Job/Unit: O20677
/KAP1
Date: 09-07-12 11:21:13
Pages: 8
A. Prokop, H.-G. Schmalz et al.
FULL PAPER
(5S)-6-Oxo-5-methyl-9-hydroxy-1,2,3-trimethoxy-5,7,11,12-tetra-
hydrobenzo[a]-heptalene-10-one (24): Et2AlCl (0.430 mL, 1.0 m in
apoptosis induction (18% at 50 μm after 72 h), compound
3 did not show any significant activity. However, an inter-
esting observation was made when the compounds were ap-
plied in combination with doxorubicin to Nalm-6 cells (Fig-
ure 4).
Coapplication of different cytostatics is a common way
to increase the effectiveness of cancer therapies, because
apoptosis-inducing effects of the combined cytostatics are
sometimes higher than the sum of the individual cytotoxici-
hexane, 0.43 mmol) was added to
a solution of 3 (30 mg,
0.087 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (3 mL) at –78 °C. The solu-
tion was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h, then re-cooled to –78 °C, and care-
fully quenched by dropwise addition of MeOH. Then, saturated
aqueous NH4Cl (5 mL) was added, and the mixture was extracted
with dichloromethane (3ϫ 5 mL). The combined organic layers
were dried with Na2SO4, and the solvent was removed under re-
duced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatog-
ties (i.e., a synergy effect). The synergistic potential of new raphy (EtOAc/cyclohexane, 1:4) to afford 24 (17 mg, 57%) as a
colorless oil.
compounds can be experimentally assessed by determining
the apoptosis induction (through FACScan flow cytometry)
after cultivation of malignant cells treated with the sub-
stances alone and in combination with existing chemothera-
peutic drugs (such as doxorubicin). Indeed, it was found
that both compounds exhibited unusually pronounced syn-
ergistic effects with doxorubicin (Figure 4). For instance,
the combination of 3 (10 μm) and doxorubicin (1 nM) re-
sulted in a synergistic effect of more than 400%.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Detailed experimental and spectroscopic data.[26]
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Volkswagen Stiftung. Donations
of chemicals from Chemetall and Evonik are gratefully acknowl-
edged. The authors also would like to thank Dr. D. Blunk and Dr.
M. Drayß, Department of Chemistry, for assistance with the DFT
calculations, and Dr. M. Pietch and J. E. Stein, Department of
Pharmacology, for testing compounds 3 and 24 in a GST inhibition
assay.
Conclusions
In summary, we have exploited a [5+2] cycloaddition
strategy, based on a Rh-triggered cyclization cascade,[11] as
a key transformation for the synthesis of new 6-oxacolchic-
ine-related compounds.[24] While the final elaboration of the
tropolone ether substructure turned out to be a highly diffi-
cult task (which could not be achieved in the course of this
study), the cycloaddition product 3 was efficiently con-
verted into the interesting 11,12-dihydro-6-oxacolchicine
analog 24 in a single (Et2AlCl-mediated) step. The synthesis
of 24 was achieved in only 9 steps in 15% overall yield start-
ing from 3,4,5-trimethoxyacetophenone (8). From a chemi-
cal point of view, the unexpected difficulties in the final
functionalization reflect a surprisingly subtle dependence of
the reactivity of ring C on structural variations in ring B.
An important outcome of the study is the finding that both
cycloadduct 3 and (isomeric) dihydrotropolone 24 (while
not showing any colchicine-related biological activity)
strongly amplify the antitumoral activity of doxorubicin
against Nalm-6 cells. The molecular basis of the observed
synergistic effect may deserve further investigation in the
course of the development of future chemotherapeutic stra-
tegies.[25]
[1] E. Nogales, S. G. Wolf, K. H. Downing, Nature 1998, 391, 199–
203.
[2] P. J. Pelletier, J. B. Caventou, Ann. Chim. Phys. 1820, 14, 69–
83.
[3] a) O. Boyé, A. Brossi in The Alkaloids (Eds.: A. Brossi, G. A.
Cordell), Academic Press, San Diego, 1992, vol. 41, pp. 125–
176; b) C. LeHello in The Alkaloids (Ed.: G. A. Cordell), Aca-
demic Press, San Diego, 2000, vol. 53, ch. 5; for a comprehen-
sive review on colchicine total syntheses, see: c) T. Graening,
H.-G. Schmalz, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 3292–3318; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3230–3256.
[4] a) R. C. Weisenberg, G. G. Borisy, E. W. Taylor, Biochemistry
1968, 7, 4466–4479; b) S. Bane Hastie, Pharmacol. Ther. 1991,
51, 377–401; c) A. Brossi, H. J. Yeh, M. Chrzanowska, J. Wolff,
E. Hamel, C. M. Lin, F. Quin, M. Sulfness, J. Silverton, Med.
Res. Rev. 1988, 8, 77–94.
[5] a) W. E. Dixon, W. Malden, J. Physiol. (London) 1908, 37, 50–
76; b) R. M. Naidus, R. Rodvein, H. Mielke, Arch. Int. Med.
1977, 137, 394–396.
[6] a) Q. Shi, P. Verdier-Pinard, A. Brossi, E. Hamel, A. T.
McPhail, K. H. Lee, J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 961–966; b) B.
Bhattacharyya, D. Panda, S. Gupta, M. Banerjee, Med. Res.
Rev. 2008, 28, 155–183; c) N. Nicolaus, J. Zapke, P. Riesterer,
J.-M. Neudörfl, A. Prokop, H. Oschkinat, H.-G. Schmalz,
ChemMedChem 2010, 5, 661–665.
[7] a) E. Hamel, H. H. Ho, G. J. Kang, C. M. Lin, Biochem. Phar-
macol. 1988, 37, 2445–2449; b) B. Bhattacharyya, J. Wolff,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1974, 71, 1134–1140; c) M. Rosner,
H. G. Capraro, A. E. Jacobsen, L. Atwell, A. Brossi, M. A.
Iorio, T. H. Williams, R. H. Sik, C. F. Chignell, J. Med. Chem.
1981, 24, 257–261; d) G. G. Choudhury, A. Banerjee, B. Bhat-
tacharyya, B. B. Biswas, FEBS Lett. 1983, 161, 55–59; e) B.
Bhattacharyya, J. Wolff, J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259, 11836–11843;
f) S. B. Hastie, R. C. Williams Jr., D. Puett, T. L. McDonald,
J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 6682–6688; for a publication dealing
with colchicide, see: g) C. Dumortier, Q. Yan, S. Bane, Y. En-
gelborghs, Biochem. J. 1997, 327, 685–688; for publications
dealing with thiocolchicine, see: h) L. Velluz, G. Müller, Bull.
Soc. Chim. Fr. 1954, 755–757; i) L. Velluz, G. Müller, Bull. Soc.
Chim. Fr. 1954, 1072–1075; j) S. B. Hastie, Biochemistry 1989,
28, 7753–7760.
Experimental Section
(5R,9S,12aS)-6-Oxo-5-methyl-1,2,3-trimethoxy-9,12a-epoxy-
5,7,9,11,12,12a-hexahydrobenzo[a]heptalene-10-one (3): A solution
of 5 (0.70 g, 1.87 mmol) in toluene (50 mL) was slowly added to an
intensely stirred suspension of [Rh2(OAc)4] (24 mg, 56 μmol, 3 mol-
%) in refluxing toluene (150 mL; oil-bath temperature: 135 °C) over
a period of 4 h by means of a syringe pump. The reaction mixture
was heated at reflux for an additional 30 min, and subsequently
cooled to room temp. The solvent was removed under reduced pres-
sure, and the residue was purified by column chromatography
(EtOAc/cyclohexane, 1:4) to afford 3 (464 mg, 72%) as a colorless
solid.
6
www.eurjoc.org
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 0000, 0–0