nitrogen-based heterocycles,7 we have initiated a study
aimed at the development of a new palladium-catalyzed
sequence for the rapid construction of dihydroquinoline
frameworks, to be possibly adapted to pseudo-domino
conditions.
Quinolines and their fully or partially hydrogenated
derivatives are widely found in many biologically active
natural or synthetic products.8 In particular, 1,2-dihydro-
quinolines have received special attention because of their
numerous applications as pharmaceuticals and agrochem-
icals, as well as their use as intermediates in the synthesis of
other heterocycles of biological significance.9
chronologically switchable catalytic processes: an allylic
amination16 and a BuchwaldꢀHartwig arylic amination
reaction.17 The reaction, which starts from readily avail-
able MBH alcohol adducts, generates water and a halide
salt as the byproducts and can be run under pseudo-domino
conditions (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Domino Sequence to 1,2-Dihydroquinolines
Consequently, a number of strategies have been devel-
oped for the synthesis of these scaffolds including transition-
metal-10 or organo-catalyzed11 reactions, as well as one-pot
approaches from MoritaꢀBaylisꢀHillman (MBH) ad-
ducts. Indeed, the use of functionalized adducts derived
from the MBH reaction12 is a convenient synthetic ap-
proach for the construction of various quinoline deriva-
tives.13,14 However, to the best of our knowledge, there are
no reports concerning their one-pot synthesis directly from
MBH alcohol adducts.15
We began our study by focusing our attention on the
allylic amination of MBH adducts. In particular, we
selected, for this step, a poorly nucleophilic amine such
as aniline so as to avoid a competitive 1,4-addition on the
R,β-unsaturated ester.18
Recent studies have shown that combinations of
[PdCl(η3-C3H5)]2 with a large bite-angle ligand allow the
selective amination of allylic alcohols.16 Accordingly, we
decided to perform our first allylic amination tests on
the MBH adduct 1a lacking an o-halo substituent, using
Xantphos as the ligand in the presence of 1.5 equivalents
of aniline in 1,4-dioxane at 80 °C. While Pd(OAc)2 or
Pd(dba)2 as Pd source gave no reaction (Table 1, entries 1
and 2), the dimer [PdCl(η3-C3H5)]2 afforded the desired
allylic amine 2a in 98% yield (entry 3). DPEPhos (entry 4)
and dppf (entry 5) proved to be more efficient than
monophosphine ligands (entry 6). When the reaction was
carried out without either the precatalyst/ligand system
(entry 7) or the precatalyst (entry 8), we recovered the
unreacted starting material.19 These two last experiments
suggest that a transient η3-allyl palladium complex is likely
to be involved in this transformation and rule out an
alternative SN20 pathway.
Herein, we describe a palladium-catalyzed synthesis
of 1,2-dihydroquinolines through the formation of two
CꢀN bonds via two mechanistically independent and
(8) (a) Solomon, V. R.; Lee, H. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011, 18, 1488. (b)
Sridharan, V.; Suryavanshi, P. A.; Menendez, C. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111,
7157. (c) Kaur, K.; Jain, M.; Reddy, R. P.; Jain, R. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2010, 45, 3245. (d) Michael, J. P. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 166 and other
previous reports in this series.
(9) Jones, G. In: Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II; Katritzky,
A. R., Rees, C. W., Scriven, E. F. V., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1996;
Vol. 5, p 167.
(10) (a) Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Yu, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, Y.; Sun, X. J. Org.
Chem. 2012, 77, 8615. (b) Kothandaraman, P.; Foo, S. J.; Chan, P. W. H.
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5947. (c) Liu, X.-Y.; Ding, P.; Huang, J.-S.; Che,
C. M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2645. (d) Yi, C. S.; Yun, S. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 17000. (e) Williamson, N. M.; Ward, A. D. Tetrahedron 2005,
61, 155. (f) Lu, G.; Malinakova, H. C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4701. (f)
Theeraladanon, C.; Arisawa, M.; Nishida, A.; Nakagawa, M. Tetra-
hedron 2004, 60, 3017. (g) Pastine, S. J.; Youn, S.-W.; Sames, D.
Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8859. (h) Ranu, B. C.; Hajra, A.; Dev, S. S.; Jana,
U. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 813.
(11) (a) Li, H.; Wang, J.; Xie, H.; Zu, L.; Jiang, W.; Duesler, E. N.;
ꢀ
Submission of the chloro-substituted MBH adduct 1b to
the reaction conditions as previously optimized with 1a
gave cleanly the corresponding allylic amination product
2b (Table 1, entry 9). On the other hand, the corresponding
bromoester 2c could be obtained only when starting from
Wang, W. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 965. (b) Sunden, H.; Rios, R.; Ibrahem, I.;
ꢀ
Zhao, G.-L.; Erikssson, L.; Cordova, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349,
827.
(12) For recent reviews, see: (a) Basavaiah, D.; Veeraraghavaiah, G.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 68. (b) Basavaiah, D.; Reddy, B. S.; Badsara,
S. S. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 5447. (c) Declerck, V.; Martinez, J.; Lamaty,
F. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 1. (d) Basavaiah, D.; Rao, A. J.; Satyanarayana,
R. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 811.
20
the allylic acetate 1c0 (Table 1, entry 11), while no re-
action was obtained from the brominated MBH allylic
alcohol 1c (Table 1, entry 10).
These results strongly suggest that, under such condi-
tions, the reactivity scale of oxidative addition to Pd(0)
decreases in the order: allylic acetate > aryl bromide >
allylic alcohol > aryl chloride (Scheme 2).
(13) For SN20ꢀSNAr one-pot strategy from MBH acetate adducts,
see: (a) Napoleon, J. V.; Manheri, M. K. Synthesis 2011, 3379. (b) Kim,
J. N.; Lee, H. J.; Lee, K. Y.; Kim, H. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3737.
(c) Kim, J. N.; Im, Y. J.; Gong, J. H.; Lee, K. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001,
42, 4195.
(14) For stepwise strategy involving SN20-palladium-catalyzed ami-
dation from MBH acetate adducts, see: Park, Y. S.; Cho, M. Y.; Kwon,
Y. B.; Yoo, B. W.; Yoon, C. M. Synth. Commun. 2007, 37, 2677.
(15) During the preparation of this manuscript, a copper-catalyzed
domino SN20-coupling reaction was reported from the MBH acetate
adducts: Niu, Q.; Mao, H.; Yuan, G.; Gao, J.; Liu, H.; Tu, Y.; Wang, X.;
Lv, X. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 1185.
(16) For recent reviews, see: (a) Sundararaju, B.; Achard, M.; Bruneau,
C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4467. (b) Bandini, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 994. (c) Bandini, M.; Tragni, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009,
7, 1501. (d) Muzart, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3077. (e) Tamaru, Y.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2647. (f) Muzart, J. Tetrahedron 2005, 61,
4179.
(17) For recent reviews, see: (a) Hartwig, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008,
41, 1534. (b) Schlummer, B.; Scholz, U. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346,
1599.
(18) Kaye, P. T.; Musa, M. A. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33, 1755.
(19) Toluene as a solvent also gave full conversion. However, this
solvent was highly detrimental for the domino process.
(20) This reaction was also described to occur without any catalyst.
See ref 14.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX