(Porphinato) iron-Catalyzed Isobutane Oxidation
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 15, 2000 3127
were performed by Robertson Microlit Laboratories, Inc. (Madison,
NJ). Mass spectra were performed at the Mass Spectrometry Center at
the University of Pennsylvania.
mechanism accounted for the observation that primary C-H
bonds were inert to functionalization under these reaction
conditions.
General Procedure for the Preparation of (Porphinato)iron(II)-
(3-Fluoropyridine)2 Derivatives. The appropriate PFe-(py)2 species
(∼0.1 mmol) was dissolved in 3-fluoropyridine (3-F-py) (3 mL, 35.0
mmol) and brought to reflux under a N2 atmosphere in a 50 mL Schlenk
flask equipped with a condenser for 3 h. The solvent was evaporated
in vacuo, and the crude PFe-(3-F-py)2 complex was purified by
recrystallization from hot hexanes.
[5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(heptafluoropropyl)porphinato]iron(II)-(3-
F-py)2. Isolated yield: 95 mg (95% based on 100 mg of (C3F7)4PFe-
(py)2). 19F NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 20 °C): δ -79.61 (s, 12F), -84.69
(br, 8F), -118.66 (br s, 8F), -125.28 (s, 2F). UV-vis (C6H6) [λmax
(nm) (ꢀ (M-1 cm-1))]: 340 (4.47), 418 (4.95), 542 (3.76), 575 (4.28).
[5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphinato]iron(II)-(3-
F-py)2. Isolated yield: 95 mg (95% based on 100 mg of (C6F5)4PFe-
(py)2). 19F NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 20 °C): δ -125.95 (s, 2F), -138.14
(s, 8F), -152.15 (t, 4F), -162.15 (d, 8F). UV-vis (C6H6) [λmax (nm)
(ꢀ (M-1 cm-1))]: 312 (4.39), 416 (5.26), 524 (4.07), 553 (3.75).
[2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-Octabromo[5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluo-
rophenyl)porphinato]]iron(II)-(3-F-py)2. Isolated yield: 95 mg (95%
based on 100 mg of Br8(C6F5)4PFe-(py)2). 19F NMR (400 MHz, C6D6,
25 °C): δ -123.97 (s, 2F), -138.77 (s, 8F), -151.27 (t, 8F), -162.78
(d, 2F). UV-vis (C6H6) [λmax (nm) (ꢀ (M-1 cm-1))]: 345 (4.40), 452
(5.12), 556 (3.70), 588 (3.74).
To provide new insight into this mechanistic controversy, we
brought to bear two types of in situ spectroscopy to probe the
kinetics of these reactions and to examine the nature of products,
reactants, and PFe species present throughout the oxidation
reaction. This work couples in situ NMR spectroscopic experi-
ments51 with electronic absorption spectroscopic analysis of
oxidation reactions carried out in autoclave reactors; such studies
provide information distinct from that obtained previously from
product analysis of the oxygenated hydrocarbons derived from
reactions of hydrocarbons with dioxygen in the presence of PFe
catalysts.
In this paper, we examine the extent to which catalyst
electronic structure impacts catalyst stability and reactivity, as
well as product distribution, in the catalytic oxygenation of
isobutane, probing three different electron-deficient porphyrin
ligand environments: 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)-
porphyrin [(C6F5)4PH2], 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octabromo-5,10,-
15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin [Br8(C6F5)4PH2], and
5,10,15,20-tetrakis(heptafluoropropyl)porphyrin [(C3F7)4PH2].
We present evidence for a radical chain autoxidation mechanism,
in which (porphinato)iron(III)-OH (PFe-OH) species not only
are responsible for the breakdown of the tert-butyl hydroper-
oxides generated in situ during the catalytic reaction, but also
play the role of radical chain initiator in the autoxidation process.
Synthesis of Four-Coordinate (C3F7)4PFe. ZnHg amalgam was
prepared using a procedure described previously by Scheidt.57 Activated
Zn turnings (600 mg, 9.23 mmol) were added to ∼ 2 mL of freshly
distilled Hg, and the mixture was stirred under a N2 atmosphere for 1
h. (C3F7)4PFe-Cl (15 mg, 0.014 mmol) was dissolved in 2.0 mL of
dry, degassed C6D6 and transferred to the ZnHg suspension. The mixture
was stirred for 30 min, at which time the color of the solution changed
from deep purple to dark green. The solution was filtered under N2
Experimental Section
Materials. Inert atmosphere manipulations and solvent purification
were carried out as described previously.52 Methods detailing the
preparation of 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octabromo-5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pen-
tafluorophenyl)porphyrin,27 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)por-
phyrin,53 and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(heptafluoropropyl)porphyrin54 have
been described previously. The syntheses of 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-
octabromo[5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphinato]iron(III)
chloride and [5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphinato]iron(III)
chloride followed those described in the literature.27,53,55 The syntheses
of [5,10,15,20-tetrakis(heptafluoropropyl)porphinato]iron(II)-(pyri-
dine)2, and {[5,10,15,20-tetrakis(heptafluoropropyl)porphinato]iron-
(III)}2O have been reported recently;56 [2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octabromo-
5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphinato]iron(II)-(pyridine)2
and [5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphinato]iron(II)-(pyri-
dine)2 were synthesized using an experimental procedure similar to that
described for [5,10,15,20-tetrakis(heptafluoropropyl)porphinato]iron-
(II)-(pyridine)2.56 Chemical shifts for 1H NMR spectra are relative to
residual protium in the deuterated solvents (C6D6, δ ) 7.15 ppm), while
19 F NMR chemical shifts are reported relative to fluorotrichloromethane
(CFCl3, δ ) 0.00 ppm). Chromatographic purification of these
compounds was accomplished on the benchtop using neutral alumina
(Fisher Scientific, Brockmann Activity I, 200 mesh). Elemental analyses
1
and transferred to an NMR tube fitted with a Teflon valve. H NMR
(200 MHz, C6D6, 23 °C): δ -2.80 (s, 8 H). 19F NMR (200 MHz, C6D6,
23 °C): δ -76.84 (s, 12 F); -87.57 (s, 8 F); -106.98 (br s, 8 F).
Instrumentation. Electronic spectra were recorded on an OLIS UV-
vis-near-IR spectrophotometry system that is based on the optics of a
Carey 14 spectrophotometer. Variable-temperature and in situ high-
pressure NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian 400 MHz spectro-
photometer. High-pressure NMR experiments were performed using
single-crystal sapphire NMR tubes; their design has been described
elsewhere.58 GC analyses of our catalytic oxidation reactions were
accomplished using a Perkin-Elmer gas chromatographic autosystem
equipped with a 30 mm × 0.53 mm × 2.65 µm thickness Hewlett-
Packard HP1 cross-linked methyl silicone column. A 125 mL Parr
reactor equipped with a magnetic stirrer was used for the autoclave
oxidations.
Autoclave Reactor Oxidation Studies. A 125 mL autoclave reaction
vessel, lined with a glass sleeve, was charged with 20 mL of a 0.25
mM solution of the PFe catalyst in the appropriate solvent and a known
amount of isobutane. The vessel was then heated to 80 °C, and once
the temperature had equilibrated, oxygen (120 psi) was introduced into
the system. An oxygen gas feed vessel was utilized to maintain constant
pressure in the reactor throughout the course of the catalytic oxidation.
Aliquots (2 mL) were removed periodically from the autoclave reactor
for analysis; electronic absorption spectroscopy (25 °C) determined the
nature of the PFe species present as a function of time, while GC
experiments enabled identification and quantification of the organic
products generated in the reaction. The reaction was terminated when
dioxygen ceased to be consumed. After depressurization and thorough
cleaning of the autoclave, the vessel was charged with solvent,
isobutane, and oxygen and heated to 80 °C for 24 h to confirm that no
substrate oxidation took place in the absence of catalyst. If trace catalytic
activity due to reactor impurities was observed, the reactor was
repetitively recleaned and retested with the catalyst-free (blank) system
(48) Grinstaff, M. W.; Hill, M. G.; Labinger, J. A.; Gray, H. B. Science
1994, 264, 1311-1313.
(49) Labinger, J. A. Catal. Lett. 1994, 26, 95-99.
(50) Boettcher, A.; Birnbaum, E. R.; Day, M. W.; Gray, H. B.; Grinstaff,
M. W.; Labinger, J. A. J. Mol. Catal., A 1997, 117, 229-242.
(51) Moore, K. T.; Horva´th, I. T.; Therien, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 1791-1792.
(52) DiMagno, S. G.; Lin, V. S.-Y.; Therien, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1993,
58, 5983-5993.
(53) Adler, A. D.; Longo, F. R.; Finarelli, J. D.; Goldmacher, J.; Assour,
J.; Korsakoff, J. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 476.
(54) DiMagno, S. G.; Williams, R. A.; Therien, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 6943-6948.
(55) Birnbaum, E. R.; Hodge, J. A.; Grinstaff, M. W.; Schaefer, W. P.;
Henling, L.; Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J. E.; Gray, H. B. Inorg. Chem.
1995, 34, 3625-3632.
(57) Safo, M. K.; Nesset, M. J. M.; Walker, F. A.; Debrunner, P. G.;
Scheidt, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9438-9448.
(58) Horva´th, I. T.; Ponce, E. C. ReV. Sci. Instrum. 1991, 62, 1104-1105.
(56) Moore, K. T.; Fletcher, J. T.; Therien, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 5196-5209.