6) Chatterjee, A.; Santra, M.; Won, N.; Kim, S.; Kim, J. K.; Kim,
S. B.; Ahn, K. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2040–2041.
(7) (a) Jou, M. J.; Chen, X.; Swamy, K. M. K.; Kim, H. N.; Kim,
H. J.; Lee, S.-g.; Yoon, J. Chem. Commun. 2009, 7218–7220. (b) Yang,
Y. K.; Lee, S.; Tae, J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5610–5613. (c) Do, J. H.; Kim,
H. N.; Yoon, J.; Kim, J. S.; Kim, H. J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 932–934. (d)
Dong, M.; Wang, Y. W.; Peng, Y. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5310–5313. (e)
Yuan, L.; Lin, W.; Yang, Y.; Song, J. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4703–
4705. (f) Cao, X.; Lin, W.; Ding, Y. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 9066–9069.
(g) Wang, J.; Lin, W.; Yan, L.; Song, J.; Gao, W. Chem. Commun. 2011,
47, 12506–12508. (h) Wang, J. B.; Wu, Q. Q.; Min, Y. Z.; Liu, Y. Z.;
Song, Q. H. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 744–746. (i) Park, J. E.; Choi,
M. G.; Chang, S.-K. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 2880–2884. For a different
class of gold probe, see: Park, J.; Choi, S.; Kim, T.-I.; Kim, Y. Analyst
2012, DOI: 10.1039/c2an35351b.
(8) For recent reviews on the reaction-based approach to fluorescent
probes, see: (a) Jun, M. E.; Roy, B.; Ahn, K. H. Chem. Commun. 2011,
47, 7583–7601. (b) Chen, X.; Pradhan, T.; Wang, F.; Kim, J. S.; Yoon, J.
Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1910–1956.
(9) Egorova, O. A.; Seo, H.; Kim, Y.; Moon, D.; Rhee, Y. M.; Ahn,
K. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 11446–11450.
(10) Crystal data for I-1b (C31H33AuCl3N3O2): M = 782.92, mono-
˚
clinic, space group P21/n; a = 10.9486(11) A, b = 11.7414(12) A, c =
˚
3
˚
˚
24.580(3) A, β = 100.062(2)°, V = 3111.1(5) A ; Z = 4, T = 293(2) K, μ
(λ = 0.71073 A) = 5.019 mmꢀ1, Fcalcd = 1.671 g/cm3, 17 756 reflections
˚
measured, 6348 unique (Rint = 0.0686), R1 = 0.0412, wR2 = 0.1012 (I >
2σ(I)), R1 = 0.0597, wR2 =0.1104 (all data), GOF = 0.999, CCDC No.
747441.
(11) Weber, D.; Tarslli, M. A.; Gagne, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 5733–5736.
(12) Zhu, Y.; Yu, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8329–8332.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 19, 2012
5063