reactions in the presence of metal catalysts,6 ninhydrin
annulations,7 intramolecular reductive N-heteroannulation,8
and reductive cyclization of hydrazone9 or 2-nitrobenzylide
naphthalide.10 The development of alternative step-eco-
nomical methods for the assembly of these heterocyclic
cores, producing less waste and byproducts, continues to
be of considerable interest and important. However, to the
best of our knowledge, a one-pot synthesis of tetracyclic
indeno[1,2-b]indoles via a multicomponent domino strat-
egy involving sequential methyl migration/aromatization/
esterification has not been documented yet.
On the other hand, multicomponent domino reactions
(MDRs) for total synthesis of natural products or natural-like
structures are believed to be one of the key tools for assem-
bling multiring-junction frameworks that can be predicted by
controlling reaction processes.11,12 These reactions have at-
tracted special attention over the past few decades because of
their high efficiency, synthetic economy, and ecology in the
construction of complex heterocyclic frameworks.13 In
addition, multicomponent strategy often proceeds with
impressive selectivity.14 Designing multicomponent domino
processes for constructing multiring-junction architectures
provides a great challenge in modern organic synthesis.
In the past several years, we have been engaging in the
development of unique MDRs that can provide easy access
to new core structures of chemical and pharmaceutical
interest.15 During our study of this project, we now discov-
ered novel multicomponent reactions of N-heteroannulations
of enaminones, 2,2-dihydroxyindene-1,3-dione, and acid
anhydride or aromatic amines; they can selectively provide
multifunctionalized indeno[1,2-b]indoles with different
substituted patterns 4 and 6 (Scheme 1). The great features
of this multicomponent domino chemistry are shown by
the fact that new fused pyrazoles (tetracyclic 6À5À5À6
skeleton) were readily formed in domino fashions that
involved sequential nucleophilic substitution/cyclization/
methyl migration/aromatization/esterification. The latter
provided new N-arylamino substituted indeno[1,2-b]indole
derivatives with excellent stereo- and regioselectivity; two
quaternary centers including a quaternary amine function-
ality were controlled very well in a one-pot operation.
The present work sets excellent examples for synthesizing
such an important family of polysubstituted indeno-
[1,2-b]indoles.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Indeno[1,2-b]indoles 4 and 6
(8) Janreddy, D.; Kavala, V.; Bosco, J. W. J.; Kuo, C.-W.; Yao, C.-F.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2360.
Recently, we established a new three-component dom-
ino reaction of enaminones for the synthesis of multifunc-
tionalized indole derivatives through allylic esterification.15e,f
During the continuation of this project, we attempted to
employ ninhydrin as a precursor to realize allylic esterifica-
tion (Table 1). In the first attempt, the reaction of enam-
inones 2a with 2,2-dihydroxyindene-1,3-dione 1 was
heated in HOAc at 100 °C under microwave irradiation
conditions (Table 1, entry 1). The reaction scarcely pro-
ceeded to give the desired product 7, even at enhanced
temperatures. When the solvent was changed to the cosol-
vent of HOAc/acetic anhydride (Table 1, entry 2), the
reaction resulted in red solids. Surprisingly, we found that
the product isnot the expected allylicesterification product
7. Instead, we found that anacetyl group was introduced in
the final product in which H chemical shift of methylene on
enaminone ring cannot be observed. Eventually, the struc-
tural elucidation was unequivocally determined by X-ray
diffraction of a single crystal 4a (Figure 1), and a novel
polysubstituted indeno[1,2-b]indole derivative 4a was pro-
duced in 35% yield (Table 1).
(9) (a) Graham, J.; Ninan, A.; Reza, K.; Sainsbury, M.; Shertzer,
H. G. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 167. (b) Brown, D. W.; Mahon, M. F.;
Ninan, A.; Sainsbury, M.; Shertzer, H. G. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 8919.
(c) Wang, J.-B.; Ji, Q.-G.; Xu, J.; Wu, X.-H.; Xie, Y.-Y. Synth. Commun.
2005, 35, 581. (d) Butera, J. A.; Antane, S. A.; Hirth, B.; Lennox, J. R.;
Sheldon, J. H.; Norton, N. W.; Warga, D.; Argentieri, T. M. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 2093. (e) Robinson, B. The Fischer Indole
Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 1982.
(10) (a) Estevez, J. C.; Estevez, R. J.; Castedo, L. Tetrahedron Lett.
ꢀ
1993, 34, 6479. (b) Reboredo, F. J.; Treus, M.; Estevez, J. C.; Castedo,
ꢀ
L.; Estevez, R. J. Synlett 2002, 999.
€
(11) (a) Meijere, A. D.; Zezschwitz, P. V.; Brase, S. Acc. Chem. Res.
2005, 38, 413. (b) Hussain, M. M.; Walsh, P. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41,
883. (c) Sun, X. L.; Tang, Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 937. (d) Wasike,
J.-C.; Obrey, S. J.; Baker, R. T.; Bazan, G. C. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105,
1001. (e) Trost, B. M.; Frontier, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
11727. (f) Trost, B. M.; Gutierrez, A. C.; Livingston, R. C. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 2539. (g) Toure, B. B.; Hall, D. G. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4439.
(h) Ganem, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 463.
(12) (a) Santra, S.; Andreana, P. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
€
9418. (b) Domling, A.; Wang, W.; Wang, K. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 3083.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
(c) Fustero, S.; Sanchez-Rosello, M.; Barrio, P.; Simon-Fuentes, A.
Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 6984. (d) Liao, L.; Jana, R.; Urkalan, K. B.;
Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5784.
ꢀ
(13) (a) Zhu, J. P.; Bienayme, H. Multicomponent Reactions; Wiley-
VCH, 2004. (b) Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke, K. Domino Reactions in
Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006. (c) Tietze, L. F. Chem.
Rev. 1996, 96, 115.
€
(14) (a) Willy, B.; Muller, T. J. J. Curr. Org. Chem. 2009, 13, 1777. (b)
Encouraged by the above results, we set the reaction of
1 with 2a as the model reaction in acetic anhydride for
optimizing reaction conditions. Experiments were carried
out in two cosolvents of TFA/Ac2O and DMF/Ac2O. The
reaction failed to give the product 4a in TFA/Ac2O
(Table 1, entry 3); an incomplete reaction was observed
in DMF/Ac2O (Table 1, entry 4). In another case, when
Ac2O was used as the solvent, the reaction proceeded more
Jiang, B.; Rajale, T.; Wever, W.; Tu, S.-J.; Li, G. Chem. Asian J. 2010, 5,
2318. (c) D’Souza, D. M.; Muller, T. J. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1095.
€
(15) (a) Jiang, B.; Li, C.; Shi, F.; Tu, S.-J.; Kaur, P.; Wever, W.; Li, G.
J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 296. (b) Jiang, B.; Tu, S.-J.; Kaur, P.; Wever, W.;
Li, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11660. (c) Li, G.; Wei, H. X.; Kim,
S. H.; Carducci, M. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4277. (d) Ma, N.;
Jiang, B.; Zhang, G.; Tu, S.-J.; Wever, W.; Li, G. Green Chem. 2010, 12,
1357. (e) Jiang, B.; Yi, M.-S.; Shi, F.; Tu, S.-J.; Pindi, S.; McDowell, P.;
Li, G. Chem. Commun. 2012, 808. (f) Jiang, B.; Feng, B.-M.; Wang
S.-L.; Tu, S.-J.; Li, G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2012, 18, 9823.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 20, 2012
5211