COMMUNICATIONS
whereas 3c and 3j were active against breast cancer Acknowledgements
cells. Notably, none of these compounds showed a sig-
The authors thank the management of DRILS and CSIR
[Grant 02(0127)/13/EMR-II] for support.
nificant effect (IC50 >88 mM) on non-cancerous
HUVEC cells indicating their selectivity (>10-fold)
towards cancer cells. To understand the mechanism of
action, 3c and 3e were tested for their inhibitory po-
tential against sirtuins (class III NAD-dependent de- References
acetylases) that are shown to be up-regulated in vari-
ous types of cancer[12] and their inhibition allows re-
expression of silenced tumour suppressor genes lead-
ing to reduced growth of cancer cells. In the Sirt1
fluorescence activity assay[13a] 3c, 3e and the reference
drug suramin showed 71, 67 and 78% inhibition [and
no inhibition by doxorubicin (negative control)] at
10 mM (see Figure S-1 in the Supporting Information)
indicating that the anticancer properties of 3c and 3e
are possibly due to their sirtuin inhibiting proper-
ties.[13b] Based on encouraging cytotoxicity, selectivity
and sirtuin inhibitory properties, the compounds 3c
and 3e appeared to be of further interest. Overall,
our study confirmed that modification of A via incor-
porating the structural features of SB-277,011A
(Figure 1) afforded compounds based on B that main-
tained the cytotoxic properties of A.
[1] For in depth reviews, see: a) A. V. Lygin, A. de Mei-
jere, Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 9280; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2010, 49, 9094; b) M. Tobisu, N. Chatani, Chem.
Lett. 2011, 40, 330; c) G. Qiu, Q. Ding, J. Wu, Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 5257.
[2] a) H. S. Andersen, G. C. T. Kampen, I. T. Christensen,
J. P. Mogensen, A. R. Larsen, J. P. Kilburn, World
Patent Appl. WO2004089470 A2, 2004; b) D. Beattie,
A.-O. Colson, A. J. Culshaw, L. Sharp, E. Stanley, L.
Sviridenko, World Patent Appl. WO 2010015655 A1,
2010; c) G. Stemp, T. Ashmeade, C. L. Branch, M. S.
Hadley, A. J. Hunter, C. N. Johnson, D. J. Nash, K. M.
Thewlis, A. K. Vong, N. E. Austin, P. Jeffery, K. Y. Ave-
nell, I. Boyfield, J. J. Hagan, D. N. Middlemiss, C.
Reavill, G. J. Riley, C. Routledge, M. Wood, J. Med.
Chem. 2000, 43, 1878.
[3] See, for example: a) T. Yin, S. He, G. Shen, T. Ye, F.
Guo, Y. Wang, Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 4103; b) M.
Bhatia, T. Collins, E. Sachlos, R. M. Risueno, U.S.
Patent Appl. US 20130065887 A1, 2013; c) Y. L. Chen,
H. M. Hung, C. M. Lu, K. C. Li, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2004, 12, 6539.
In conclusion, the change of solvent and base af-
forded a new, straightforward and inexpensive yet in-
novative method to synthesize N-substituted 6H-
indolo[2,3-b]quinoline-11-carboxamides. An apparent
CO insertion whereby an amide bond formation via
double isocyanide incorporation during Pd-catalyzed
construction of indoloquinoline ring in a single pot is
the key feature of this method that was facilitated by
the use of DBU in aqueous DMSO. This operational-
ly simple methodology that afforded a new class of
promising cytotoxic agents is unprecedented and may
find applications in organic/medicinal chemistry.
[4] For an excellent review, see: V. R. Pattabiraman, J. W.
Bode, Nature 2011, 480, 471.
[5] B. Prasad, S. B. Nallapati, S. K. Kolli, A. K. Sharma, S.
Yellanki, R. Medisetti, P. Kulkarni, S. Sripelly, K. Muk-
kanti, M. Pal, RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 62966.
[6] a) H. Liu, G. Laurenczy, N. Yan, P. J. Dyson, Chem
Commun. 2014, 50, 341; b) for a review, see: C. L.
Allen, J. M. J. Williams, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3405.
[7] a) Q. Gao, P. Zhou, F. Liu, W.-J. Hao, C. Yao, B. Jiang,
S.-J. Tu, Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 9519; b) Y.-Y. Pan,
Y.-N. Wu, Z.-Z. Chen, W.-J. Hao, G. Li, S.-J. Tu, B.
Jiang, J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 5764; c) G. C. Senadi,
W.-P. Hu, S. S. K. Boominathan, J.-J. Wang, Chem. Eur.
J. 2015, 21, 998; d) C. Masdeu, E. Gꢃmez, N. A. O. Wil-
liams, R. Lavilla, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 3103;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3043.
[8] a) D. Tejedor, F. Garcia-Tellado, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007,
36, 484; b) G. Bez, C. Zhao, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4991;
c) J. D. Winkler, S. M. Asselin, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3975;
d) V. S. Korotkov, O. V. Larionov, A. de Meijere, Syn-
thesis 2006, 3542; e) M. H. Mosslemin, I. Yavari, M.
Anary-Abbasinejad, M. R. Nateghi, J. Fluorine Chem.
2004, 125, 1497.
[9] a) The reaction was performed in a sealed tube at
1108C. The reaction did not proceed well when per-
formed at 808C in a round-bottom flask; b) B. Prasad,
B. Y. Sreenivas, D. Rambabu, G. R. Krishna, C. M.
Reddy, K. L. Kumar, M. Pal, Chem. Commun. 2013, 49,
3970.
[10] Crystal data for 3t: C22H21N3OFCl (M=397.87): mono-
clinic, space group P21/n (no. 14), a=15.627(3) ꢄ, b=
7.9992(13) ꢄ, c=16.280(3) ꢄ, b=103.130(2)8, V=
Experimental Section
General Procedure for the Preparation of Indolo[2,3-
b]quinolin-11-carboxamides (3)
To a mixture of N-(4-substituted-2-iodophenyl)-N-(1-alkyl-
1H-indol-2-yl)methanesulfonamide (1) (1 mmol), Pd(OAc)2
(5 mol%), PPh3 (10 mol%) and DBU (2.5 mmol) in 5%
aqueous DMSO (2 mL) was added isocyanide (3 mmol)
slowly and then the mixture was stirred at 808C for 35-.40
min. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC.
Upon completion of the reaction, the mixture was cooled to
room temperature, and filtered to remove the solid materi-
als. The filtrate was extracted with ethyl acetate (3ꢂ15 mL).
The organic layers were collected, combined, dried over an-
hydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under a reduced
pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatogra-
phy over silica gel using 5–10% ethyl acetate-hexane to give
the desired product 3.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 0000, 000, 0 – 0
6
ꢁ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÞÞ
These are not the final page numbers!