Evans anti-aldol reaction18 of trans-cinnamaldehyde, was
silylated to give the silyl ether 15, which was reduced with
DIBAL-H to provide the aldehyde 16. Vinylogous
Mukaiyama aldol reaction19 of 16 with the dienol silyl ether
1720 afforded the β-hydroxy ketone 18 in 95% yield with
10:1 diastereoselectivity. Exposure of 18 to pyridinium
p-toluenesulfonate (PPTS) in MeOH delivered the methyl
acetal 19.16 At this stage, the minor diastereomer at C5 was
removed by flash column chromatography using silica gel.
After protection of the C5 hydroxy group as its MPM ether
20, the ester group was hydrolyzed to afford the carboxylic
acid 8a. Meanwhile, oxidative cleavage of the double bond
of 20, Takai olefination21 of the derived aldehyde, and
subsequent hydrolysis provided the carboxylic acid 8b.
With the requisite fragments 7 and 8a,b available, we
focused our attentiononthe assemblyofthe fragmentsand
subsequent RCM (Scheme 4). Esterification of 8 and 9a,b
under Yamaguchi conditions22 proceededcleanly to afford
the dienes 21a,b. We first examined the RCM of 21a using
the second-generation Grubbs (G-II)23 or HoveydaÀ
Grubbs (HG-II)24 precatalyst under various conditions.
However, only traces of the macrolactone 22 were ob-
tained, and the partial degradation of 21a was observed.
We thought that the low reactivity of 21a toward the RCM
could be ascribed to the styryl group. Accordingly, we next
investigated the RCM of 21b and eventually found that 22
could be isolated in 81% yield upon exposure of 21b to
HG-II (11 mol %) and 1,4-benzoquinone (1.5 equiv)25 in
toluene (3 mM) at 140 °C. The stereochemistry of the
newly generated double bond was determined to be E by a
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Carboxylic Acids 8a,b
3
large coupling constant, JH‑8,H‑9 = 15.5 Hz.26 At this
point, the minor diastereomer resulting from the Roush
crotylation of 10 was removed by flash column chromato-
graphy using silica gel.
Scheme 4. Construction of the Macrocyclic Backbone
Completion of the total synthesis is depicted in Scheme 5.
Hydrogenation of 22 followed by selective removal of the
TBDPS group27 gave the alcohol 23. Oxidation of 23 and
Takai olefination28 of the resultant aldehyde provided,
(19) (a) Mukaiyama, T.; Ishida, A. Chem. Lett. 1975, 319–322. For a
review, see: (b) Casiraghi, G.; Zanardi, F.; Appendino, G.; Rassu, G.
Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1929–1972.
(20) (a) Chan, T.-H.; Brownbridge, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
3534–3538. (b) Kimura, M.; Esoe, A.; Mori, M.; Iwata, K.; Tamaru, Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8559–8568.
(21) (a) Okazoe, T.; Takai, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 951–953. (b) Su, O.; Dakin, L. A.; Panek, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2007,
72, 2–24.
(22) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989–1993.
(23) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999,
1, 953–956.
(24) Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.; Gray, B. L.; Hoveyda, A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8168–8179.
(25) Hong, S. H.; Sanders, H. P.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17160–17161.
(26) The stereoselectivity observed for RCM of 21b was opposite to
that observed in our previous syntheses of structurally related
14-membered macrolides. See: Fuwa, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Sasaki, M.
Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 7492–7503and ref 12. It appears that the C10 and
C11 substituents affected the stereochemical outcome.
(27) Higashibayashi, S.; Shinko, K.; Ishizu, T.; Hashimoto, K.;
Nakata, M. Synlett 2000, 1306–1308.
(28) (a) Takai, K.; Nitta, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 7408–7410. (b) Evans, D. A.; Black, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 4497–4513.
(17) For reviews, see: (a) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1–28.
(b) Swamy, K. C. K.; Kumar, N. N. B.; Balaraman, E.; Kumar, K. V.
P. P. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 2551–2651.
(18) Evans, D. A.; Downey, C. W.; Shaw, J. T.; Tedrow, J. S. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 1127–1130.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C