ChemComm
Communication
and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in
University is gratefully acknowledged.
Notes and references
1 For reviews: (a) Quaternary Stereocenters. Challenges and Solutions
in Organic Synthesis, ed. J. Christoffers and A. Baro, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2006; (b) E. A. Peterson and L. E. Overman, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2004, 101, 11943; (c) B. M. Trost and C. Jiang,
Synthesis, 2006, 369; (d) M. Bella and T. Gasperi, Synthesis, 2009, 1583.
2 For spirotetronate natural products, see: (a) A. L. Zografos and
D. Georgiadis, Synthesis, 2006, 3157; (b) R. Schobert and A. Schlenk,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2008, 16, 4203; (c) A. Bartoli, F. Rodier, L. Commeiras,
J.-L. Parrain and G. Chouraqui, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2011, 28, 763.
3 (a) W. R. Roush and D. A. Barda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 7402;
(b) W. R. Roush and R. J. Sciotti, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 7411;
(c) H. Usuda, A. Kuramochi, M. Kanai and M. Shibasaki, Org. Lett.,
2004, 6, 4387; (d) B. D. Jones, J. J. Clair, C. E. Moore, A. L. Rheingold
and M. D. Burkart, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 4516.
Scheme 3 A plausible reaction mechanism.
4 For recent reviews, see: (a) R. Rios, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 1060;
(b) A. Moyano and R. Rios, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 4703; For selected
references, see: (c) G. Bencivenni, L.-Y. Wu, A. Mazzanti, B. Giannichi,
F. Pesciaioli, M.-P. Song, G. Bartoli and P. Melchiorre, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 7200; (d) K. Jiang, Z. J. Jia, X. A. Yin, L. Wu and
Y. C. Chen, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 2766; (e) X. Companyo, A. Zea,
A.-N. R. Alba, A. Mazzanti, A. Moyano and R. Rios, Chem. Commun.,
2010, 46, 6953; ( f ) L. L. Wang, L. Peng, J. F. Bai, Q. C. Huang, X. Y. Xu
and L. X. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 8064.
ð3Þ
ð4Þ
5 For a secondary amine-catalyzed Michael/Baylis–Hillman reaction
´
via 1,3-H transfer, see: S. Cabrera, J. Aleman, P. Bolze, S. Bertelsen
and K. A. Jørgensen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 121.
6 For recent reviews on Baylis–Hillman (BH) reaction, see:
(a) D. Basavaiah, B. S. Reddy and S. S. Badsara, Chem. Rev., 2010,
110, 5447; (b) D. Basavaiah, K. V. Rao and R. J. Reddy, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2007, 36, 1581; (c) V. Singh and S. Batra, Tetrahedron, 2008,
64, 4511; (d) G. Masson, C. Housseman and J. Zhu, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4614; (e) G. N. Ma, J. J. Jiang, M. Shi and Y. Wei,
Chem. Commun., 2009, 5496; only one example exist involving the
formation of quaternary carbon from BH adducts via 1,5-H transfer,
see: ( f ) P. Shanmugam and V. Vaithiyanathan, Tetrahedron, 2008,
64, 3322.
7 For our recent studies on spirocycle synthesis, see (a) W. Yao, Y. Wu,
G. Wang, Y. Zhang and C. Ma, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9713;
(b) W. Yao, L. Pan, Y. Wu and C. Ma, Org. Lett., 2010, 11, 2422;
(c) X. Wang, W. Yao, Z. Yao and C. Ma, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 2959.
8 Substrates 1 and 5 were prepared by the Wittig reaction of cyclic
b-oxoaldehydes and triphenylphosphoranes. Thus, 1a was formed in
90% yield with E-configuration according to the NOESY and COSY
spectrums.
Although aryl-substituted 9 could react with 2a to give the
corresponding adduct 11 in 61% yields, unfortunately, no
further cyclized product 12 was detected (eqn (3)). On the other
hand, almost no productive reaction was observed when
ketones 10 and 2a were mixed for 24 h (eqn (4)). These results
suggested that the electronic effect played critical roles herein,
most probably upon enhancing the acidity of protons adjacent to
the ester group of 1 and 3 to prompt not only the first Michael
addition but also the terminal proton transfer sequence.
A plausible mechanism for this tertiary amine-catalyzed
spiro-carbocyclization procedure is depicted in Scheme 3. Thus,
initial Brønsted base-catalyzed14 regioselective Michael addi-
tion of 1a to 2 gives syn-3 as a single diastereomer via an
extended enolate I. Subsequent conjugate addition of DABCO
onto 3 affords 3-ammonium enolate II,15 which undergoes an
intramolecular aldol-type reaction with the remote ketone unit
to deliver intermediate III. Finally, 1,5-proton transfer ensues,
9 For
a review of arylidene pyruvic acid and derivatives, see:
(a) M. Shiri, M. M. Heravi and B. Soleymanifard, Tetrahedron,
2012, 68, 6593; For secondary amine catalyzed formal [3+3] annula-
tion of cycloketones via enamine activation, see: (b) C.-L. Cao,
X.-L. Sun, Y.-B. Kang and Y. Tang, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 4151.
giving rise to product 4 with concomitant regeneration of the 10 Only one single diastereomer was formed according to the 1H-NMR
spectra of the crude reaction product. The tautomerization of
catalyst, directly or assisted by DABCO. Nevertheless, the effect
enolizable 3 under basic conditions presumably improved the
of trace amounts of water is not very clear currently. One
diastereoselectivity of this reaction to furnish the more stable
explanation to address this involves that trace amounts of
water should stabilize the intermediate III, thus increasing
its concentration and accelerating a plausible bimolecular
1,5-proton transfer sequence.13
In summary, we have developed a tertiary amine catalyzed
carbocyclization protocol to furnish a variety of spiroketones
with cyclohexene moieties which contain three newly formed
stereocenters including two adjacent quaternary centers in
generally good yields and excellent diastereoselectivities.
diastereomer of syn-3.
11 For other DABCO catalyzed Baylis–Hillman reaction via 1,3-H
transfer, see: (a) X. Franck and B. Figadere, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2002, 43, 1449; (b) B. Lesch and S. Brase, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2004, 43, 115.
12 Isolated 3a carried out the cyclization to give 4a in 95% yield by
DABCOꢀ6H2O in anhydrous 1,4-dioxane at 25 1C.
13 Protic solvents were considered favoring the terminal 1,3-proton
transfer in typical BH reaction, see: (a) V. K. Aggarwal, Y. Sarah,
S. Y. Fulford and G. C. Loyd-Jones, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005,
44, 1706; (b) R. Robiette, V. K. Aggarwal and J. N. Harvey, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 15513.
Experiments designed to explore the scope, limitations, and 14 For
a review on Brønsted bases catalysis, see: C. Palomo,
´
M. Oiarbide and R. Lopez, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 632.
15 For reviews, see: (a) S. E. Denmark and G. L. Beutner, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 1560; (b) M. J. Gaunt and C. C. C. Johansson,
Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 5596.
asymmetric variants of this reaction are ongoing.
Financial support from NSFC (No. 21072166), the Zhejiang
Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (R4110055),
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun.