18
F. Cardona et al. / Dyes and Pigments 111 (2014) 16e20
2.3.3. 5,5-difluoro-2-phenyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydrobenzo[e]pyrrolo[1,2-
c][1,3,2]oxazaborinin-4-ium-5-uide 1
Employing the general procedure and using 2-(2-
hydroxyphenyl)-4-phenyl-D
1-pyrroline 10 (70 mg, 0.295 mmol),
triethylamine (299 mg, 0.41 mL, 2.95 mmol), and boron trifluoride-
diethyl etherate (754 mg, 0.65 mL, 5.31 mmol) in dry 1,2-
dichloroethane (1.5 mL) gave pure 5,5-difluoro-2-phenyl-1,2,3,5-
tetrahydrobenzo[e]pyrrolo[1,2-c][1,3,2]oxazaborinin-4-ium-5-uide
1 (79 mg, 0.277 mmol). Yield: 94%; white solid; mp 123e125 ꢀC; 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d
7.57 (ddd, 1H, J ¼ J ¼ 8.5, 7.5, 1.2 Hz, H-40),
Fig. 3. Molecular structure of compound 4 (only one enantiomer is shown for clarity)
(a) and unit cell content (b). Thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level,
hydrogen atoms are shown with an arbitrary radius (0.30Å). C, grey; O, red; N, blue; H,
white. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is
referred to the web version of this article.)
7.50-7.19 (m, 6H, H-60, H-200, H-600, H-300, H-500, H-400), 7.12 (d,
J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-30), 6.95 (dd, J ¼ 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H, H-50), 4.58 (dd,
J ¼ 15.0, 8.2 Hz, 1H, H-5), 4.27 (dd, J ¼ 15.0, 5.7 Hz, 1H, H-5),
3.96e3.78 (m, 2H, H-4, H-3), 3.41 (dd, J ¼ 18.1, 5.7 Hz, 1H, H-3). 13
C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3)
d
175.8, 159.3, 140.8, 137.9, 129.2 (2 ꢂ C),
128.9, 127.7, 126.7 (2 ꢂ C), 119.8, 119.7, 112.9, 60.3, 42.0, 39.9. 19F
Michael addition of nitromethane to chalcone 3 was attempted
using two different kinds of base sources, a secondary amine
(Et2NH) and an amidine (diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene). This
second one gave the better yields. The structure of the racemic
product 4 was confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction (Fig. 3).
The reduction of the nitro group could lead to side reactions, due
to the presence of a ketone and to the in situ formation of an imine.
To accomplish this reduction two experimental conditions already
presented in the literature were tested [31,32]: i) zinc, ammonium
acetate, palladium on carbon (10%w/w), MeOH, 12 h, rt; and ii) iron,
acetic acid, THF:MeOH/(2:1), 12 h, 65 ꢀC. The best results were
obtained using iron as the reducing agent and acetic acid as the
NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3)
d
ꢁ138.03 (dq, J ¼ 29.5, 14.4 Hz, 1F), -138.68
(dq, J ¼ 29.5,14.4 Hz,1F). ESI(þ)-MS: m/z: 266.1 [MꢁF]þ. Anal. Calcd
for C18H17NO: C 67.41, H 4.95, N 4.91; found: C 67.26, H 5.03, N
5.02%.
2.3.4. (E)-5,5-difluoro-2-styryl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydrobenzo[e]pyrrolo
[1,2-c][1,3,2]oxazaborinin -4-ium-5-uide 2
Employing the general procedure and using (E)-2-(2-
hydroxyphenyl)-4-styryl-D
1-pyrroline 11 (42 mg, 0.159 mmol),
triethylamine (161 mg, 0.22 mL, 1.595 mmol), and boron
trifluoride-diethyl etherate (408 mg, 0.35 mL, 2.87 mmol) in dry
1,2-dichloroethane (1.0 mL) gave pure (E)-5,5-difluoro-2-styryl-
1,2,3,5-tetrahydrobenzo[e]pyrrolo[1,2-c][1,3,2]oxazaborinin-4-
ium-5-uide 2 (45 mg, 0.143 mmol). Yield: 90%; pale brown solid;
proton source. D
1-Pyrroline derivative 5 was obtained as a racemic
mixture in 77% yield.
The boron complexes 1 and 2 were obtained following this
optimized strategy (Scheme 2). Michael addition of nitromethane
to 20-hydroxychalcone 6 [30] or 20-hydroxycinamylideneaceto
phenone 7 [26] using DBU as base gave the corresponding Michael
adducts 8 and 9 in nearly quantitative yield [33].
mp 129e131 ꢀC; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d
7.59 (ddd, J ¼ 8.4, 7.4,
1.2 Hz, 1H, H-40), 7.43 (dd, J ¼ 7.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H, H-60), 7.42-7.22 (m, 5H,
H-200, H-600, H-300, H-500, H-400), 7.14 (d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz, 1H, H-30), 6.97 (dd,
J ¼ 7.4, 7.8 Hz, 1H, H-50), 6.58 (d, J ¼ 15.7 Hz, 1H, H-
b), 6.21 (dd,
For the synthesis of
D
1-pyrroline derivatives 10 and 11, the
J ¼ 15.7, 8.1 Hz,1H, H- ), 4.44 (dd, J ¼ 14.8, 8.2 Hz,1H, H-5), 4.08 (dd,
a
reduction of the nitro group followed by nucleophilic intra-
molecular ring cyclization/dehydration sequence was attempted
using the iron/acetic acid strategy. Unfortunately this strategy was
not the best for these derivatives. The reduction with zinc and
ammonium acetate in methanol gave better yields and an easier
purification. The use of palladium was avoided due to the potential
reduction of the double bond present in compound 11. The corre-
J ¼ 14.8, 6.5 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.77-3.46 (m, 2H, H-4, H-3), 3.24 (dd,
J ¼ 17.8, 6.0 Hz, 1H, H-3). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3)
d 176.0, 159.3,
137.9, 135.9, 132.8, 128.9, 128.7 (2 ꢂ C), 128.1, 127.7, 126.3 (2 ꢂ C),
119.9, 119.7, 113.0, 58.7, 40.3, 38.5. 19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3)
d
ꢁ161.25 (dq, J ¼ 29.3, 14.2 Hz), -161.82 (dq, J ¼ 28.3, 14.2 Hz).
ESI(þ)ꢁMS: m/z: 292.2 [MꢁF]þ. ESI(þ)ꢁHRMS calcd. for
C
18H16BFNO: 292.1307; found: 292.1303.
sponding
D
1-pyrrolines 10 and 11 were obtained in 60% and 68%
yields, respectively.
3. Results and discussion
Boron complexation was achieved using BF3eOEt2 and anhy-
drous triethylamine in 1,2-dichloroethane at 40 ꢀC, to give com-
plexes 1 and 2 in 94% and 90% yield, respectively. The structure of
the complexes was confirmed by NMR, MS, and elemental analysis.
3.1. Synthesis and characterization
The synthesis of boranils 1 and 2 involved the preparation of the
D
1-pyrroline core. As this synthesis proved to be temperamental it
was first optimized on a model compound (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Optimization of the conditions on a model compound.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the boranil derivatives 1 and 2.