and primary amine X were all found to have little reactivity
(Table 1, entries 6, 9, and 10).
Table 2. Substrate Scope of the Domino Sequencea
To optimize the catalytic performance of I, different
reaction conditions were examined. TFA proved to be a
crucial additive; its absence or replacement with other
Brønsted acids such as acetic acid, trifluoromethane/
sulfonicacid(TfOH),andhydrochloride all led to a dramatic
loss in reactivity (Table 1, entries 11ꢀ16). Solvents were
also found to be an important factor. Switching THF to
chloroform or toluene resulted in a significant decrease in
yield, albeit only with marginal effects on the stereoselec-
tivities (Table 1, entries 17 and 18). When acetonitrile or
DMF was used as the solvent, the reactivity was com-
pletely suppressed (Table 1, entries 19 and 20). In addition,
lowering the reaction temperature from rt to 0 °C caused a
complete loss of reactivity (Table 1, entry 21).
Having established optimal conditions, we explored the
generality of the present domino reaction system. As
shown in Table 2, this reaction system exhibited a broad
substrate spectrum. Various aryl alkynals underwent
smooth reactions with either propional or butanal, afford-
ing the desired chiral 3,4-dihydropyran products (6aꢀk)
with high yields (82ꢀ88%), moderate diastereoselectivities
(4:1ꢀ2:1 dr), and excellent enantioselectivities (90ꢀ92%
ee) (Table 2, entries 1ꢀ11). Relatively electron-rich aryl
alkynals gave slightly lower enantioselectivities (Table 2,
entries 12ꢀ14). Besides propional and butanal, benzyl
acetaldehyde could also furnish the reaction to give pro-
duct 6o with high yield and enantioselectivity (Table 2,
entry 15). In this case, high diastereoselectivity (9:1 dr) was
achieved. Notably, a simple recrystallization of the ob-
tained mixture products 6e and its diastereomer and their
enantiomers was demonstrated to improve the optical
purity and give virtually pure product 6e with >99:1 dr
and >99% ee (entry 5).
yield
[%]b
drc
ee [%]c
entry
product
R5/R6
(6/syn-6)
(6)
1
C6H5/Me (6a)
C6H5/Et (6b)
88
80
80
82
83
84
82
81
80
88
82
83
86
72
82
81
79
4:1
91
2
2:1
3:1
4:1
91
91
91
3
4-CF3C6H4/Me (6c)
4-COOMeC6H4/Me (6d)
4-CNC6H4/Me (6e)
4-FC6H4/Me (6f)
4
5
4:1 (>99:1)d 92 (>99)d
6
4:1
3:1
3:1
2:1
3:1
2:1
2:1
3:1
3:1
9:1
4:1
6:1
90
90
91
92
90
91
83
88
82
91
85
91
7
2,4-FC6H3/Me (6g)
4-ClC6H4/Me (6h)
4-BrC6H4/Et (6i)
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
2-naphthyl/Me (6j)
3-MeC6H4/Et (6k)
4-MeC6H4/Me (6l)
4-tBuC6H4/Me (6m)
4-MeOC6H4/Me (6n)
C6H5/Bn (6o)
C6H5/EtOOCCH2(6p)
C6H5/allyl (6q)
a Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were performed with 1
(0.2 mmol), 3 (0.16 mmol), catalyst I (0.04 mmol), and TFA (0.04 mmol)
in 1.0 mL of THF at rt for 72 h. b Combined yield of 4 and 5.
c Determined by HPLC. d The data in parentheses were obtained by
recrystallization of 4 in a mixture solvent of petroleum ether and ethyl
acetate. Me = methyl, Et = ethyl, tBu = tert-butyl, Bn = benzyl.
the products obtained in the present reaction system,
a single crystal of 4e was successfully achieved. X-ray
crystallography analysis revealed that it has a (3R,4S)-
configuration11 (Figure S3, SI).
To illustrate the utility of the present domino reaction,
the chiral products were converted into several potentially
useful new compounds in good to high yields with com-
plete preservation of the stereo- and enantiopurity
(Scheme 3). To determine the absolute stereochemistry of
Scheme 3. Transformation of the Domino Products 4a
(5) Jones, S. B.; Simmons, B.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 13606.
(6) (a) Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010,
49, 1481. (b) Liu, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, R.; Wang, W. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
4948. (c) Zhang, X.; Song, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Chen, X.; Yu, X.; Wang,
W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7282.
ꢀ
ꢀ~
(7) (a) Aleman, J.; Nunez, A.; Marzo, L.; Marcos, V.; Alvarado, C.;
ꢀ
Garcıa Ruano, J. L. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 9453. (b) Aleman, J.;
Fraile, A.; Marzo, L.; Ruano, J. L. G.; Izquierdo, C.; Dıaz-Tendero, S.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 1665.
(8) Cai, X.; Wang, C.; Sun, J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 359.
(9) For examples of synthesis of chiral 3,4-dihydropyrans: (a) Fehr,
M. J.; Consiglio, G.; Scalone, M.; Schmid, R. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
5768. (b) Evans, D. A.; Thomson, R. J.; Franco, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 10816.
a Reaction conditions: (a) Et3SiH, BF3 Et2O, DCM, 0 °C, 12 h; (b)
H2O, Tf2NH, DCM, rt, 2 h; (c) PCC, DCM, rt, 24 h; (d) Ac2O, DIPEA,
DCM, 0 °C, 1 h; (e) Sn(OTf)2, MeOH, rt, 12 h.
3
(10) For selected examples of organocatalytic inverse-electron-
demand oxa-DielsꢀAlder rection: (a) Juhl, K.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1498. (b) Samanta, S.; Krause, J.; Mandal, T.;
Zhao, C.-G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2745. (c) Xie, H.; Zu, L.; Oueis, H. R.; Li,
H.; Wang, J.; Wang, W. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1923. (d) Yao, W.; Pan, L.;
Wu, Y.; Ma, C. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2422. (e) Wang, J.; Yu, F.; Zhang,
X.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2561. (f) Gallier, F.; Hussain, H.; Martel,
A.; Kirschning, A.; Dujardin, G. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3060. (g) Xu, Z.;
Liu, L.; Wheeler, K.; Wang, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3484.
(h) Li, J.-L.; Liu, T.-Y.; Chen, Y.-C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 1491.
As for the mechanistic aspects associated with the pre-
sent domino reaction system, we initially suspected that the
(11) CCDC 899100 contains the supplementary crystallographic
data for 4e. These data can be obtained free of charge from The
data_request/cif.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C