between H-30 and H-40.13 NOESY correlations of H2-70
with H-30 and H-40 were used to place these protons on the
same face of ring D, whereas those of H-90 with H-50
revealed their spatial proximity (Figure 2). The absolute
configuration of 1 was deduced by comparison of the
experimental and simulated electronic circular dichroism
(ECD) spectra generated by time-dependent density
functional theory (TDDFT).14 Considering the above-
mentioned NOESY data, one of the four stereoisomers,
(3S,50R,60R,90R)-1, (3R,50S,60S,90S)-1, (3S,50S,60S,90S)-1,
and (3R,50R,60R,90R)-1, should represent the actual con-
figuration of 1. Since the 6/6/6/5 ring system in 1
was relatively rigid, which would significantly affect the
CD property, whereas the conformationally flexible side
chain had insignificant effect on the CD spectrum of 1, a
angle of 47.0ꢀ between H-3 and H-50 (Figure S21, Support-
ing Information), corresponding to a 3JHH value of 6.0 Hz
from the Karplus equation (3JHH = A þ B cosΦ þ C
cos2Φ; A = 7, B = ꢀ1, C = 5, Φ = dihedral angle).15,16
Whereas the dihedral angle between H-3 and H-50 was
calculated as 174.4ꢀ in conformer 4d (Figure S22, Support-
ing Information), with a theoretical 3JHH value of 13 Hz,
the actual 3JHH value observed between H-3 and H-50 in 1
was 6.0 Hz, matching that calculated in 4b, supporting the
absolute configuration deduced from the ECD spectra.
Therefore, 1 was deduced to have the 3R, 50S, 60S, and 90S
absolute configuration.
Compound 2 gave a pseudomolecular ion [M þ H]þ
peak at m/z 261.0755 by HRESIMS, consistent with the
molecular formulaC14H12O5. Its 1H and 13C NMR spectra
showed resonances for two exchangeable protons (δH
10.12 and 11.99, respectively), two methyl groups (one
methoxy), one oxymethylene, 10 sp2 carbons with two
protoned, and one carboxylic carbon (δC 170.3). Analysis
of its NMR data revealed structural similarity to corymbi-
feran lactone A,1 except that the C-7 methoxy, C-5 hydro-
xy, and C-4 hydroxymethyl group in corymbiferan lactone
A were replaced by a hydroxy, a methoxy, and a methyl
group in 2, respectively, which were supported by relavant
HMBC data, completing the planar structure of 2 as
shown. (Note: A different numbering system was used
for 2, in which C-7, C-5, and C-4 in corymbiferan lactoneA
corresponded to C-5, C-7, and C-8 in 2, respectively.)
Compound 3 was assigned the molecular formula
C12H18O5 by HRESIMS (m/z 265.1056 [M þ Na]þ; Δ
ꢀ0.4mmu). Its 1H and 13C NMR datawereconsistentwith
those for two methyls, five methylenes, two oxymethines,
two carboxylic carbons (δC 172.1 and 170.0), and a ketone
carbon (δC 208.4). The NMR data of 3 were nearly
identical to those of cephalosporolide C,17 both having
the 10-methyloxecane-2,7-dione moiety. Interpretation of
the 2D NMR data of 3established its structure as 3-dehydroxy-
4-O-acetylcephalosporolide C. The relative configura-
tion of 3 was deduced by NOED data. Upon irradiation
of H-4, enhancement was observed for H-7b in the NOE
difference spectrum of 3, whereas enhancement was
observed for H-7a upon irradiation of H-9, suggesting a
trans relationship between H-4 and H-9.
Figure 2. Selected key HMBC and NOESY correlations of 1.
simplified structure 4 was used for ECD calculations
(Figure 3). A systematic conformational analysis was
performed for 4aꢀ4d by the Molecular Operating Environ-
ment (MOE) software package using the MMFF94 mole-
cular mechanics force field calculation. The MMFF94
conformational search followed by reoptimization using
TDDFT at B3LYP/6-31G(d) basis set level afforded three
lowest-energy conformers for enantiomers 4a and 4b and
two for 4c and 4d, respectively (Figures S7 and S8, Sup-
porting Information). The overall calculated ECD spectra
of 4aꢀ4d were then generated by Boltzmann-weighting of
the conformers. The absolute configuration of 1 was
extrapolated by comparison of the experimental and cal-
culated ECD spectra of 4aꢀ4d (Figure 3). The experimen-
tal CD spectrum of 1 was nearly identical to the calculated
ECD spectrum of (3R,50S,60S,90S)-4 (4b), both showing
positive Cotton effects (CEs) in 230ꢀ265 nm, and negative
CEs in the regions of 270ꢀ295 and 295ꢀ400 nm (Figure 3).
The energy-minimized conformer of 4b showed a dihedral
The absolute configuration of 3 was assigned using the
modified Mosher’s method on the semisynthetic product 5
(Figure S25, Supporting Information).18 Specifically,
treatment of 3 with NaOHꢀMeOH afforded 5, and sub-
sequent treatment of 5 with (S)- and (R)-MTPA Cl
afforded the R- (5a) and S-MTPA (5b) esters, respectively.
The difference in chemical shift values (Δδ = δS ꢀ δR) for
the diastereomeric esters 5b and 5a was calculated to assign
the 4R absolute configuration (Figure S25, Supporting
(13) Ding, G.; Li, Y.; Fu, S.; Liu, S.; Wei, J.; Che, Y. J. Nat. Prod.
2009, 72, 182–186.
(15) Pavia, D. L.; Lampman, G. M.; Kriz, G. S. Introduction of
Spectroscopy; Thomson Learning, Ltd.: London, 2001.
(16) Crews, P.; Rodriguez, J.; Jaspars, M. Organic Structure Analysis;
Oxford University Press: New York, 1998.
(17) Rukachaisirikul, Y.; Pramjie, S.; Pakawatchai, C.; Isaka, M.;
Supothina, S. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 1953–1955.
(14) (a) Diedrich, C.; Grimme, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 2524–
2539. (b) Crawford, T. D.; Tam, M. C.; Abrams, M. L. J. Phys. Chem. A
2007, 111, 12058–12068. (c) Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Gasparrini, F.;
Ciogli, A.; Spinelli, D.; Cosimelli, B. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4707–4715.
(d) Ding, Y.; Li, X. C.; Ferreira, D. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9010–9017.
(e) Berova, N.; Bari, L. D.; Pescitelli, G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 914–
931. (f) Bringmann, G.; Bruhn, T.; Maksimenka, K.; Hemberger, Y.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 17, 2717–2727.
(18) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4092–4096.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C