J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8133-8134
Extremely Facile Oxidative Addition of Silyl,
8133
Germyl, and Stannyl Tellurides and Other
Chalcogenides to Platinum(0) Complexes. X-ray
Structure of trans-Pt(4-PhC6H4Te)(SiMe3)(PEt3)2
Li-Biao Han, Shigeru Shimada, and Masato Tanaka*
National Institute of Materials and Chemical Research
Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
ReceiVed April 30, 1997
Silyl chalcogenides and heavier congeners (RZ-MR′3, Z )
chalcogen element, M ) Si, Ge, Sn), having a large share in
organochalcogen chemistry, are of great synthetic utility1 and
provide important starting materials for transition metal-
chalcogen clusters and nanoparticles of intriguing optical and
electronic properties.2 However, the reactivity of these Z-M
bonds toward transition metal species remains totally unex-
plored. Herein we disclose extremely facile oxidative addition
of RZ-MMe3 to Pt(PEt3)n (n ) 3, 4) to afford trans-Pt(RZ)-
(MMe3)(PEt3)2.3
Figure 1. Molecular structure of trans-Pt(4-PhC6H4Te)(SiMe3)(PEt3)2
(1b). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): Si-Pt ) 2.351(6),
Te-Pt ) 2.764(2), P(1)-Pt ) 2.282(5); Si-Pt-Te ) 156.9(2), P(1)-
Pt-P(2) ) 156.4(2), P(1)-Pt-Si ) 92.7(2), P(2)-Pt-Si ) 95.0(2),
P(1)-Pt-Te ) 92.6(2), P(2)-Pt-Te ) 88.9(2).
When PhTeSiMe3 (0.247 mmol) was slowly added to Pt-
(PEt3)3 (0.183 mmol) in C6D6 (0.5 mL) at room temperature,
the color of the solution changed instantly from brown to red.
As confirmed by 31P NMR, starting Pt(PEt3)3 was completely
consumed within 5 min while two new singlets ascribable to
free PEt3 and trans-Pt(TePh)(SiMe3)(PEt3)2 (1a; δ 10.9 ppm,
JPPt ) 2837.2 Hz), formed Via selective oxidative addition of
the Si-Te bond to platinum, were emerging. No other product
was found by NMR.4,5 The structure of 1a was further
confirmed by NMR spectroscopy. Thus, a singlet of Me3Si
because of their instability,6 the detailed study on their
decomposition (Vide infra) allowed us to safely recrystallize 1b,
a biphenyl analogue of 1a, in the presence of PEt3 to isolate
crystals suitable for X-ray analysis.
Complex 1b has a distorted trans square-planar structure
(Figure 1). The Si-Pt-Te angle is 156.9°, which is much
smaller than 174.9° for C-Pt-Te in analogous trans-PtPh-
(TePh)(PEt3)2 (3a)5 and close to 157.4° for Si-Pt-Br in trans-
PtBr(SiMe3)(PEt3)2,3a indicating a serious steric repulsion
between the bulky Me3Si group and PEt3.
BuTeSiMe3 reacted with Pt(PEt3)3 as selectively, affording
1c quantitatively. Furthermore, the reactions with germyl and
stannyl tellurides also resulted in the selective cleavage of Ge-
Te and Sn-Te bonds.7 Thus, the procedure offers a general
and high yield access to a series of (silyl)-, (germyl)-, and
(stannyl)(telluro)platinum complexes (1a-g), which can be
readily isolated as red solids though they are extremely air- and
moisture-sensitive (eq 1).
In contrast to the tellurides, no reaction was observed between
PhSSiMe3 and Pt(PEt3)3 even when a mixture was heated at 50
°C over 5 h.8 However, PhSeSiMe3 did react, albeit more
slowly than PhTeSiMe3, with Pt(PEt3)3. The reaction was
reversible. For instance, the reaction of PhSeSiMe3 (0.140
mmol) with Pt(PEt3)3 (0.093 mmol) at room temperature gave
a 24% NMR yield of trans-Pt(SePh)(SiMe3)(PEt3)2 (2a) after
0.5 h, and the system gradually reached equilibrium over a day
to form 2a in 63% yield.9 The corresponding stannyl selenide
PhSeSnMe3 was more reactive; the reaction of PhSeSnMe3 with
bearing a satellite due to the coupling with platinum (3JHPt
)
20.1 Hz) was observed at δ 0.515 ppm in 1H NMR. 29Si NMR
was more informative; Me3Si displayed a triplet at δ -7.1 (2JPSi
) 8.5 Hz) due to the coupling with the two cis-PEt3 ligands,
and the signal was accompanied by a satellite arising from the
coupling with the directly bound platinum (1JSiPt ) 1081.7 Hz).
In a separate experiment run in hexane, analytically pure 1a
was readily isolated in 85% yield as a red solid by simply
cooling the reaction mixture to -80 °C (eq 1). Although further
purification of this and other similar complexes was not easy
(1) Reviews: (a) Armitage, D. A. In The Silicon-Heteroatom Bond; Patai,
S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 1991; pp 213-
243. (b) ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry II; Abel, E. W., Stone,
F. G. A., Wilkinson, G., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1995; Vol. 2, pp
34-37, 166-174, and 293-296. (c) ComprehensiVe Organometallic
Chemistry; Wilkinson, G., Stone, F. G. A., Abel, E. W., Eds.; Pergamon:
Oxford, U.K., 1982; Vol. 2, pp 167-177, 443-447, and 604-607.
(2) For example, see: (a) Weller, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993,
32, 41. (b) Weller, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1079. (c)
Behrens, S.; Bettenhausen, M.; Deveson, A. C.; Eichho¨fer, A.; Fenske, D.;
Lohde, A.; Woggon, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2215. (d)
Fischer, J. M.; Piers, W. E.; Batchilder, S. D. P.; Zaworotko, M. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 283 and references cited therein.
(3) Oxidative addition of Si-heteroatom bonds is a subject of current
intense study. See: (a) Yamashita, H.; Hayashi, T.; Kobayashi, T.-a.;
Tanaka, M.; Goto, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4417. For reviews on
Si-transition metal complexes, see: (b) Sharma, H. K.; Pannell, K. H.
Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 1351. (c) Horn, K. A. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 1317.
(d) Tilley, T. D. In The Silicon-Heteroatom Bond; Patai, S., Rappoport,
Z., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 1991; pp 245-364. (e)
ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry; Wilkinson, G., Stone, F. G. A.,
Abel, E. W., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1982; Vol. 6, pp 1043-1114.
See also: (f) Sasaki, S.; Ogawa, M.; Musashi, Y.; Arai, T. Inorg. Chem.
1994, 33, 1660. (g) Murakami, M.; Yoshida, T.; Kawanami, S.; Ito, Y. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6408. (h) Levy, C. J.; Vittal, J. J.; Puddephatt,
R. J. Organometallics 1996, 15, 2108.
(6) This was not only because of the extreme air and moisture sensitivities
of PhTeSiMe3, but also because of an unexpected observation that 1a formed
quantitatively in the solution was disappearing during the evaporation of
the volatiles in Vacuo.
(7) Both PhTeGeMe3 and PhTeSnMe3 are as reactive as PhTeSiMe3
toward Pt(PEt3)3. Though bond dissociation energies for Te-M (ETe-M, M
) Si, Ge, and Sn) do not appear available, they may be expected to follow
an order of Si < Sn as predicted from the facile exchange reaction of
PhTeSiMe3 with Me3SnCl (ECl-Sn ) 422 kJ mol-1; see ref 3c, p 523),
(4) Pt(PEt3)4 was as reactive as Pt(PEt3)3. Starting PhTeSiMe3 may be
occasionally contaminated by (PhTe)2, resulting in the formation of a trace
of Pt(PhTe)2(PEt3)2.
(5) Possible formation of Pt(Ph)(TeSiMe3)(PEt3)2 Via the C-Te bond
oxidative addition of PhTeSiMe3 was not found at all, indicative of the
highly preferential cleavage of the Si-Te bond. For the C-Te bond
oxidative addition, see: Han, L.-B.; Choi, N.; Tanaka, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 1795.
quantitatively forming PhTeSnMe3 and Me3SiCl (ECl-Si ) 380 kJ mol-1
;
see ref 3c, p 6). Drake, J. E.; Hemmings, R. T. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19,
1879.
(8) An interesting activation of [(R2SnS)3] by a dimethyl-Pt(II) complex
was communicated. Rendina, L. M.; Vittal, J. J.; Puddephatt, R. J.
Organometallics 1996, 15, 1749.
S0002-7863(97)01374-7 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society