CHEMCATCHEM
FULL PAPERS
action displays the following advantages: 1) sole chemoselec-
tivity—only Buchner reaction products are obtained; 2) only
a nonprecious metal catalyst Cu(acac)2 is used; 3) wide sub-
strate scope—various functional groups are tolerated on the
aromatic group in the substrates.
point, we decided to further optimize the reaction conditions
with this cheap catalyst.[18] If we increased the catalyst loading,
the yield reached 94%, but the reaction time did not decrease
(Table 1, entries 9–12). To perform the reaction more efficiently,
we changed to a solvent mixture of toluene and 1,2-dichloro-
ethane (DCE) with a higher boiling point, which resulted in the
successful reduction of the reaction time to only 0.5 h with
a good yield (Table 1, entries 13 and 14). Other cheap CuII cata-
lysts cupric acetate hydrate and cupric chloride dihydrate also
catalyzed the reaction very well (Table 1, entries 15 and 16). Fi-
nally, 5 mol% Cu(acac)2 and DCE were selected as the opti-
mized conditions and used in the following studies.
Results and Discussion
N,N-Dibenzyl-2-cyano-2-diazoacetamide (1a) was prepared
from N,N-dibenzyl-2-cyanoacetamide and triflic azide in the
presence of triethylamine[16] and selected as a model to opti-
mize the reaction conditions (Table 1). In all explored solvents,
only the desired Buchner reaction product, the 5,7-bicyclic
Various N-alkyl-N-benzyl-2-cyano-2-diazoacetamides 1 were
prepared from the corresponding secondary amines[19] and cy-
anoacetic acid and investigated under the optimized
product
9-aza-9-benzyl-1-cyanobicyclo[5.3.0]deca-2,4,6-trien-
reaction conditions. All reactions proceeded smoothly
Table 1. Optimization of catalysts and solvents.
under the optimized reaction conditions to afford the
Buchner reaction products
2
chemospecifically
except for 1r with an N-naphthalen-2-ylmethyl in-
stead of N-benzyl groups, which stopped at the first
stage of the Buchner reaction to give the cyclopropa-
nation product 3r (Table 2, entry 18). The results are
summarized in Table 2. The diazoamide 1a produced
the desired product 2a in the highest yield because
the same two benzyl groups were on the amide
(Table 2, entry 1). Even for N-benzyl-diazoamides 1a–f
with benzyl, primary, secondary, and tertiary alkyl
groups on the nitrogen atom of the amide (Table 2,
entries 1–6), only Buchner reaction products were ob-
tained in all cases. No carbene CÀH insertion product
on the benzylic, primary, secondary, or tertiary CÀH
bond was observed, regardless of if the N-alkyl group
is straight or branched, linear or cyclic, primary, sec-
ondary, tertiary, or the even more active benzylic
group. However, higher yields were achieved if the
N-alkyl groups were more sterically bulky. This can be
rationalized by the preferred stable conformation of
the metal carbene amide intermediates I (Figure 1).
In the Newman projection of the intermediates, if R1
is more bulky, conformation I is more favorable than
II, in which two bulky groups exist in the gauche po-
sition because of steric hindrance.[2a] Conformation I
is the reactive conformation that leads to the Buch-
Entry
Solvent
Catalyst
Catalyst loading [%]
t [h]
Yield [%][a]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
toluene
benzene
DCM
CHCl3
DCE
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
toluene
DCE
Rh2(OAc)4
Rh2(OAc)4
Rh2(OAc)4
Rh2(OAc)4
Rh2(OAc)4
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40
0.5
48
48
48
48
48
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
69
69
70
61
68
59
63
trace[d]
60
69
79
94
90
1
[b]
Rh2(cap)4
Rh2(oct)4
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
1
2
5
5
5
Co(TDMPP)[c]
Cu(acac)2
Cu(acac)2
Cu(acac)2
Cu(acac)2
Cu(acac)2
Cu(acac)2
Cu(OAc)2·H2O
CuCl2·2H2O
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
90
87
86
DCE
DCE
5
5
[a] Isolated yield after column chromatography on silica gel. All reactions were per-
formed on a 1 mmol scale in 10 mL of solvent. Diazo compound 1a was dissolved in
5 mL of solvent and added dropwise with a syringe over 40 min. [b] Dirhodium(II) cap-
rolactamate. [c] Cobalt(II) meso-tetrakis(4-methoxyphenyl)porphyrin. [d] Most of the
diazo compound 1a was recovered.
10-one (2a), was obtained with slightly different yields under
the catalysis of Rh2(OAc)4 (Table 1, entries 1–5). The catalyst dir-
hodium(II) caprolactamate [Rh2(cap)4] with an electron-donat-
ing ligand resulted in a decrease in the reaction rate, which re-
quired a longer reaction time (Table 1, entry 6). However, differ-
ent Rh catalysts did not show a clear difference in either che-
moselectivity or yield (Table 1, entries 6 and 7). This phenom-
enon is different from that reported,[2b,7] in which the
chemoselectivity depends clearly on the ligands coordinated
to Rh. The inexpensive catalyst Co(TDMPP) [TDMPP=tris(2,6-di-
methoxyphenly)phosphine] did a poor job in the reaction
(Table 1, entry 8). Cupric(II) acetoacetate [Cu(acac)2], a very
cheap and easy-to-prepare catalyst,[17] showed a good result
Figure 1. Explanation of the chemospecificity: a) Cyano group and carbenoid
are in-plane, carbonyl group and carbenoid are out-of-plane; b) p–p Stack-
ing stabilizes conformation I.
and gave rise to the desired product in 60% yield with only
0.5 mol% catalyst loading. Therefore, from an economic view-
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 1679 – 1683 1680