and isothiocyanatestoaffordpyridines, bicyclic pyridones,
and thiopyridones in good yields.9 In particular, dicya-
nides, cyanamides, and halonitriles exhibited exceptionally
high reactivity toward the [Cp*RuCl(cod)] catalyzed cy-
cloaddition with 1,6-diynes leading to bicyclic pyridines
under mild conditions.10
Table 1. Selection of Reaction Conditions for the Crossed
Cyclotrimerization Reaction of 1a with Malononitrile
There are a few precedents in using Grubbs’ first gen-
eration catalysts [Ru]-I to mediate in cyclotrimerization
[2 þ 2 þ 2] reactions for the synthesis of benzene rings.11
Blechert et al. reported for the first time that [Ru]-I is an
efficient catalyst for the intramolecular cyclotrimerization
of alkynes. A cascade metathetic mechanism was postu-
lated in these examples where vinyl carbene complexes
would be the reactive intermediates.12 We have recently
published the use of second generation Grubbs’ catalysts
[Ru]-II and reusable HoveydaꢀGrubbs’ complex [Ru]-III
for the synthesis of fused benzenes.13
yield (%)a
entry solvent temp (°C)
time
cat. (mol %) 1a
2a
We present here the synthesis of a wide variety of highly
functionalized pyridines, obtained for the first time through
an easy experimental procedure based on ruthenium carbene
catalysts.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DCE
rt
48 h
16 h
16 h
16 h
16 h
16 h
16 h
1 h
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
5b
5c
5
5
70
ꢀ
30
78
92
85
ꢀ
DCE
80
DCE
90
ꢀ
acetone
MeCN
EtOAc
dioxane
DCE
75
ꢀ
In order to optimize the reaction, diyne 1a was reacted
with malononitrile under a variety of reaction conditions
(Table 1). The first tests were carried out in DCE with
5 mol % of catalyst [Ru]-IIIand 5 equivalents of nitrile. They
showed the need for heating to achieve total conversion
and reach good yields of product 2a (entries 1 and 2,
Table 1). The reaction was then performed in a sealed tube
which increased the yield to 92% (entry 3). This improve-
ment may be due to an increase in the population of the
reactive conformation of the diyne under higher pressure.
Next we check different solvents under these latter condi-
tions (acetone, MeCN, EtOAc, dioxane, entries 4ꢀ7). We
observed good results except for MeCN, possibly due to
the poor solubility of the catalysts. However, DCE con-
tinued to be the best choice. Entries 8 and 9 show reactions
in which reaction time was reduced to 1 h and 15 min
respectively which allowed the best results (99%, entry 9).
However when reducing the catalyst loading to 2 mol %
the reaction was not complete (entry 10). Next, for com-
parison, we used our best conditions (5 equiv of nitrile, in
90
80
ꢀ
90
85
47
95
99
73
15
80
78
ꢀ
90
ꢀ
90
ꢀ
DCE
90
15 min
ꢀ
10 DCE
11 DCE
12 DCE
13 DCE
14 DCE
90
15 min
27
55
ꢀ
90
15 min
90
15 min
90, rt
90, rt
10 min, 48 hd
10 min, 16 he
18
80
a Reactions were conducted in a sealed tube except entries 1ꢀ2 (entry
2 under reflux), at 66.6 mM concentration of diyne with 5 equiv of nitrile.
b With [Ru]-I as the catalyst. c With [Ru]-II as the catalyst. d Catalyst is
dissolved and heated at 90 °C in a sealed tube for 10 min and then cooled
to rt, and reagents were added and then stirred at rt for 48 h. e Catalyst
and nitrile are dissolved and heated at 90 °C in a sealed tube for 10 min
and then cooled to rt, and diyne was added and then stirred at rt for 16 h.
DCE at 90 °C, sealed tube), using [Ru]-I and [Ru]-II as the
catalysts (entries 11ꢀ12). The first generation Grubbs’
catalyst proceeded with low yield while [Ru]-II gave a good
result slightly below to that achieved with [Ru]-III. The
ability of [Ru]-III to catalyze these cyclotrimerizations
(8) (a) Yamamoto, Y.; Kinpara, K.; Saigoku, T.; Nishiyama, H.;
Itoh, K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 1287–1294. (b) Yamamoto, Y.;
Arakawa, T.; Ogawa, R.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12143–
12160. (c) Yamamoto, Y.; Hata, K.; Arakawa, T.; Itoh, K. Chem.
Commun. 2003, 1290–1291. (d) Hoven, G. B.; Efskind, J.; Romming,
C.; Undheim, K. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2459–2463.
(9) (a) Yamamoto, Y.; Ogawa, R.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 6189–6190. (b) Yamamoto, Y.; Takagishi, H.; Itoh, K. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 2117–2119. (c) Yamamoto, Y.; Kinpara, K.; Saigoku, T.;
Takagishi, H.; Okuda, S.; Nishiyama, H.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 605–613.
(14) General procedure for synthesis of pyridines. Over a solution of
the diyne and the nitrile in 2 mL of 1,2-dichloroethane contained in a
pressure flask, a solution of [Ru]-III in 2 mL of the same solvent was
added. The flask was sealed and introduced in a 90 °C bath, and the
resulting mixture was stirred until the reaction was completed (TLC).
After cooling the flask to rt the reaction mixture was filtered through
celite, the solvent was eliminated under reduced pressure, and the residue
was purified by column chromatography. Preparation of dibenzyl 3-
(cyanomethyl)-1,4-dimethyl-5H-cyclopenta[c]pyridine-6,6(7H)-dicarbox-
ylate, 2a. From 1a (0.100 g, 0.260 mmol), malononitrile (0.085 g, 1.290
mmol) and [Ru]-III (0.008 g, 0.013 mmol), following the general
procedure for the synthesis of pyridines (reaction time: 15 min) and
upon purification by column chromatography (Hex/EtOAc 4:1 to 2:1),
0.117 g (99%) of 2a is obtained as a white solid (mp = 105ꢀ106 °C). 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33ꢀ7.31 (m, 6H, Ph), 7.24ꢀ7.21 (m, 4H,
Ph), 5.14 (s, 4H, 2ꢁCH2O), 3.81 (s, 2H, CH2CN), 3.56 (s, 2H, CH2C),
3.55 (s, 2H CH2C), 2.38 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.8, 151.2, 149.7, 146.6, 135.1, 134.1, 128.6, 128.5,
128.1, 125.1, 116.9, 67.8, 59.7, 39.7, 38.9, 24.7, 21.6, 14.7. IR (KBr): 2240,
1732, 1586 cmꢀ1. Anal. Calcd for C28H26N2O4: C, 73.99; H, 5.77; N,
6.16. Found: C, 73.80; H, 5.83; N, 6.20.
(10) (a) Yamamoto, Y.; Kinpara, K.; Ogawa, R.; Nishiyama, H.;
Itoh, K. Chem.;Eur. J. 2006, 12, 5618–5631. (b) Varela, J. A.; Castedo,
L.; Saa, C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8595–8598.
(11) (a) Roy, R.; Das, S. K. Chem. Commun. 2000, 519–529. (b) Das,
S. K.; Roy, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4015–4018. (c) Witulski, B.;
ꢀ
ꢀ
Stengel, T.; Fernandez-Hernandez, J. M. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1965–
1966. (e) Young, D. D.; Senaiar, R. S.; Deiters, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2006,
12, 5563–5568. (f) Hoven, G. B.; Efskind, J.; Romming, C.; Undheim, K.
J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2459–2463.
(12) Peters, J.-U.; Blechert, S. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1983–1984.
ꢀ
(13) Mallagaray, A.; Medina, S.; Domınguez, G.; Perez-Castells, J.
´
Synlett 2010, 2114–2116.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX