440
G. Gheno et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 467 (2013) 439–449
washed twice with diethyl ether, dissolved in dichloromethane
and recrystallized in hexane. The complex was dried under vac-
uum. The dichlorobis(3-hydroxyflavone)titanium(IV), complex 1,
brown solid, yield 70%. Elemental analysis: % theoretical calculated
for C30H18O6TiCl2 (M = 592.77 g/mol): C 60.73%, H 3.04%, found:
C 60.44%, H 3.08%. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3), ı (ppm): 8.52 (d,
ꢀ
ꢀ
J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, H6 ,2 ); 8.08 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, H5); 7.81 (dd, J = 1.4 and
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
8.6 Hz, 1H, H8); 7.77 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, H7); 7.6–7.4 (m, 3H, H3 ,4 ,5 );
7.42 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H, H6). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3), ı (ppm): 171.4
ꢀ
(C4); 164.9 (C9); 155.6 (C2); 147.1 (C3); 134.9 (C7); 131.9 (C4 ); 129.7
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
(C1 ); 129.3 (C3 ,5 ); 129.0 (C2 ,6 ); 125.90 (C5); 125.6 (C6); 118.3
(C8); 117.5 (C10). The dichlorobis(3-hydroxyflavone)zirconium(IV),
complex 2, yellow solid, yield 77%. Elemental analysis: % theoret-
ical calculated for C30H18O6ZrCl2 (M = 636.12 g/mol): C 56.59%, H
2.83%, found: C 53.03%, H 3.09%. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6), ı
ꢀ
ꢀ
(ppm): 8.25 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H, H6 ,2 ); 8.16 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, H5); 7.95
(m, 2H, H7,8); 7.65 (td, J = 1.7 and 6.2 Hz, 1H, H6); 7.39 (t, J = 8.4 Hz,
1H, H4 ); 7.30 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, H5 ,3 ). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6),
ı (ppm): 179.3 (C4); 154.6 (C9); 148.6 (C2); 146.2 (C3); 134.9 (C7);
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
Fig. 1. Structure and atomic numbering of 3HF.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
130.5 (C1 ); 130.3 (C4 ); 128.3 (C3 ,5 ); 127.2 (C2 ,6 ); 125.9 (C5); 123.7
(C6); 118.8 (C10); 117.7 (C8).
nickel (II) [15], iron (III) [16], copper [17], manganese and cobalt
[18].
Based on our previous works with the pyrone heterocyclic,
we studied the coordination of 3-hydroxyflavone (3HF) bidentate
chelating ligand with Ti and Zr and tested the behavior of the
two new complexes, dichlorobis(3-hydroxyflavone)titanium(IV)
and dichlorobis(3-hydroxyflavone)zirconium(IV) in ethylene poly-
merization. The advantage in using 3-hydroxyflavone ligand is its
provenance from renewable resources and its ease complexation
with transition metals. To the best of our knowledge there are not
works in the literature reporting those 3-hydroxyflavone-M (M = Ti
and Zr) complexes and their activity in ethylene polymerization.
Some parameters such as ethylene pressure, cocatalyst/catalyst
ratio and reaction temperature were studied in the aim to improve
the catalytic activity.
2.2.1. Complex characterization
The 1H NMR spectra of the complexes were recorded on a Var-
ian Inova 300 Spectrometer, using DMSO-d6 or CDCl3 as solvents.
The UV–VIS absorption spectra of the ligand and the complex were
recorded on a Varian Cary 100 spectrophotometer with quartz cells
of 1 cm path length at room temperature. The analyses were per-
formed using acetonitrile as solvent. Elemental analysis (C, H) was
performed in a 240 Perkin-Elmer.
2.2.2. Theoretical calculations
Density Functional Theory (DFT) level using the B3LYP hybrid
functional obtained by the three parameter fit of the exchange-
correlation potential suggested by Becke [19] and the gradient
corrected correlation functional of Lee et al. [20]. The polarized
Dunning-Huzinaga DZ basis set [21,22] was used for the hydrogen,
carbon, chloride and oxygen atoms. For the titanium and zirconium
atoms the inner shell electrons were represented by the Los Alamos
effective core potential (LANL2) of Hay and Wadt [23,24] and the
valence electrons were explicitly included using the associated DZ
basis set. All calculations were performed with the Gaussian 03
program using standard procedures and parameters [25].
2. Experimental
2.1.1. Reagents and materials
All experiments were performed under argon atmosphere using
the Schlenk technique. The 3-hydroxyflavone ligand (Aldrich) and
ZrCl4 (Merck) were used without purification. All the other reagents
used in the present study were of analytical grade. All the solvents
were dried by usual methods existing in the literature. MAO (Witco,
10% (w/w) Al in toluene solution) was employed as received. For
the Zr complex synthesis it was prepared the ZrCl4·2THF adduct.
2.2.3. Cyclic voltammetry
The electrochemical measurements, cyclic voltammetry (CV),
differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and electrolysis were taken
with a potentiostat EG and G, 273A of Princenton Applied Research.
The electronic spectra were obtained with Hewlett-Packard 8453
Spectrometer. All experiments were carried out using a conven-
tional three electrodes cell: glassy carbon was used as working
electrode for CV and platinum gauze for electrolysis. An Ag/AgCl
electrode was used as the reference electrode and a platinum wire
as the auxiliary electrode. Ferrocene (+0.50 V versus Ag/AgCl), was
employed as internal standard in acetonitrile solution. A tetrabuty-
lammoniun tetrafluoroborate in acetonitrile solution was used as
supporting electrolyte. Successive spectra were recorded during
the redox process of the complexes. The supporting electrolyte does
not show redox process in the potential range evaluated.
2.1.2. Synthesis of ZrCl4·2THF adduct
The adduct of ZrCl4 and THF was prepared in a Schlenk under
inert atmosphere in the following way: 10 mL of THF was added
drop wise, at room temperature, to a stirred suspension of 8.8 g
(37.8 mmol) of ZrCl4 in 100 mL of dichloromethane. After 2 h, the
pink solution was transferred with a syringe to other Schlenk with
a fritted disk. 80 mL of hexane was added to the filtered solution
that was filtered again to obtain a white solid that was washed tree
times with 10 mL of hexane and dried under vacuum.
2.2. Synthesis of the complexes
100 mg of the ligand 3-hydroxyflavone (0.42 mmol) was dis-
solved in dichloromethane using a Schlenk. Another solution of
MCl4 (0.21 mmol, TiCl4 or ZrCl4·2THF) into dichloromethane was
drop wise into the solution containing the ligand. The mixture
was stirred at room temperature for 1.5 h. Then, the solid was
2.3. Polymerization reactions
Ethylene polymerizations were performed in a PARR 4843
reactor with 100 mL capacity. Into the reactor was added