ChemComm
Communication
(CASE) network is thanked for research exchange opportunities.
W.H.Z. is grateful for financial support from the Oriental
Scholarship, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central
Universities (WK1013002). T.D.J thanks ECUST for a guest
professorship. T.D.J. also thanks the Royal Society for support.
Notes and references
‡ When probe 1 is excited at the isosbestic point (446 nm, Fig. S7†) a
fluorescence increase at 581 nm is observed which is ascribed to release
of the DNBS quenching group. Conversely, when probe 1 is excited at
560 nm the large observed increase in fluorescence at 690 nm is due
to the fluorescence of the DCPOÀ produced upon cleavage of DNBS
from probe 1.
Fig. 3 Confocal fluorescence images in HeLa cells: (top) (A–C) cell
incubated without probe 1; (bottom) (D–F) cell incubated with probe 1
(20 mM) for 0.5 h. Emission was collected at 660–740 nm upon excitation
at 488 nm. Bright field (A and D), fluorescence (B and E) and overlap field (C
and F).
1 H. Refsum, A. D. Smith, P. M. Ueland, E. Nexo, R. Clarke,
J. McPartlin, C. Johnston, F. Engbaek, J. Schneede and
C. McPartlin, Clin. Chem., 2004, 50, 3–32.
¨
2 Z. A. Wood, E. Schroder, J. Robin Harris and L. B. Poole, Trends
Biochem. Sci., 2003, 28, 32–40.
3 A. Pastore, F. Piemonte, M. Locatelli, A. L. Russo, L. M. Gaeta,
G. Tozzi and G. Federici, Clin. Chem., 2001, 47, 1467–1469.
4 H. Tapiero, D. Townsend and K. Tew, Biomed. Pharmacother., 2003,
57, 134–144.
5 D. Zhai, S.-C. Lee, S.-W. Yun and Y.-T. Chang, Chem. Commun., 2013,
49, 7207–7209.
6 X. Chen, Y. Zhou, X. Peng and J. Yoon, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39,
2120–2135.
7 X. Li, S. Qian, Q. He, B. Yang, J. Li and Y. Hu, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2010, 8, 3627–3630.
8 L.-Y. Niu, Y.-S. Guan, Y.-Z. Chen, L.-Z. Wu, C.-H. Tung and Q.-Z. Yang,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 18928–18931.
9 G.-J. Kim, K. Lee, H. Kwon and H.-J. Kim, Org. Lett., 2011, 13,
2799–2801.
10 W. Lin, L. Yuan, Z. Cao, Y. Feng and L. Long, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15,
5096–5103.
11 W. Lin, L. Long and W. Tan, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 1503–1505.
12 B. Tang, Y. Xing, P. Li, N. Zhang, F. Yu and G. Yang, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 11666–11667.
cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and then
incubated with 10% fetal bovine serum followed by 20 mM of
probe 1 in PBS for 30 min. 2.5% DMSO was used in the cell
culture process. Bright-field measurements confirmed that the
cells after treatment with probe 1 were viable throughout the
imaging experiments, indicating the superior biocompatibility
of probe 1. After the co-culture with probe 1, remarkable
intracellular NIR fluorescence could be detected. The overlay
of fluorescence and bright-field images indicates that the
fluorescence localizes mainly in the cytosol, indicative of
the subcellular distribution of GSH and excellent membrane
permeability of probe 1. In contrast, cells that are not treated
with probe 1 display nearly no fluorescence, verifying the 13 S. Sreejith, K. P. Divya and A. Ajayaghosh, Angew. Chem., 2008, 120,
8001–8005.
fluorescence source of the 1-treated cells (Fig. 3B). Moreover,
the images also indicate that the probe has low toxicity since
14 H. Y. Shiu, H. C. Chong, Y. C. Leung, M. K. Wong and C. M. Che,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 3308–3313.
the cellular morphology is maintained. With this bioimaging 15 X. Chen, S.-K. Ko, M. J. Kim, I. Shin and J. Yoon, Chem. Commun.,
2010, 46, 2751–2753.
16 B. K. McMahon and T. Gunnlaugsson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134,
experiment we have demonstrated the potential of probe 1 for
the imaging of GSH in living cells.
10725–10728.
In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized a NIR 17 J. Cao, C. Zhao and W. Zhu, Tetrahedron Lett., 2012, 53, 2107–2110.
18 G. Kwak, H. Kim, I.-K. Kang and S.-H. Kim, Macromolecules, 2009,
fluorescent chemodosimeter for GSH based on a DCM frame-
work, showing a subcellular distribution of GSH and good cell
42, 1733–1738.
19 Z. Guo, W. Zhu and H. Tian, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 6073–6084.
membrane permeability. The fluorescence enhancement mecha- 20 W. Zhu, X. Huang, Z. Guo, X. Wu, H. Yu and H. Tian, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 1784–1786.
21 J. Shao, H. Sun, H. Guo, S. Ji, J. Zhao, W. Wu, X. Yuan, C. Zhang and
nism is based on the cleavage of DNBS from the fluorophore by
GSH, which switches the dark excited state to an emissive excited
T. D. James, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 1049–1061.
state. Probe 1 displays a colour change from yellow to pink upon 22 N. Zhao, Y.-H. Wu, L.-X. Shi, Q.-P. Lin and Z.-N. Chen, Dalton Trans.,
2010, 39, 8288–8295.
23 R. Zhang, X. Yu, Z. Ye, G. Wang, W. Zhang and J. Yuan, Inorg. Chem.,
addition of GSH, and thus can serve as a ‘‘naked-eye’’ probe for
GSH. Furthermore, we have also demonstrated that the probe can
2010, 49, 7898–7903.
be used for the fluorescent imaging of cellular thiols. Since our 24 S. Ji, H. Guo, X. Yuan, X. Li, H. Ding, P. Gao, C. Zhao, W. Wu, W. Wu
and J. Zhao, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 2876–2879.
25 J. Bouffard, Y. Kim, T. M. Swager, R. Weissleder and
DCM based system is very easy to prepare and has a long emission
wavelength and high photo-stability, we believe that it will become
S. A. Hilderbrand, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 37–40.
the probe of choice for biological applications.
T.D.J and M.L. are grateful for financial support from China
Scholarship Council (CSC) and University of Bath Full Fees
26 S.-P. Wang, W.-J. Deng, D. Sun, M. Yan, H. Zheng and J.-G. Xu, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 4017–4020.
27 X. Huang, Z. Guo, W. Zhu, Y. Xie and H. Tian, Chem. Commun., 2008,
5143–5145.
Scholarship. The Catalysis And Sensing for our Environment 28 L. Ducry and B. Stump, Bioconjugate Chem., 2009, 21, 5–13.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 1751--1753 | 1753