Table 1. UV Absorptions of Carbenes 1 and Carbanions 2a
Table 2. Equilibrium and Kinetic Data for eq 2
b
b
c
c
c
X
λobsd
λcalcd
fb
λobsd
λcalcd
fc
X
Kexp (Mꢀ1 a
)
Kcalcd (Mꢀ1 a
)
10ꢀ8kfb
10ꢀ7kb
H
292
324
324
316
308
291
310
288
293
296
0.4770
0.5454
0.5254
0.4874
0.3880
404
388
388
388
388
393
396
397
388
393
0.1961
0.2421
0.2570
0.1776
0.2139
H
4.11
31.3
242
1.51 ꢁ 10ꢀ1
5.00
8.76 ꢁ 104
6.91 ꢁ 10ꢀ2
1.08 ꢁ 102
1.97
3.16
5.19
1.02
3.85
4.91
p-Cl
p-CF3
p-F
p-Cl
p-CF3
p-F
1.01
0.215
3.36
3.04
55.7
m-Cl
m-Cl
0.692
a Reported in nm in DCE. Experimental absorbances are calibrated.
See ref 7 for computational details. b Principal carbene absorptions.
Only the strong π f p absorption is listed; weak σ f p carbene
absorptions were observed at ∼600 nm. c Principal carbanion
absorptions.
a In DCE. b Rate constants in Mꢀ1 sꢀ1. See SI for temperatures and
errors. c In sꢀ1
.
of Table 2, the computed values for eq 2 with X = p-NO2,
p-Me, and p-OMe were included in the regression anal-
ysis.14 Hammett substituent constants were taken from
Smith and March.15
First consider Kexp: inclusion of K for X = F (1d/2d) is
deleterious to the correlation. Omitting Kexp for p-F
leads to an excellent four-point correlation of log K vs
σp, with F = þ3.26 (r = 0.995); cf. Figure S-41. Inclusion
of the p-F point causes significant decay in the fitting: log
K vs σp now gives F = þ3.67 and r is reduced to 0.937; cf.
Figure S-42. The positive values obtained for F imply
that carbanion formation is favored by electron with-
drawing substituents X, which destabilize carbene 1 but
Values of this ratio were determined over the 150ꢀ200
ns time interval as [TBACl] varied from 0.25 to 0.49 M; see
the SI for the resulting LFP spectra. BeerꢀLambert anal-
ysis of the data used computed oscillator strengths (f; see
Table 1)7 in place of the unknown extinction coefficients
of 1b and 2b.9,10 A plot of A324/A388 vs 1/[TBACl] gave a
linear correlation (Figure S-17 in the SI), whose slope
(0.072) led to K = 31.3 ((1.7) Mꢀ1 for eq 2 when
X = p-Cl.11
Values of K were similarly determined for the other
carbene/carbanion pairs; data for the unsubstituted 1a/2a
pair were taken from ref 2. Values of observed (Kexp) and
calculated (Kcalcd) equilibrium constants7 are collected in
Table 2. These values are specific to DCE solution and
ignore the possible aggregation of TBACl or the TBA salts
of the carbanions.12 We attempted to measure K for eq 2
with X = p-Me or p-NO2. However, with p-Me, K was too
small and the carbanion absorbance (at 404 nm) was too
weak for reliable measurement. With p-NO2, K was too
large and the carbene absorption (at 324 nm) could not be
accurately measured; the carbanion appeared at 500 nm.
The kinetics of the forward process of eq 2 were followed
by LFP, monitoring the apparent rate of formation of each
carbanion as a function of [TBACl]. Rate constants (kf)
were obtained from the slopes of these correlations; see the
SI.13 Values of kb for the reverse process were obtained
from the experimental data for K and kf, according to
kb = kf/K. The rate constants are collected in Table 2.
Hammett analyses were performed for Kexp, Kcalcd, kf,
and kb of Table 2. For Kcalcd, in addition to the five cases
stabilize carbanion 2. The p-F substituent has σp
=
þ0.15, indicating an electron withdrawing group that
should enhance carbanion formation relative to H (σp = 0).
However, the computed Kcalcd values in Table 2 indi-
cate that p-F suppresses carbanion formation relative
to H; Kcalcd(X = F)/Kcalcd(X = H) = 0.46. In other
words, p-F acts as a net donor of electron density in
eq 2; electron donation from a lone pair on F by
resonance outweighs electron withdrawal by induc-
tion. Given that p-F directly interacts with the carbene
or carbanion center via the phenyl ring, σpþ (ꢀ0.07) is a
possible alternative for σp (þ0.15) to represent p-F in a
Hammett analysis of eq 2.
Indeed, an excþellent correlation of log Kexp vs σ is
obtained using σp for F (and σm for m-Cl); cf. Figure 1
where F = þ3.18 (r = 0.996). Note, however, that using
þ
σp also for p-Cl leads to a decreased quality in the fit;
F = þ3.01, þbut r decreases to 0.959, Figure S-43.16
Using σp for p-F, rather than σp, is one possible
response to the computational results indicating that the
p-F substituent behaves as a net donor of electron density
(9) Moss, R. A.; Wang, L.; Odorisio, C. M.; Krogh-Jespersen, K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10677.
þ
in eq 2. The use of σp is similar to using σm for m-Cl.
(10) Formally, the computed oscillator strengths are proportional to
the frequency-integrated absorption coefficients. Although the widths of
the carbene and carbanion absorption bands differ, we did not correct
for this. We conservatively estimate that the fcarbene/fcarbanion ratio
accurately reproduces the desired εcarbene/εcarbanion extinction constant
ratio to within a factor of 2.
However, if a “pure” approach is preferred, one can simply
accept the correlation þwith σp for p-F. The difference in F
values (þ3.18 with σp vs þ3.67 with σp) is neither very
large nor mechanistically significant. In all the Hammett
(11) K = (slope)ꢀ1(f2/f1), where f2 is the computed oscillator strength
of the carbene and f1 is the analogous factor for the carbanion. For 1b,
f2 = 0.5454 at 324 nm and f1 = 0.2421 at 388 nm (cf. Table 1).
(12) The computed and experimental K values clearly fall in the same
order. Numerical differences may have arisen, because the calculations
did not treat the dissolved ions in sufficient detail, ignoꢀring inter aliþa
cationꢀanion interactions between both TBAþ and Cl , and TBA
and 2.
(14) Calculated7 values of K for eq 2 with X = p-NO2, p-Me, and
p-OMe are 1.46 ꢁ 1014, 1.16 ꢁ 10ꢀ3, and 4.24 ꢁ 10ꢀ6 Mꢀ1, respectively.
See Table S-1 in the SI.
(15) Smith, M. B.; March, J. March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry,
Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure, 6th ed.; Wiley: New York, 2007;
p 404.
(16) The 3pꢀ2p overlap of Cl with the para phenyl carbon atom is less
efficient for transmission of electronic effects than the 2pꢀ2p FꢀC
overlap; hence, σp is more appropriate than σpþ for the p-Cl substituent.
(13) kf values were redetermined in DCE. The values in ref 2 were
measured in MeCN/THF or CCl4.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 8, 2013
2015