HAN et Al.
3 of 4
|
being 164.4(1) and 172.2(3), respectively. The bond distances
of Pt—P(1) and Pt—P(2) are 2.278(3) and 2.351(3) Å, re-
spectively, reflecting the stronger trans influence of the alke-
nyl group as compared to TePh.[6]
the reaction was run in the presence of an additional PEt3 (1.5
equiv relative to 3b) under otherwise identical conditions, ca.
20% of 3b remained unreacted and 4c was formed in only 58%
NMR yield. This result resembles the behavior of bissilylplati-
num complexes[4] and may suggest that the alkyne insertion to
the Si—Pt bond of 3 proceeds via a three-coordinate platinum
species generated by the dissociation of a PEt3 ligand. In agree-
ment with this assumption, Pt(TePh)(SiMe3)(dmpe) [6, dmpe
= 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane] bearing a tightly chelat-
ing phosphine ligand did not undergo such an insertion reaction
with 1-octyne at 50°C.b
Finally, it is noted that when the reaction shown in
Equation 1 was further continued at an elevated temperature
(110°C, 6 hours), 4a completely disappeared to reductively
eliminate vinyl telluride 7b in 67% yield based on 3a used.
This result together with the others herein described inti-
mates the possibility of a catalytic addition of silyl tellurides
to alkynes, which has never been realized so far. Studies
along this line are in progress.c
The stable cis geometry of organotelluroplatinum species
such as 4 is unusual since all other PtR(TeR’)(PEt3)2-type
complexes so far obtained adopt trans geometry.[3,6] Although
cis-PtPh(Tei-Pr)(PEt3)2 could be observed at the beginning of
the reaction of i-PrTePh with Pt(PEt3)[3,6] this complex was
not stable and isomerized quickly to its trans isomer even at
room temperature. A possible driving force for this remark-
able feature of 4 preferring the cis geometry may come from
an interaction between tellurium and silicon.[7] Indeed, the
molecular structure of 4b has revealed the distance between
silicon and tellurium is 3.990(7) Å, which is shorter than the
sum of their van der Waals radii 4.16 Å,[8] indicating such an
interaction.
A careful analysis of the reaction between complex 3b[3]
and 1-octyne revealed a more detailed process of the alkyne
insertion. Thus, 3b (40 mg) was allowed to react with 1-octyne
3
CONCLUSION
(1.5 equiv.) in benzene-d6, at 25°C for 1 hour. NMR spectros-
copy showed no insertion took place at all. However, the for-
mation of ArTeSiMe3 (3b/ArTeSiMe3 = 70/30) and an
equivalent amount alkyne-platinum complex 5 were observed,
indicating an equilibrium as illustrated in Equation 2.b
|
A Pt(0) complex easily oxiditively inserts to the Te-Si bond
of ArTeSiMe3 compound to generate a complex bearing a
Subsequent heating of the solution at 50°C for 2.5 hours re-
sulted in a complete consumption of 3b, affording the Si-Pt addi-
tion product 4c in 87% NMR yield. This insertion was retarded,
though not completely, by the addition of free PEt3. Thus, when
backbone of Si-Pt-Te bond. This Si-Pt-Te complex adds to a
terminal alkyne by the selective cis-addition of the Si-Pt bond
(not the Te-Pt bond) to the triple bond to give a new complex
with the Si moiety bonding to the terminal carbon and the Pt
moiety bonding to the internal carbon. Upon heating the new
complex at an elevated temperature, the corresponding cis-
alkenylteruride is obtained.
bSelected NMR data for 5, 6 and 7. 5: 31P NMR (C6D6) δ 16.5 (JPP = 39.2,
JPPt = 3459 Hz), 13.1 (JPP 39.2, JPPt 3243 Hz). 6 (CDCl3): 1H NMR δ 7.89–
7.91 (m, 2 H), 7.12–7.14 (m, 1 H), 6.98–7.00 (m, 2 H), 1.68 (d, 6 H, JHP 9.7,
JHPt 38.2 Hz), 1.59–1.65 (m, 2 H), 1.40–1.45 (m, 2 H), 0.99 (d, 6 H, JHP 8.2,
JHPt 15.3 Hz), 0.33 (s, 9 H, JHPt 17.7 Hz); 31P NMR δ 34.6 (d, JPP 6.2 Hz, JPPt
1313.5 Hz), 24.7 (d, JPP 6.2 Hz, JPPt 2963.7 Hz). 7 (CDCl3): 1H NMR δ
7.74–7.76 (m, 2 H), 7.20–7.31 (m, 3 H), 6.55 (s, 1 H, JHTe 72.8 Hz), 2.29 (t,
cPartial of this work was first disclosed in the XIXth Internatinal Conferenve
on Organometallic Chemistry, Shanghai, July, 2000. A catalytic addition of
PhTeTMS to acetylenes has not been achieved yet, partly due to the decom-
position of the current Te-Pt complexes that leads to the deactivation of the
catalyst (ref 3). The reason for the regioselectivity of complex 3 with a ter-
minal alkyne generating complex 4 was not clear, though a steric repulsion
of the bulky TMS group may play a crucial role.
2 H, J 7.7 Hz), 1.17–1.48 (m, 8 H), 0.86 (t, 3 H, J 7.4 Hz), 0.22 (s, 9 H); 13
C
NMR δ 141.0, 140.9, 138.8, 129.2, 127.7, 114.0, 46.7, 31.7, 29.6, 28.3, 22.6,
14.1, −0.10; 29Si NMR δ −8.14; 125Te NMR δ −370.4.