N. Raman, N. Pravin / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 80 (2014) 57e70
67
(KBr pellet, cmꢀ1): 1612
n
(eC]N); 1503
n
(eHC]C); 1467,1307, 835
.ꢀ
ꢁ
.ꢀ
ꢁ
h
ꢀ
ꢁiꢀ1
½DNAꢄ εa ꢀ εf ¼ ½DNAꢄ εb ꢀ εf þ Kb εb ꢀ εf
(1)
n
(eCeN str; eNO2); 1323 n(eCeO); 1681 n(non-coordinated C]O
in ox). 448
n
(MꢀN), 509
n
(MꢀO). 1H NMR (
d): (aromatic) 6.9e7.4
(m); (eCH3, 6H), 2.1 (s). 13C NMR (
d): 124.6e126.4 (C1 to C3), 134.3
where [DNA] is the concentration of CT DNA in base pairs. The
apparent absorption coefficients εa, εf and εb correspond to Aobs./
[M], the extinction coefficient for the free metal(II) complex and
extinction coefficient for the metal(II) complex in the fully bound
form, respectively [56]. Kb is given by the ratio of slope to the
intercept.
Cyclic voltammetry studies were performed on a CHI 620C
electrochemical analyzer with three electrode system of glassy
carbon as the working electrode, a platinum wire as auxiliary
electrode and Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode. Solutions were
deoxygenated by purging with N2 prior to measurements. Viscosity
experiments were carried on an Ostwald viscometer, immersed in a
thermostated water-bath maintained at a constant temperature at
30.0 ꢃ 0.1 ꢂC. CT DNA samples of approximately 0.5 mM were
prepared by sonicating in order to minimize complexities arising
from CT DNA flexibility [57]. Flow time was measured with a digital
stopwatch three times for each sample and an average flow time
was calculated. Data were presented as (
centration of the metal(II) complexes, where
DNA solution in the presence of complex, and h0 is the viscosity of
CT DNA solution in the absence of complex. Viscosity values were
calculated after correcting the flow time of buffer alone (t0),
t0)/t0 [58].
(C4),136.1 (C5),114.3 (C6),170.4 (C7), 20.4 (C8),153.1 (C9),123.3 (C10),
124.6 (C11) 146.6 (C12), 164.5 (C13). MS m/z (%): 582 [M þ 1]þ. LM
10ꢀ3 (ohmꢀ1 cm2 molꢀ1) ¼ 13.6. lmax (cmꢀ1) in DMF, 42,359, 32,161.
meff (BM): diamagnetic.
[ZnL2(ox)] (6) Yield: 59%. Anal. Calc. for C26H22N2O4Zn: Zn, 13.3;
C, 63.5; H, 4.5; N, 5.7; Found: Zn, 13.1; C, 63.3; H, 4.4; N, 5.4 (%). IR
(KBr pellet, cmꢀ1): 1606
1685
NMR (
n
(eC]N); 1526
n(eHC]C); 1320 n(eCeO);
n
(non-coordinated C]O in ox). 441
n
(MꢀN), 517
n
(MꢀO). 1H
d
, ppm): (aromatic) 6.9e7.3 (m); (eCH3, 6H), 2.2 (s). 13C NMR
(d
, ppm):125.3e128.6 (C1 to C3), 133.1 (C4), 136.4 (C5), 112.3 (C6),
166.5 (C7), 20.4 (C8), 136.9 (C9), 119.4 (C10), 131.6 (C11), 128.3 (C12),
168.7 (C13), MS m/z (%): 492 [M
þ
1]þ. LM 10ꢀ3
(ohmꢀ1 cm2 molꢀ1) ¼ 12.1. lmax (cmꢀ1) in DMF, 40,561, 29,198. meff
(BM): diamagnetic.
[ZnL3(ox)] (7). Yield: 53%. Anal. Calc. for C26H22N2O6Zn: Zn, 12.5;
C, 59.6; H, 4.2; N, 5.4; Found: Zn, 12.2; C, 59.4; H, 4.2; N, 5.3 (%). IR
1/3
(KBr pellet, cmꢀ1): 1615
n
(eC]N); 1524
n
(eHC]C); 3428
n
(eOH);
(MꢀN),
, ppm): (aromatic) 6.8e7.2 (m); (eOH, 1H)
, ppm): 125.0e127.9 (C1 to
h
/
h0)
versus the con-
h
is the viscosity of CT
1322
513
n
(eCeO); 1684
n
(non-coordinated C]O in ox). 430 n
d
n
(MꢀO). 1H NMR (
10.3 (s); (eCH3, 6H), 2.4 (s). 13C NMR (
d
h
¼ (te
C3), 134.4 (C4), 136.3 (C5), 114.5 (C6), 169.3 (C7), 20.3 (C8), 147.2 (C9),
122.9 (C10), 118.4 (C11), 154.6 (C12), 164.7 (C13), MS m/z (%): 524
[M þ 1]þ. LM 10ꢀ3 (ohmꢀ1 cm2 molꢀ1) ¼ 15.2. lmax (cmꢀ1) in DMF,
41,741, 33,853. meff (BM): diamagnetic.
6.4. Interaction with pBR322 plasmid DNA
[ZnL4(ox)] (8) Yield: 51%. Anal. Calc. for C28H26N2O6Zn: Zn, 12.0;
C, 61.0; H, 5.0; N, 5.1; Found: Zn, 11.8; C, 60.8; H, 5.0; N, 4.9 (%). IR
The extent of pBR322 DNA cleavage in the absence and presence
of an activating agents H2O2 and various radical scavengers like
sodium azide (singlet oxygen), SOD (superoxide) DMSO (Hydroxyl
radical scavenger) was monitored using agarose gel electropho-
resis. In reactions using supercoiled pBR322 plasmid DNA form I
(KBr pellet, cmꢀ1): 1611
n(eC]N); 1543
n
(eHC]C); 1264, 1081,
(non-coordinated C]O in ox). 436
): (aromatic) 6.8e7.3 (m); (eCH3,
):124.9e128.6 (C1 to C3),
n(e
CeOeCe); 1326
(MꢀN), 533
n(eCeO); 1683 n
n
n
(MꢀO). 1H NMR (
d
6H), 2.2 (s); 3.7 (eOCH3, 6H). 13C NMR (
d
(2
which was treated with the metal complex (5e50
vating agents (100 M) followed by dilution with the TriseHCl
buffer to a total volume of 20 L. The samples were incubated for
1 h at 37 ꢂC. A loading buffer containing 25% bromophenol blue,
0.35% xylene cyanol, 30% glycerol (3 M) was added and electro-
phoresis was performed at 40 V for each hour in TriseAcetatee
EDTA (TAE) buffer using 1% agarose gel containing 1 M ethidium
m
M,10
m
M) in TriseHCl buffer (50 mM) with 50 mM NaCl (pH 7.2)
132.5 (C4), 137.5 (C5), 112.8 (C6), 168.2 (C7), 20.3 (C8), 142.1 (C9),
mM) and acti-
122.2 (C10), 116.1 (C11), 158.4 (C12), 58.3 (C13), 164.3 (C14), MS m/z
(%): 552 [M þ 1]þ. LM 10ꢀ3 (ohmꢀ1 cm2 molꢀ1) ¼ 12.8 lmax (cmꢀ1
in DMF, 42,359, 31,833. meff (BM): diamagnetic.
)
m
m
m
6.3. DNA binding experiments
m
The interaction between metal complexes and DNA was studied
using electronic absorption, viscosity and electrochemical methods.
Disodium salt of calf thymus DNA was stored at 4 ꢂC. All the ex-
periments involving the interaction of the complexes with calf
thymus (CT) DNA were carried out in TriseHCl buffer (50 mM Trise
HCl, pH 7.2) containing 5% DMF at room temperature. A solution of
CT DNA in the buffer gave a ratio of UV absorbance at 260 and
280 nm of about 1.8e1.9, indicating that the CT DNA was suffi-
ciently free from protein [55]. The concentration of DNA was
measured by using its extinction coefficient at 260 nm
(6600 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1) after 1: 100 dilution. Stock solutions were stored
at 4 ꢂC and used not more than 4 days. Doubly distilled water was
used to prepare solutions. Concentrated stock solutions of the
complexes were prepared by dissolving the complexes in DMF and
diluting properly with the corresponding buffer to the required
concentration for all the experiments.
Absorption titration experiment was performed by keeping the
concentration of the metal complex as constant at 50
varying the concentration of the CT DNA within 40e400
measuring the absorption spectrum, equal quantity of CT DNA was
added to both the complex solution and the reference solution to
eliminate the absorbance of CT DNA itself. From the absorption
data, the intrinsic binding constant (Kb) was determined from the
plot of [DNA]/(εaeεf) versus [DNA] using the following equation (1):
bromide. The cleavage efficiency was measured by determining the
ability of the complex to convert the supercoiled form I DNA to
nicked circular form II and linear form III. After staining with an EB
solution (1 mM), the bands visualized and photographed. The extent
of DNA form I cleavage was measured from the intensities of the
bands using UVITEC Gel Documentation System. The observed er-
ror in measuring the band intensities was w4%. Inhibition reactions
were carried out by prior incubation of the SC pBR322 DNA (10
with DMSO (2 M).
mM)
m
6.5. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity
Qualitative determination of antimicrobial activity was done
using the disc diffusion method. The biological activities of syn-
thesized Schiff bases and their metal complexes were studied for
their antibacterial and antifungal activities in DMF solvent against
bacterial and fungal species. Suspensions in sterile peptone water
from 24 h cultures of microorganisms were adjusted to 0.5
McFarland. MullereHinton petri discs of 90 mm were inoculated
using these suspensions. Paper discs (6 mm in diameter) containing
m
M while
mM. While
10 mL of the substance to be tested were placed in a circular pattern
in each inoculated plate. DMF impregnated discs were used as
negative controls. Toxicity tests of the solvent, DMF, showed that